Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby Pod verdict on rumoured hefty Maro Itoje pay cut at Saracens

(Photo by Peter Nicholls/Getty Images)

Former Scotland lock Jim Hamilton and England out-half Andy Goode have weighed in on the speculation surrounding the future of Maro Itoje at Saracens.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clubs in the Gallagher Premiership are now restricted to having just one marquee player wage outside the salary cap and with the current deals for Owen Farrell and Itoje set to expire at the end of the 2023/24 season, something has got to give at the London outfit.

It has been reported that England skipper Farrell will be offered a fresh marquee status deal, meaning Itoje would have to leave Saracens to keep earning a similar wage or else take a hefty pay cut.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Itoje has in the past been linked with a switch to the Top 14 but Hamilton, his ex-second row teammate at Saracens, believes he won’t cross the Channel at the end of this season and will instead agree to reduced terms to play on at the StoneX in order to remain eligible for England selection.

The topic came up for discussion on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod, the weekly show hosted by the World Rugby Content Studios presenter and Goode, his former Leicester Tigers colleague.

Related

Here is how their conversation about Itoje unfolded:

Hamilton: That is because of the marquee. So the marquee, they are still sticking with one marquee and Maro and Owen are the marquees, so Owen will stick as the marquee and I thought Maro Itoje would leave Saracens. That would be my thought process around that. Highly sought after, but hasn’t kind of been on the form that he was.

Goode: He has over the last few games.

Hamilton: Well, there you go, he is out of contract, he knows what he is doing. Does he have the gravitas of someone like Siya Kolisi? No. Was he on that kind of trajectory of having that? I felt he was and he has dropped off slightly, but would someone in France want him for a million pounds? Probably. Or Japan. But France probably more so. The Top 14 would look to bend over backwards to take Maro Itoje for their team, but everything is pointing towards him is now going to take a 50 per cent pay cut.

ADVERTISEMENT

Goode: Are you announcing that he has signed, Jim? He’s staying?

Hamilton: No. I have got no idea. This is what I am reading. The rumours, if we can talk about rumours.

Goode: I thought you mentored him?

Hamilton: I mentored him and then he didn’t like me after we started. I don’t know. He unfollowed me on social media and we will come onto people unfollowing and blocking; Joe Marler who looks like he has already retired at the weekend, but we will come onto that. Yeah, I don’t know. I respect Maro, I like him, I thought he would have left Saracens. It seemed to me like he needed a freshen-up but everything is pointing towards him staying at a 50 per cent pay cut, whatever that is.

  • Click here to listen to the latest Rugby Pod show   
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
B
BigMaul 396 days ago

Saracens benefitting from their cheating again. Pay Maro loads up front, beyond the means of the cap. Then he takes a massive pay cut when Sarries need to stay in the cap. Convenient.

C
Colin 396 days ago

Having watched OF play for club and captain country, I have no idea why he is rated so highly. So many better 10s in Premiership.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search