Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Sad Eddie situation' won't make Rugby Australia chairman quit

By PA
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Australian Rugby Union Hamish McLennan speaks during a press conference in Sydney on June 6, 2023, after former Australian player Phil Waugh was named as chief executive of the national governing body Rugby Australia. (Photo by SAEED KHAN / AFP) / -- IMAGE RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE - STRICTLY NO COMMERCIAL USE -- (Photo by SAEED KHAN/AFP via Getty Images)

The chairman of Rugby Australia has said he will not quit following the resignation of coach Eddie Jones.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby Australia has yet to officially announce Jones’ departure in the wake of the Wallabies’ failure to reach the knockout stages of the Rugby World Cup, but Hamish McLennan vowed to continue in his role as he described the “sad Eddie situation” as a “hurdle we’ll overcome”.

The former England coach’s departure just nine months into a five-year contract has been widely reported in Australia amid further speculation he is heading for a second spell in charge of Japan.

McLennan told the Sydney Morning Herald in a statement: “I came to rugby to find a way to fix it when it all fell over and despite the sad Eddie situation, this is another hurdle we’ll overcome.

“I want to stay to deliver the 2027 World Cup in Australia. That has always been the big prize for Australian rugby.

“More destabilisation will just make matters worse, just when we’re about to break through. Life is not a continuous line of perfect calls and success.”

Related

McLennan played a key role in bringing Jones back for a second stint in charge of Australia, the 63-year-old replacing Dave Rennie just a month after being sacked by England following five wins in 12 Tests in 2022.

ADVERTISEMENT

But his return turned sour with just two wins in nine Tests – against Georgia and Portugal in the World Cup where they suffered losses to Fiji and Wales.

The failure to get out of the group stages for the first time came against a background of Jones denying he took part in an interview with the Japanese Rugby Football Union, both during and after the World Cup.

Despite multiple news outlets reporting that he was poised to meet officials in Japan next month for a second interview, Jones has repeatedly told the media that he was committed to Australian rugby.

Jones told the Sydney Morning Herald on Sunday: “(I) gave it a run. Hopefully be the catalyst for change.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sometimes you have to eat s**t for others to eat caviar further down the track.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
P
Phillip 418 days ago

“I want to stay to deliver the 2027 World Cup in Australia. That has always been the big prize for Australian rugby.”

This statement speaks volumes.
He isn’t a leader.
He isn’t in the trenches week in, week out with us at the grassroots, promoting the game, trying to get young people to play the game. All for free as volunteers too, I might add.

Instead, he’s in his ivory tower, making sure that at the end of it all, he comes out clean and dry. Regardless of the outcome; good, bad or indifferent.

We need leaders who are willing to get in up to their knees in the filth and help lift the game out of the mud. Not some one at the top weighing it down.

W
Willie 418 days ago

Awaiting the response from the rest of the RA Board…..

C
Chesterfield 418 days ago

The engineer of the bridge collapse wants to now engineer the whole transport system.
Another reactive, snake oil salesman who couldn’t read the room where a dinosaur coach who got fired for his failures due to an alienating, work place bullying approach to management.
Governance fail at its most obvious.
The Chairman shouldn’t be appointing coaches.
Eddie was burnt out maintaining his nasty behaviours in the land of Eng, and got wiped like the proverbial dirty bum.

T
Turlough 418 days ago

McLennan laments Jones departure as ‘destabilizing’ even though it was McLennan’s own poor judgement which led to the disastrous Jones appointment in the first place.
When the Jones/Japan story broke it was chrystal clear Jones was lying. When asked Japan said they couldn’t comment on candidates for the job. What more confirmation do you need. That and Jones’ legal speak during his interviews: “I don’t know what you’re talking about mate”. Not technically denying it.

T
Timgrugpass 418 days ago

Hamish McLennan. The personification of what's always been wrong with ARU. 1 big self serving boys club.

He was designer & fully & only responsible for the Jones appointment & RWC. TOTALLY HIS captain’s call … that produced the worse ever Wallaby embarrassment. And then AFTER THAT DISASTER Quote McLennan “I came to rugby to find a way to fix… “I want to stay to deliver the 2027 World Cup’.

Is he in touch with reality?? ie the disaster creator thinks he's the answer to ARU success.

& so the embarrassment continues.

So much for ‘ultimate responsibility is the chief, it’s on the cheif ‘, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.

Me, me, me, I, I, I. Zero responsibility. ANOTHER example of a corporate scam artist.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search