Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'He didn't have the class to apologise'

Ronan O'Gara, Head Coach of La Rochelle, looks on in the warm ups prior to the Heineken Champions Cup Final match between Leinster Rugby and Stade Rochelais at Aviva Stadium on May 20, 2023 in Dublin, Ireland. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

La Rochelle boss Ronan O’Gara has spoken out after an unsavoury incident in the Top 14 saw him shoved on the sideline by Clermont’s flyhalf.

ADVERTISEMENT

The game took a sour turn as Argentine fly-half Benjamin Urdapilleta clashed with  O’Gara on the sideline as he attempted to retrieve a ball that has been kicked into touch in the 57th minute.

With La Rochelle narrowly leading 10-8. Urdapilleta, eager to play quickly, attempted to retrieve the ball from out of bounds, leading to a confrontation with O’Gara. Urdapilleta accused O’Gara of obstructing a potential Clermont quick lineout, sparking a scuffle between the pair.

Referee Luc Ramos penalized Urdapilleta with a simple penalty, which proved decisive as Clermont secured a 11-1o victory.

“With adrenaline, I sometimes have some excesses,” said Urdapilleta after the game. “He [Ronan O’Gara] is clever, I think he did it on purpose. ‘to prevent us receiving the ball. At the time of the action, we were behind in the score so it was complicated. But that’s sport, it can happen. Once the match is over, we forget.

Related

O’Gara’s response came during a press conference, where he expressed his disappointment at the situation.

“A little shocked” said O’Gara of the incident. “He wanted to play quickly so it happens, but I was in my zone. He pushed me twice, right? It’s weird… I know I’m no angel, but there’s respect, and tonight I think we crossed the line.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“It has no place in our sport. But a card? It’s not possible either, because it’s for the players against the players, not between the players and the staff.”

“It’s a disappointment, he didn’t have the class to apologise. I understand, he’s frustrated because he won’t be playing in the World Cup. That’s how it is.”

 

England women’s forward Rocky Clark wrote on X: “I’ve never seen anything so bizarre, no idea how Ronan O’Gara kept his cool, I’m not so sure I’d be that calm.”

It’s the latest sideline incident involving O’Gara, who has found himself in hot water in France on a number of occasions.

ADVERTISEMENT

In November of last year he was was sanctioned with a ten-week suspension as well as a fine of €20,000, of which €5,000 was suspended, on the grounds of an ‘attack on the best interests of rugby’ following one such incident.

Two months before that incident O’Gara was banned from the matchday touchline for six weeks after facing the charge of disrespecting a match official following the September 10 La Rochelle win at Lyon.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
N
Nickers 474 days ago

This was an ugly incident. Yes ROG is a loathable character with his recent sideline conduct but players pushing coaching staff on the sideline is inexcusable. By condoning Sexton's conduct recently World Rugby sent a clear message that (certain) players conduct is not a priority. The slippery slope to this becoming football continues.

A
Ace 474 days ago

ROG... Not someone I would hold up as a role model to my children.

T
TCO 475 days ago

He moved away slowly on purpose. O Gara has a reputation and that background makes this more obvious. Anyway, Urdapilleta shouldn’t have pushed him afterwards, now he looks bad. Better if he had just jumped for the ball
With this aggressive statement post match O Gara shows what kind of person he is

R
Rob 475 days ago

A penalty against cleremont proved decisive as cleremont went on to win…. Who is proof reading this

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search