Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby World Cup Depth Chart - England

Owen Farrell, Maro Itoje and Henry Slade have all been key for England so far, but will they still be there in 2023?

England named their World Cup training squad last week and attention now turns to their upcoming warm-up games, as they finalise their depth chart ahead of flying out to Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

Home and away matches against Wales loom, while they will also host Ireland and Italy in a four-match series that Eddie Jones will hope is enough to blow away the cobwebs and get his side firing ahead of their tournament opener against Tonga on September 22.

With established players such as Chris Robshaw, Nathan Hughes and Danny Care not included in the 38-man squad consisting of 35 fit players and three rehabilitating from injury, there are positions up for grabs even at this late in the cycle.

That said, a number of players have cemented themselves into their positions over the last few years and there is a fairly familiar look to the squad depth chart below.

Up front, Joe Marler’s return from international retirement changes the complexion among the looseheads where one of Ellis Genge and Ben Moon could now miss out, while Jack Singleton has seemingly catapulted himself ahead of Tom Dunn in Dylan Hartley’s absence.

England rugby depth chart
England’s depth chart heading into their World Cup warm-up games (Graphic by Sam Stevens)

Charlie Ewels will have his work cut out trying to break into the established locking quartet that England have leaned on under Jones, with George Kruis and Maro Itoje the starting pair and Courtney Lawes and Joe Launchbury offering enviable depth.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lack of Bristol No8 Hughes in the squad has raised eyebrows, although starting blindside Mark Wilson has shown he is more than capable of picking up the slack at the base of the scrum if required.

Both Sam Underhill and Brad Shields look entrenched as back-up options to Wilson and Tom Curry, with the onus on Lewis Ludlam to do something special over the next couple of weeks to earn his spot.

Ben Spencer pips Willi Heinz to the role of Ben Youngs’ deputy thanks to his previous inclusions and strong finish to the season with Saracens. Jones hasn’t been afraid to take just two scrum-halves to World Cups or on tours previously, so there is plenty of motivation for those two to put their best feet forward in the upcoming games.

To the chagrin of many, Danny Cipriani remains in third spot on the depth chart at fly-half, with Owen Farrell the proven starter and George Ford continuing to hold off the Gloucester man.

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s hard-hitting pair of Manu Tuilagi and Ben Te’o slot in ahead of Piers Francis at inside centre, while Henry Slade’s international form this past season is just enough to keep him in front of Jonathan Joseph at 13.

Chris Ashton’s withdrawal doesn’t help England, but they have strong depth across the back three, so much so that Mike Brown has been sacrificed. Anthony Watson is capable of playing at 15 should Elliot Daly suffer an injury.

Ruaridh McConnochie slips in behind his Bath team-mate on the wing, although there is potential for an all-Bath back three between the former sevens player, Watson and Joe Cokanasiga.

(Graphic Credit: Sam Stevens, Reddit. Depth chart republished with permission of the author)

WATCH: Part one of the two-part RugbyPass documentary on the many adventures that fans experience in Japan at this year’s World Cup

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search