Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Nigel Owens on what he would do to improve football's controversial VAR use

Rugby referee Nigel Owens and Peter O'Mahony (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Nigel Owens was confined to bed this weekend, illness resulting in the popular referee from Wales missing out on the Clermont vs Ulster Heineken Champions Cup match he had been appointed to.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, that didn’t prevent him from having quite an extended opinion on how the rival sport of football has become mired in controversy following the English Premier League’s adoption this season of video technology. 

Video assistant referees were brought into the Premier League for the 2019/20 season with a clear objective: to help make difficult decisions easier and eradicate clear and obvious errors. 

However, halfway through the season, the technology continues to cause more and more controversy and it sparked further heated debate on Friday night when David Moyes’ West Ham United had an injury-time equaliser at Sheffield United ruled out by VAR. 

A Liverpool fan who admitted he tunes into the BBC’s Match of the Day programme whenever possible, Owens revealed in his weekly walesonline.com column that he is frequently asked about the introduction of VAR to football following rugby’s use of the TMO [television match official] for quite a few years. 

(Continue reading below…)

The Rugby Pod on Nigel Wray and the future of Saracens

Video Spacer

“My reply is always the same,” he wrote. “That the modern game – be it football or rugby – is so incredibly fast that if you want to get the big decisions correct, then you need technology to help ensure that.”

Tackling the ongoing controversies that are affecting football’s use of VAR, Owens proceeded to make a lengthy assessment under seven different headings.

ADVERTISEMENT

Offside controversy: “The officials, including VAR, cannot be blamed for this one. You are either offside or you are not. There is no grey area. In football, provided you directly influence the game, that is the rule. That is what VAR is judging on.

“Once you go to them [the VAR or TMO] to review something, it ties the referee’s hands in applying empathy and the decision has to be a technical one. Is he offside, yes or no, as the rule stands? So don’t blame the referee or the VAR officials, they have to go by the letter of the law.”

Is VAR being over-used?: “There is no doubt in my mind that VAR, and the TMO for that matter, is being over-used. Every goal is checked at the moment, for example, and that’s probably a little bit too much.

“That applies in rugby as well. We as match officials need to get the majority of our on-field decisions right and use the technology as back-up rather than to make decisions for us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The time it takes to make decisions: “This is one of the big issues in football at the moment, with claims it takes up to three minutes before a decision is made. A goal ruled out, or a penalty award. People get fed up with it, and understandably so.”

Refusal to look at pitchside monitors: “While the referees may be under a Premier League directive, this is one that I cannot fully understand if I’m honest. Look, if you are the referee, you are ultimately the one responsible for making key decisions. You are the one who will be receiving the flak.”

The lack of a big screen: “Rugby referees have the advantage of being able to look at any contentious incident up on the big screen. That doesn’t happen in football and I’m not sure that is fair on the fans who have paid good money to attend the game yet are left in the dark about VAR decision-making.”

The passion being taken out of the game: “This you could argue applies to rugby, as well as football, when a try is being checked and then potentially ruled out. But by showing the incident up on the big screen, the fans become part of that excitement and the passion isn’t lost.”

Don’t shoot the officials: “This is not a question of rugby getting it right and football needing to learn. Definitely not. As I say, I feel we still use the TMO a little too much in rugby and, of course, we had our own issues in the early days.”

WATCH: RugbyPass have made something truly special with the Barbarians rugby team – the release date is this Sunday, January 12

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 32 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

7 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Raffaele Storti: The Portuguese 'arrow' poised to carve up Murrayfield Raffaele Storti: The Portuguese 'arrow' poised to carve up Murrayfield
Search