Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby snubbed completely by ESPN in greatest athletes of the 21st century list

When discussing the greatest player of all-time, Dan Carter and Richie McCaw are usually in the conversation. (Photo David Rogers/Getty Images)

ESPN has snubbed rugby completely from it’s greatest 100 professional athletes of the 21st century list, without a single player named while Skiing, Cricket and Snowboarding all managed at least one selection.

ADVERTISEMENT

As expected, the list is dominated by Basketball (24 selections), Baseball (17 selections) and American Football (12), but it still comes as a surprise that rugby as one of the most physical demanding sports on the planet didn’t register a single player.

The list features incredible athletes of the modern age from all sports in the top 10; Michael Phelps (No 1 overall), Serena Williams (No 2), Lionel Messi (No 3), Lebron James (No 4), Tom Brady (No 5), Simone Biles (No 7), Tiger Woods (No 8) and Usain Bolt (No 9).

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Since the year 2000 rugby union has seen names like Jonah Lomu, Jonny Wilkinson, Brian O’Driscoll, Dan Carter, Bryan Habana, Richie McCaw star on the global stage in the international game.

Although the list was released in July before the Olympics, Portia Woodman-Wickliffe had a genuine case before the Paris games with one Olympic gold medal in sevens (now two), along with two Rugby World Cups in 15s.

But they were unable to crack the list over WNBA players Diana Taurasi, Tamika Catchings, Maya Moore, who are next to unrecognisable outside of the United States.

Controversially, NBA stars James Harden and Chris Paul made the list at 67th and 83rd solely from individual achievements in the NBA without winning a championship. Similarly, baseballer Bryce Harper was ranked at 79 based only on individual MLB achievements but without a World Series win.

ADVERTISEMENT

All Black Dan Carter’s decorated rugby career and merit in the international game arguably warrants inclusion on the list. One of the few to transcend the game to the global level with Adidas and other endorsements, Carter has rubbed shoulders with many of sport’s global superstars, an indication of his on-field feats.

Notable selections from other sports include Indian cricketer Virat Kohli, who became the sport’s sole inclusion over the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Brian Lara, Ricky Ponting, Shane Warne, and Shoaib Akhtar.

Japanese gymnast Kohei Uchimura, a seven-time Olympic medalist, ranked 82nd overall. Snowboarder Shaun White ranked 72 after three Olympic gold medals in the half-pipe.

Australian basketballer Lauren Jackson, a two-time WNBA champion and four-time Olympic medallist, came in at 84.

ADVERTISEMENT

By geography, 56 of the top 100 were American, 22 Europeans, five Asians, five South Americans, and one Australian.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search