Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Roux won't resign but SA Rugby may take decision out of his hands

SA Rugby chief executive Jurie Roux

South African media sources are reporting that controversial figure Jurie Roux does not plan on resigning from his position following the loss of his appeal against having to pay back £1.7m (R37m) to his former employer Stellenbosch University, but his future as SA Rugby chief executive looks certain to be decided in January.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the Rapport newspaper, the board of SA Rugby will meet in the middle of January while the executive committee is scheduled to convene towards the end of January to rule on Roux’s future. While SA Rugby’s offices are shut for the Festive period, by then the organization would have received feedback from their legal advisors as to the way forward.

In total, Stellenbosch University claimed R37,116,402 in damages from Roux. Roux had used a financial computer programme and had without authorisation altered its unrestricted reserves – which are funds which can only be spent with the authority of the institution’s Council – to R35,312,004.

Video Spacer

We got to speak to the man behind the resurgence of France rugby | Le French Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

France assistant coach Shaun Edwards joins us to discuss where the recent win over the All Blacks ranks in the list of special days he’s had as a coach, what it’s like working with Fabien Galthie, the need to win something, overcoming the language barrier, Gael Fickou’s role as defensive captain, Antoine Dupont’s freakish ability, the recent law changes and eligibility ruling and much more. Plus, we look ahead to the start of the Champions Cup this weekend and we pick our MEATER Moment of the Week…
Use the code FRENCHPOD10 at checkout for 10% off any full price item at Meater.com

Video Spacer

We got to speak to the man behind the resurgence of France rugby | Le French Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

France assistant coach Shaun Edwards joins us to discuss where the recent win over the All Blacks ranks in the list of special days he’s had as a coach, what it’s like working with Fabien Galthie, the need to win something, overcoming the language barrier, Gael Fickou’s role as defensive captain, Antoine Dupont’s freakish ability, the recent law changes and eligibility ruling and much more. Plus, we look ahead to the start of the Champions Cup this weekend and we pick our MEATER Moment of the Week…
Use the code FRENCHPOD10 at checkout for 10% off any full price item at Meater.com

Roux on Thursday lost an appeal against an arbitrator who ruled that he misappropriated funds between 2002 and 2010 when he worked for Stellenbosch University’s finance department.

SA Rugby issued a statement last week after the verdict and do no intend to enter into speculation until Roux has sought legal advice. Their statement read:“The Executive Council [Exco] of SA Rugby has been advised of the outcome of the appeal of the arbitration process involving Jurie Roux and his former employer, Stellenbosch University. SA Rugby will make no further comment until such time as the Exco has had the opportunity to confer with its legal advisers.”

Professor Stan du Plessis, CEO of Stellenbosch University, said the institution was pleased with the outcome. “SU [Stellenbosch University] is delighted that this case has been completed successfully, with awards in its favour on all its claims,” he said.“This was due to SU’s commitment to good corporate governance.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 35 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 2024 in review: All Blacks break Irish hearts by triumphing in Dublin 2024 in review: All Blacks break Irish hearts by triumphing in Dublin
Search