Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RPA warns of a mass player revolt over Seven Nations plot

The RFU have agreed a new sponsorship deal with O2. (Getty)

Damian Hopley has warned rugby chiefs they could face another backlash if they ignore the views of the world’s leading players in any plans to expand the Six Nations by including South Africa.

Hopley, chief executive of the Rugby Players Association which looks after England’s leading players, believes the failure of World Rugby’s plan for a Nations Championship which was due to start in 2022 should act as warning to those bidding to create a new-look championship in Europe.

Ireland captain Jonny Sexton, in his role as president of the International Rugby Players’ Council, last year led the chorus of disapproval from the sport’s leading players for the Nations Championship and Hopley is confident the united front delivered in the face of that threat to player welfare would be triggered by any change to the Six Nations that increases the demands on those taking part.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1226900254278242306

A Seven Nations, shoe horned into an already packed Northern Hemisphere schedule, would put extreme pressure on players with an expanded championship giving the competing teams just one week off.

If a team had their bye on the opening weekend of fixtures it would leave them facing six successive test matches without a break.

Hopley said: “If you look at the failed attempt at launching the Nations Championship by World Rugby, that effectively died a death when seven of the sport’s leading captains came out and said it wouldn’t work based on player welfare.

“That sent a very clear message that we are all partners in this game and everyone should be afforded that importance when you are talking about how the game operates. Clearly, the players’ voices are the most important because you want to make sure you have a team to run out there for the matches.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1226895793640132608

“You would expect there would be a strong player consultation going forward as you don’t want to go down the same road again because it becomes self-defeating.

“When the Six Nations has discussed moving to a six week schedule for the tournament there were concerns about player welfare, and Scotland were concerned about not having the strength in depth to be able to get a team through the intensity of that kind of six week window.”

The successful campaign against the Nations Championship showed the impact a united approach by the top players could have, and with a seemingly constant search by administrators for investment through new television deals, a number of new tournament scenarios are reportedly being discussed.

https://twitter.com/RugbyPass/status/1226878137759342592

“The opposition to the Nations Championship was a massive step forward,” added Hopley.

“One thing that doesn’t happen enough around all of these ideas is player consultation, and we can get better at it.

“The 2019 Rugby World Cup was a massive success and the players had a huge role in that, and going forward on the back of what happened to the Nations Championship you would expect players to be consulted and I am sure they will have strong views.

“The players are pretty much aligned around tournament structure, player welfare and rest periods and trying to find a better formula.”

Watch: Eddie Jones warns against Six Nations expansion

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Five legends to be inducted into World Rugby Hall of Fame Five legends to be inducted into World Rugby Hall of Fame
Search