Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Right now, I am the chump': SA journo swallows loss to Wallaby 'wimps'

(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

Confident South African rugby journalist Mark Keohane has praised and applauded the Wallabies for their win over the world champion Springboks following a week where he labelled them “wimps” that would be “walloped”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Keohane boldly predicted the Springboks would reverse their troubles in Australia, where they haven’t won since 2013 and have pulled just four wins from 27 outings against the Wallabies in their backyard.

However, the resilient Wallabies rallied to beat the world’s number one side 28-26 on the back of seven penalties goals to Quade Cooper and a try to Andrew Kellaway to continue the Springboks troubled record Down Under.


The recently reinstated Wallabies flyhalf Cooper completed his 10th win over the Springboks in his career, and he holds a 7-2 record when playing the South Africans at home.

Video Spacer

What progress looks like for the Women’s game | Healthspan Elite

Video Spacer

What progress looks like for the Women’s game | Healthspan Elite

Keohane had attributed the Springboks poor run of results in Australia down to former coach Allister Coetzee, despite the run of results stretching over Heyneke Meyer’s and Rassie Erasmus’ tenures as head coach.

“The Boks back then lacked an identity in they forgot their own DNA and wanted to be a combination of Australia and New Zealand in how they played,” he wrote before the match.

He explained that the Springboks had now re-found their identity, built on “rugby intelligence” among other factors, which would separate them from the teams of the past that had failed in Australia.

“Kolisi’s Boks have an identity, which is founded on strength, rugby intelligence, physicality and breathtaking counter-attack ability.”

ADVERTISEMENT

After the seventh-ranked Wallabies, who had just succumbed to a run of three defeats against the All Blacks, handed the Springboks their second loss of the year Keohane described himself as “the chump”.

“Right in this moment, I am the chump,” he wrote.

“But as Australia proved so heroically, it takes just 80 minutes to go from chump to champ. Next Saturday can’t come soon enough for me.”

The rugby writer could not fault the officials for the proceedings at Cbus Super Stadium on the Gold Coast, with the Springboks own kicking woes and set piece to blame for their defeat.

“There can be no complaints about the match officiating because it is not the reason the Boks lost.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Boks lost because they missed 10 points on offer and they couldn’t control their own set piece with the last action of the match.”

Writing for the Daily Maverick, rugby writer Craig Ray credited the recall of Cooper as a “masterstroke” by Dave Rennie, and wrote that the Australians showed “more street smarts” in their tactics to defuse the Springboks’ aerial game.

“South Africa were lacklustre, ill-disciplined and sloppy. Australia were the better team and showed more street smarts,” Ray wrote.

“They effectively blocked Bok kick-chasers, and although Wallaby players appeared to be “changing lanes” to impede the chasers, they got away with it and so they continued to do it.”

Under the spotlight by the South African press was Handre Pollard, who came under fire for three missed place kicks that left eight points begging.

Ray highlighted Pollard and Am as two players who let the side down and offered performances well below their usual standards.

For SuperSport, Gavin Rich wrote that it was a game of “narrow margins” and that the Springboks could have, and should have, won had a few more penalties fallen their way.

“It was a game of narrow margins – Wallaby captain Michael Hooper should probably have been penalised with just over a minute to go, those dominant Bok scrums should probably have netted penalties, and the Boks could have, and maybe even should have won,” he wrote.

“But that has often been the story when the South Africans are in Australia and they will go into the return game in Brisbane on Saturday facing a severe test of their mental strength as they go out to end what is becoming a bit of a hoodoo for them.”

The two sides will face off again in Brisbane at Suncorp Stadium, where the Wallabies hold a strong record, this week, and, for Quade Cooper, a return to the venue he spent most of his career playing on.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search