Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Refereeing blunder blights another World Cup game

David Halaifonua has his try disallowed as he is shoulder charged into touch by Tomas Lavanini. (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Heading into the 2019 Rugby World Cup, there was a concern that the stringent sanctions on high and reckless tackles would be the major talking point of the tournament, with an abundance of yellow and red cards ending the competitive nature of a number of the contests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whilst those tackle laws and sanctions have been the talking point so far, it is for a very different reason, with a number of shots to the head going unpunished – or under-punished – in the first week of the group stage. World Rugby has been efficient in citing these incidents and handing out the requisite punishment, though that has no influence on the result of the game in which the indiscretions were committed.

Reece Hodge’s hit, which caused Fiji’s star forward on the day, Peceli Yato, to leave the field with a concussion, helped swing momentum in that game, and Samoa were lucky for two of their players not to see red against Russia, something which could well have seen the European minnows pick up an unlikely win.

Piers Francis’ high tackle in the opening seconds of England’s game with the USA was also missed live and though few would have predicted a US win, even with England down to 14, it could have had a significant impact on the final Pool C standings.

Unfortunately, the issue of referee and TMO errors reared its head again on Saturday, as Tonga, who fell to a 28-12 loss to Argentina, were denied what seemed a stonewall penalty try for a shoulder charge from Tomas Lavanini, when David Halaifonua had the try line firmly in his sights. Despite having his left arm tucked and making initial contact with the left shoulder, Lavanini went unpunished for the hit.

(Continue reading below…)

Had a penalty try been awarded and Tonga scored their second half try, the scoreline would have been 28-19 to Argentina with 15 minutes left to play, with momentum having swung fully the way of the Sea Eagles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Away from the controversy over the Lavanini hit, Tonga put in a much-improved display from their tournament opener against England, with Telusa Veainu and Maama Vaipulu standing out, as well as the half-back combination of Sonatane Takulua and James Faiva seeming to find their groove. With Veainu’s counter-attacking and incision as a finisher in the starting XV, Tonga looked a much more dangerous outfit than the one that struggled to create any sort of attacking threat against England.

Toutai Kefu’s side now have a welcome eight-day turnaround before facing France in Kumamoto and they showed glimpses against Argentina that they can worry Les Bleus in that game, although the fact a blatant officiating error has cost them a possible losing bonus point, or even an unlikely win, is something which will grate with them – and neutrals – over the coming days.

Rugby is a tough game to referee with its litany of laws and sanctions and when the 50/50 calls go wrong, there can be no great complaint, but unfortunately the clash in Higashiosaka on Saturday bore witness to something that was anything but 50/50.

Watch: RugbyPass exclusive – Tonga: Road to Japan

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search