Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby has to endure the cards if it wants to have a future

Caleb Clarke was shown a red card for a dangerous airborne tackle at the weekend (Photo by Fiona Goodall/Getty Images)

Rugby’s administrators can’t afford to lose their nerve here.

In any sense.

If they abandon the current crackdown on tacklers making contact with an opponent’s head, rugby will go bankrupt.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not only will it cease to be a viable participation sport, lessening the volume of those who might progress to the professional ranks, but there will be a class-action payout to former players who’ve suffered brain trauma.

We have an example to follow here.

Over in the National Rugby League (NRL) they love a good crackdown. Play-the-balls, wrestling, high shots, whatever.

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 10 | Sky Sport

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 10 | Sky Sport

That competition is a fiefdom, run by a bloke called Peter V’Landys, who seems to change or re-interpret laws at a whim.

And do you know what players and coaches do? They wait him out.

They continue to infringe, knowing all the penalties and stoppages will infuriate fans, V’Landys and sections of the media. To save the spectacle, V’Landys will deem that the torrent of penalties must cease and coaches and players will return to doing as they please.

I remember a time when office workers lit fags at their desks and we blew smoke all over barmen, waiting staff and restaurant diners. I remember not having to wear seatbelts and people routinely driving drunk.

Just as I remember how we used to ruck in rugby and ruck hard. I remember how certain schools or clubs were famed for it and that if you found yourself on the wrong side, you were going to wear it.

ADVERTISEMENT

One day, if we’re lucky, we’ll also remember that direct and forceful contact with the head was once part of rugby. That “tacklers” tucked their elbows into their sides and drove their shoulder into the face of a defenceless ball-carrier.

The commonplace can become the rare and then the rare a distant memory.

That’s what has to happen here.

A Super Rugby Pacific game doesn’t seem to go by without multiple yellow cards and even reds. Everyone knows that will be the consequence of contact to the head and yet no-one seems prepared to lower tackle heights.

Suspensions are almost a blessing, because players have to be rested anyway. As for playing a man down? Well, it’s safe to assume the opposition will be down to 14 any minute as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last weekend’s Super Round in Melbourne was meant to be a showcase for the game. A chance to sell a bit of razzle dazzle to a relatively ignorant rugby audience.

Well, even dyed-in-the-wool fans were tired of the cards and penalties by the end.

This is where administrators have to have the courage of their convictions. They have to keep penalising and sending players off until the participants understand that things have changed.

Do we fine offenders? Maybe. Although that doesn’t appear to deter players in the NRL. They’ll happily hand over $2,000 if it spares them a fortnight on the sidelines.

This isn’t about the game going soft and taking collisions out of rugby. It’s about recognising that, as was the case when rucking still existed, that the head is sacrosanct.

Even back then, if your boot made contact with a head, you were sent off. And not for an inconsequential 20 minutes either.

Rugby has to endure this cultural shift with tackle heights if it wants to have a future.

And it might actually improve the game too.

With more legs and waist tackles, rather than this emphasis on wrapping up the football, we might see more action. More ball movement, more tries, more entertainment at a time when you feel as if rugby’s audience is dwindling.

Honestly, though, the game will cease to exist if we don’t address this now.

I watch and enjoy rugby for a multitude of reasons, but hits to the head are not one of them and I defy anyone to prove the game will suffer without them.

If administrators truly have the game’s best interests at heart, then they have to see this cultural change through.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
R
Rob 968 days ago

How about showing some concern for the defenders, many of whom make 20-30 tackles in a game. Don't you think they are susceptible to head-knocks? Of course they are and realisation must set in that this is a very tough sport. Lowering tackle heights may assist attackers, it won't always assist defenders. Fact of life. This game is being ruined by cards.

S
Stephen11 969 days ago

Spot on!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search