Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rob Penney wasn't given much without Whitelock and Mo'unga

Head Coach Rob Penney of the Crusaders looks on prior to the round four Super Rugby Pacific match between the Crusaders and Hurricanes at Apollo Projects Stadium, on March 15, 2024, in Christchurch, New Zealand. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Rob Penney didn’t appoint himself.

No coach does.

I had misgivings about the decision of the Crusaders board to install Penney as head coach of the franchise and expressed those at the time.

ADVERTISEMENT

I won’t go as far as saying the Crusaders set Penney up to fail in the short term, but I’m not sure he inherited the calibre of squad that predecessor Scott Robertson did.

The heart of Robertson’s Crusaders was Sam Whitelock. Richie Mo’unga the brains.

You take those two out and, frankly, you’re not left with much. At least not when it comes to having the clinical ability to win when it counts.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

I see a few fans piling on Penney now and pointing to disappointing outcomes in his previous coaching roles.

Look, folk need people to blame when they’re unhappy, but Penney shouldn’t be the target.

Let’s isolate Whitelock for a moment.

Head-to-Head

Last 5 Meetings

Wins
2
Draws
0
Wins
3
Average Points scored
25
29
First try wins
40%
Home team wins
60%

Talk can be cheap, but it appears he’s been sounded out about an early return from his club contract in France and an unexpected swansong with the All Blacks.

Some might wonder why Robertson – having assumed the All Blacks job – might seek the services of a guy who’ll turn 36 later this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Well, look at how the Crusaders are going right now and wonder no more.

If anyone knows Whitelock’s value, it’s Robertson. He’ll be acutely aware of the hole left in the Crusaders without him and conscious that the same can’t happen to the All Blacks.

It was Penney that gave Whitelock his start in professional rugby. Robertson too, in a coaching capacity.

That’s why I struggle to join the group of folk wanting to round on Penney and I assume his appointment is potentially more about development than immediate results.

The Penney-coached Canterbury teams I covered were humble, hardworking and unbeatable when it counted.

ADVERTISEMENT

The culture, to my eye, was outstanding and I’ll give a couple of examples.

Daniel Carter and Richie McCaw played a bit for Canterbury during Penney’s tenure.

As stars, they knew they would be doing media every time they turned up to training.

Neither gave you a lot, in terms of barn burning quotes, but I did once get a very good and informative one-on-one interview out of Carter.

The thing is, before the pair even laced a boot at training, they asked who’d requested them for media that day and then fulfilled every obligation.

Related

I moved onto Wellington and the Hurricanes after that where, if you were a player of note, you didn’t have to do media. No, you were too special for that.

I mention that, because Penney’s teams won. So did those he left to Tabai Matson and Robertson.

The Hurricanes eventually did too, but only after Mark Hammett had come in and put a bit of the Canterbury culture into the place.

That’s one of the reasons I can’t really endorse the criticism of Penney.

I’ve seen him take boys, such as Whitelock, and groom them for All Black careers.

I’ve seen him take punts on left-field thinkers like Matson and Robertson and set them on the path to successful coaching careers.

I’ve seen what red-and-black rugby means to him and the responsibility he felt to honour the great coaches and players who’d come before him, through the performances of his teams.

I’ve seen the work he put into creating a culture where everyone was valued and respected.

Maybe players such as Whitelock, Kieran Read, Owen Franks, Ryan Crotty and Matt Todd would’ve become All Blacks anyway. I prefer to think the values instilled by Penney played an important part.

Robertson’s departure was always going to mark the end of an incredible era.

I don’t know if we’ll see the like of it again. But I do know what’s Penney’s done before and the environment he created so that others could continue to succeed after he was gone.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
D
Dave 268 days ago

Definitely sound read everybodyexpects immediate results these days, I don't think any team would travel well at all having lost three of the most important game changers in the game,compiled with the massive injury list they are now carrying, good to see a different more in depth perspective of a coaches history.

F
Forward pass 268 days ago

Great read. I wish you had done this article on the ROAR.

M
MattJH 268 days ago

I had not considered this topic like this at all, brilliant read.
I had been looking at his record at the Waratahs and thought it odd the Crusaders appointed him, then couple that with all that experience and talent departing and boom.
They’ve got some great talent developing though, and in all honesty I don’t think anyone would be over confident taking them on in a playoff match, no matter how poor the first half of their season was.
I think they can pull a game out of their ass when it counts.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search