Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rhule and Fainga’a hear punishments for Super Rugby red cards

Raymond Rhule

Raymond Rhule has been hit with a three week ban after his red card in the Stormers’ 23-26 defeat to Lions at Newlands in Cape Town on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee accepted a guilty plea from Rhule for contravening Law 9.25: A player must not intentionally charge or obstruct an opponent who has just kicked the ball.

He is now suspended from all forms of the game for three weeks, up to and including 22 June 2018.

The incident occurred in the 50th minute of the match between the Stormers and Lions played at DHL Newlands in Cape Town on 26 May 2018.

Video Spacer

The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee of Nigel Hampton QC (Chairman), Stefan Terblanche and Stephen Hardy assessed the case.

In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC ruled the following: “Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including from the Player and submissions from his legal representative, Adrian Montzinger, the Foul Play Review Committee upheld the Red Card under Law 9.25”

“With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid-range entry point of 6 weeks, especially given that that act resulted in a blow to the opposing player’s head. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Player’s excellent Judicial record, his good character and his early guilty plea at the first available opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 3 weeks.”

“The player is therefore suspended for 3 weeks, up to and including 22 June 2018.”

His Stormers teammate JJ Englebrecht also was hit with a one-week ban. He was issued with a yellow card and a warning for separate incidents during the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

Englebrecht was shown a yellow card for a lifting tackle in the 37th minute, and was subsequently issued a warning by the Citing Commissioner for an incident involving a dangerous tackle during an attempted clean out, in the 52nd minute.

SANZAAR Disciplinary Rule 6.1 states: “6.1: If a Player has received two Warnings or a combination of a Warning and a Yellow Card during a match, he shall be treated for disciplinary purposes as if he has been sent off.”

Englebrecht has been suspended from all forms of the game for 1 week, up to and including 2 June 2018.

“With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the nature of the persistent offending, together with the closeness together of the 2 incidents, merited an entry point of 2 weeks suspension. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Players excellent Judicial record and his admission of responsibility at the first available opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 1 week.” Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC stated.

“The player is therefore suspended for 1 week, up to and including 2 June 2018.”

Hooker Folau Fainga’a also pleaded guilty to foul play for his red card during Brumbies’ 38-28 win over the Bulls at Loftus Versfeld in Pretoria on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee has accepted his guilty plea for contravening Law 9.12: Striking with head, after he was red carded following an incident which occured in the 62nd minute of the match with Bulls prop Mattys Basson.

Fainga’a has been suspended from all forms of the game for one week, up to and including 3 June 2018.

“Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including from the Player and submissions on his behalf, the Foul Play Review Committee upheld the Red Card under Law 9.12” Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Nigel Hampton QC said.

“With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a low end entry point of 4 weeks, given some degree of provocation before the incident and the relative lack of force in the contact between the 2 players.”

“Taking into account mitigating factors including the Player’s excellent Judicial record, his youth and inexperience and his pleading guilty at the first available opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 2 weeks. In addition, given the Player’s good character and the fact that, in the Committee’s view, 2 weeks was a wholly disproportionate sanction for an offence that only related to comparatively minor contact, the sanction was further reduced by an extra week.”

“The Player is therefore suspended for 1 week, up to and including 3 June 2018.”

ADVERTISEMENT

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 5 | Making Waves

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 12 minutes ago
How 'misunderstood' Rassie Erasmus is rolling back the clock

Owen Doyle was a referee until 1994. He was in charge of the IRFU referees through the last replacement change (from 7 to 8 re[placements in 2009). He was subsequently an elite referee coach before becoming a journalist in the last few years.

The changes were made in 2009 very much the professional era.

The proposal that the IRFU agreed with is below. It is disappointing that you attempt to distort facts that contardict your argument.

In any Law whether legislation for running a State or for World Rugby the intention of the law when drafted is what counts. Now you can put your hands over your ears and sing ‘La, La, La’ because this contradicts your article in some respects but you can’t make up facts you don’t like. You’re argument that 7-1 splits etc should be allowed is a different one. My argument is because the INTENTION of the law was 5-3 then new laws will need to be drafted for less than 3 backs on the bench. If World Rugby ignore the law to the tune of ridiculous PR nonsense like ‘Its discriminating against South Africa’ then the entire basis for faith in laws becomes eroded. Big Unions will interpret laws to suits themselves at odds with their intention knowing that World Rugby won’t defend their laws.


I was part of the law group that determined the IRFU’s position on how things work currently. In short, we agreed with what was being proposed. It was to ensure that there must be three specialist frontrow players on the bench, plus a secondrow, and a backrow player, hence five. The backs were allowed to cover the specialist positions of nine and ten. Finally, one utility back would be permitted, making up the three.

137 Go to comments
I
Indrani aushal 24 minutes ago
England's Megan Jones makes club switch ahead of 2025/26 season

The aftermath of falling victim to a cryptocurrency scam is often a whirlwind of anger, regret, and helplessness. After losing a significant portion of my savings to a cunning fraud scheme, I was consumed by the belief that my funds were irretrievable until I discovered TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY. This exceptional team didn’t just recover my assets; they reignited my hope in the face of digital deception. From the outset, TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY’s approach radiated competence and compassion. Their consultants listened intently to my story, validating the emotional weight of my situation while swiftly pivoting to actionable solutions. What struck me was their refusal to exploit my vulnerability, a stark contrast to other firms I had approached. They presented a transparent fee structure and realistic timelines, establishing credibility that immediately put me at ease. Their recovery strategy was a masterclass in precision. Utilizing cutting-edge blockchain analysis tools, the team dissected the scam’s infrastructure, uncovering hidden trails in the decentralized labyrinth. Rather than applying boilerplate methods, they engineered a bespoke plan tailored to the scam’s unique mechanics. Their communicators maintained a steady cadence of updates, translating technical jargon into digestible insights without ever leaving me in the dark.What truly amazed me was their adaptability. When initial attempts hit roadblocks, the team recalibrated their tactics, demonstrating both resilience and ingenuity. Their collaborative spirit shone through as they consulted external cybersecurity experts to fortify their approach, a testament to their commitment to leaving no stone unturned. The outcome exceeded my wildest expectations. TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY retrieved approximately 95% of my stolen cryptocurrency in under a month. The moment I saw the funds restored in my wallet was surreal, a victory I had dismissed as a fantasy weeks earlier. Beyond financial recovery, they equipped me with actionable advice to safeguard future transactions, transforming my traumatic experience into a learning opportunity.TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY’s integrity is its crown jewel. They never compromised ethics for expediency, even when confronting the scam’s orchestrators. Their adherence to legal frameworks and respect for privacy reinforced my trust in their operations. For those reeling from crypto scams, this team is essential. They illuminate paths to redemption with unwavering expertise. My journey with them was more than a service transaction; it was a partnership anchored in mutual respect. To anyone questioning whether recovery is possible, let my experience answer.  With TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY, it’s not just possible, it’s probable.CONTACT THEM FOR EXPERIENCE LIKE THIS  EMAIL Techcybersforcerecovery@cyberservices.com    TELEGRAM (@)TECHCYBERFORC

0 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Fur set to fly as Parisian duo dragged into Top 14 relegation dogfight Fur set to fly as Parisian duo dragged into Top 14 relegation dogfight
Search