Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RFU statement: TMO reaction to alleged foul play against Owen Farrell

Tempers flare during last Saturday's Saracens versus Harlequins match (Photo by Andrew Kearns/CameraSport via Getty Images)

The RFU have moved to end the debate over last Saturday’s decision in the Gallagher Premiership not to review alleged foul play by Harlequins’ Stephen Lewies against Saracens’ Owen Farrell.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ex-England scrum-half Austin Healey spotted a clear-out by Lewies while working as a co-commentator for TNT Sports at the top-flight match which was held at Tottenham.

The alleged clear-out saw Harlequins captain Lewies, who had earlier been given a first-half yellow card, slide on his knees into Saracens skipper Farrell.

Rather than review the incident after the play had stopped with Saracens scoring a try through Juan Martin Gonzalez, TMO Stuart Terheege was heard telling the referee Christophe Ridley he did not want to explore the matter because Healey had spotted it.

This audio ignited debate and an RFU statement investigating what happened read: “The professional game match officials team (PGMOT) regret that questions have been raised about player safety and decision-making. Match officials take player welfare incredibly seriously and it is their overriding priority.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Saracens
52 - 7
Full-time
Harlequins
All Stats and Data

“At the time of the Gonzalez try, the television match official (TMO) Stuart Terheege asked the TNT Sports director for clips around the incident to review in the background before deciding whether to call an official review into the foul play incident or not.

“This is a common request from TMO to director that occurs in rugby broadcasting to enable the TMO to decide whether an official review is required. Simultaneously, the TMO also checked the grounding on the Saracens try.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In relation to the act of foul play committed by Stephen Lewies against Owen Farrell, the TMO saw the initial contact off the ball. He decided on the evidence that it was no more than a penalty advantage. As Saracens went onto score, that advantage was deemed to have been taken, so no further action was required.

“In response to Stuart’s initial request for images the director asked the TMO if he wanted to look again at the incident. The TMO declined, as he was confident in his original decision. At the same time, the TNT Sports commentary team also saw the replays and posed the question whether Lewies’ actions warranted a review.

“TNT Sports’ audio directors can cut to the TMO if there is a moment when viewers would benefit from their insight in their decision-making. At this juncture, some of the conversation between the TMO and match director with regards to the replays requested and whether an official review was needed were broadcast ‘live’.

“The conversation between TMO and director that was broadcast ‘live’ was regrettable, they were not intended to be heard outside of the broadcast truck nor were they the reason for the foul play incident not being formally reviewed. Terheege is disappointed that he allowed himself to be distracted with interactions with the broadcast team and did not communicate his decision to the on-field match officials.

ADVERTISEMENT

“TMOs do not actively listen or react to the broadcast commentary team. TMOs make their decisions independently, based on their own judgement, experience, and in line with agreed World Rugby protocols. However, due to their location at the matches, they sometimes overhear commentary. The nature of the audio configuration in some broadcast trucks and in some stadiums means the working environment varies from match to match.

“The incident was an unusual and unfortunate occurrence. The PGMOT, Premiership Rugby and TNT Sports are working closely together to make sure this does not happen again. The three organisations enjoy a close and positive working relationship based on a mutually beneficial system that has worked for many years. All parties will continue to work hard to further refine and perfect systems to ensure player safety and high-quality rugby.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

E
Emily Svendsen 40 minutes ago
Waratahs snap losing streak against ill-disciplined Brumbies

I rely on trustworthy platforms like Tutor com and Chegg Tutors to connect with students and grow my tutoring business. One day, I received an email from a company claiming to be a new, exclusive tutoring platform called EduConnect Pro. They offered to list my services on their platform for a fee of $4,000. The offer seemed legitimate. They had a professional website, glowing testimonials, and even a detailed contract. Excited about the opportunity, I paid the fee, hoping it would help me reach more students. However, after a few days , I began to notice red flags. The platform they promised never materialized, and my emails to the company went unanswered. When I tried calling, the number was disconnected. Panic set in as I realized I had been scammed. The $4,000 I had paid was gone, and I had no way to recover it on my own. As a tutor, losing that amount of money was devastating. It was my income, my savings, and my livelihood.Desperate for help, I reached out to Lee Ultimate Hacker, a company I had heard about from a colleague. I provided them with all the details: the company’s information, transaction records, and emails from the scammer. Their team was incredibly supportive and assured me they would do everything possible to recover my funds. Leveraging their advanced skills in digital forensics, the team at Lee Ultimate Hacker meticulously tracked the scammer’s online activities and pinpointed the offshore account where my funds had been diverted. They collaborated closely with international law enforcement agencies to secure the account and retrieve the money. In just a matter of weeks, they managed to recover and return the full $4,000 to me. The relief was indescribable. Not only did I get my money back, but I also learned valuable lessons about verifying opportunities and protecting myself from scams. Thanks to Lee Ultimate Hacker, I was able to continue my tutoring business with renewed confidence. They didn’t just recover my funds. They restored my faith in justice and gave me the chance to keep doing what I love. I’ll always be grateful for their expertise and support. LEEULTIMATEHACKER @ AOL . COM

telegram: LEEULTIMATE

wh@tsapp +1 (715) 314 - 9248

0 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Famous club back in National Leagues after 5th promotion in 7 seasons Famous club back in National Leagues after winning promotion
Search