Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rugby World Cup: Fiji player ratings vs Wallabies

Waisea Nayacalevu on the run for Fiji. (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

The Wallabies survived a massive scare in their opening Rugby World Cup match, overcoming a nine-point second half deficit to run out 39-21 victors over Fiji in Sapporo.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here are our player ratings for the valiant Flying Fijians:

1. Campese Ma’afu – 4

Not much to write about and didn’t offer much around the park before being substituted midway through the second half. Only missed one of his 12 tackle attempts, and held his weight in a poor Fijian scrum, but just never really got out of first gear.

2. Sam Matavesi – 6 

Was part of a crumbly tight five at scrum time, but snatched a vital turnover early in the second half to deny the Wallabies a try-scoring opportunity on the right edge. Threw well at lineout time.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

3. Peni Ravai – 5

Enthusiastic, but not overly efficient. Conceded a handling error deep in his own territory inside the first quarter of the match and played a key part in a collectively poor scrummaging effort by the Fijian tight five, all of which eventually led to Michael Hooper’s try.

4. Tevita Cavubati – 6

ADVERTISEMENT

Not the strongest display by any stretch of the imagination, but it was an honest effort. Won two lineout throws, managed to steal one from the Wallabies and shifted his lofty frame around the park to make 13 tackles, but provided little on attack, and was prone to giving away a couple of penalties.

5. Leone Nakarawa – 7

Put Nic White under pressure defensively early on to force the penalty, which led to Fiji’s opening three points. The offloading flair that helped make him an Olympic champion three years ago was also evident at times. 14 tackles illustrated his high work rate, but slipped off four tackles, which wouldn’t have helped Fiji’s cause.

6. Dominiko Waqaniburotu – 5

ADVERTISEMENT

A disappointing showing from the Fijian captain. Went missing throughout the contest, carrying for only two metres from two runs and completed the match with a tackle percentage of just 67 percent while giving away two penalties. Needs to show more leadership in Fiji’s next match against Uruguay.

7. Peceli Yato – 8

Sublime work at the breakdown and outstanding with ball in hand. Bagged himself a try, made a linebreak and stole a penalty at the breakdown all inside the first 15 minutes. A crying shame that an HIA ruled him out of action near the half hour mark.

8. Viliame Mata – 6 

A quiet performance before being substituted at half-time. Never really got into the match, but there is still plenty of time for Edinburgh’s Olympic champion to prove his worth on the world stage.

9. Frank Lomani – 6 

Worked hard all match long, and did better than his opposite Nic White, but the class of Australian sub Will Genia was evident upon his introduction in the second half. His box kicks will be a work-on for the new Melbourne Rebels signing.

10. Ben Volavola – 8

Fiji couldn’t have played so well in the first 50 minutes of this match without the exceptional composure of playmaker Ben Volavola. Has matured well since his World Cup debut against England at Twickenham four years ago. His time with the Crusaders, North Harbour and Racing 92 appears to have served him very well, as his tactical kicking and game management shone. Outplayed Christian Lealiifano, but the Australian’s departure near the 60th minute spelled the end of Volavola’s dominance.

11. Semi Radradra – 7

Not as barnstorming as his wing partner Tuisova, but still asked plenty of questions of the Australian defence. Latched onto the end of a Volavola cross kick to emphasise his aerial ability, and ran over a couple of players in green and gold for show his physical prowess. Ran for 45 metres and beat seven defenders, and will run riot against Uruguay in Fiji’s next match.

12. Levani Botia – 6

Blockbusting on defence, but a bit shaky on the other side of the ball. Provided plenty of impetus and turned the game on its head at times with his brutal rush defence, but over-eagerness on attack cost his side on occasion. Aggressiveness on defence eventually counted against him, as he was sent to the sin bin for a high tackle right in his own tryline.

13. Waisea Nayacalevu – 7

 Played the role of link man between Tuisova and Yato very well in the lead up to the latter’s try early in the first half. Backed that up with a shuddering shot on Kurtley Beale to win his side a penalty, which eventually led to his side’s second try. Was then rewarded with an opportunistic try from a Lealiifano error to cap off a good performance in the No. 13 jersey, although defence will be a work-on after missing a third of his tackles.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2qX2BOIXjW/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

14. Josua Tuisova – 8

Lived up to expectations with some strong, powerful carries down the right flank which put the Wallabies under pressure constantly. Effectively set-up his side’s first try inside the first 10 minutes. Sent Reece Hodge and James O’Connor flying with his powerful ball-running, and his effectiveness with ball in hand is reflected by his 53 running metres, four defenders beaten and one clean break. Could go on to be one of the stars of the tournament.

15. Kini Murimurivalu – 6

 A quiet night for the Fiji fullback. Didn’t get an opportunity to showcase his talents with ball in hand, ending the match with just two carries and five metres from them. Will want to get more involved in his side’s forthcoming matches.

Reserves:

16. Tuvere Vugakoto – 6

 Carried on from where Matavesi left off in terms of lineout throwing, but wasn’t that impressive elsewhere. One of many from the bench who were on the field when Fiji capitulated in the second half,

17. Eroni Mawi – 5

The Fijian scrum wasn’t any better or worse when Mawi was subbed onto the field alongside Saulo, but his work rate probably wasn’t high enough to yield the desired effect of his introduction into the match.

18. Manasa Saulo – 5

Similar effort to that of Mawi, but had a poorer showing on defence, missing two of his five tackle attempts.

19. Tevita Ratuva – 5

 Came on in place of Mata at half-time, but it was a lacklustre showing from the Harlequins second rower. Missed three of his seven tackle attempts and didn’t offer anything on attack. Perhaps playing in his natural position of lock may have suited him better.

20. Mosese Voka – 6

Was Yato’s replacement in the first half, and although he didn’t live up to the standard that his replacement set inside the first 25 minutes, Voka ploughed through his work tirelessly. Maintained a 100 percent tackle rate from 12 attempts.

21. Nikola Matawalu – N/A

Didn’t get enough of a chance to involve himself in the match. Needed more game time.

22. Alivereti Veitokani – N/A

 Little to no impact when introduced late in the piece.

23. Vereniki Goneva – N/A

Ditto Veitokani.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search