Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Refereeing blunder blights another World Cup game

David Halaifonua has his try disallowed as he is shoulder charged into touch by Tomas Lavanini. (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Heading into the 2019 Rugby World Cup, there was a concern that the stringent sanctions on high and reckless tackles would be the major talking point of the tournament, with an abundance of yellow and red cards ending the competitive nature of a number of the contests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whilst those tackle laws and sanctions have been the talking point so far, it is for a very different reason, with a number of shots to the head going unpunished – or under-punished – in the first week of the group stage. World Rugby has been efficient in citing these incidents and handing out the requisite punishment, though that has no influence on the result of the game in which the indiscretions were committed.

Reece Hodge’s hit, which caused Fiji’s star forward on the day, Peceli Yato, to leave the field with a concussion, helped swing momentum in that game, and Samoa were lucky for two of their players not to see red against Russia, something which could well have seen the European minnows pick up an unlikely win.

Piers Francis’ high tackle in the opening seconds of England’s game with the USA was also missed live and though few would have predicted a US win, even with England down to 14, it could have had a significant impact on the final Pool C standings.

Unfortunately, the issue of referee and TMO errors reared its head again on Saturday, as Tonga, who fell to a 28-12 loss to Argentina, were denied what seemed a stonewall penalty try for a shoulder charge from Tomas Lavanini, when David Halaifonua had the try line firmly in his sights. Despite having his left arm tucked and making initial contact with the left shoulder, Lavanini went unpunished for the hit.

(Continue reading below…)

Had a penalty try been awarded and Tonga scored their second half try, the scoreline would have been 28-19 to Argentina with 15 minutes left to play, with momentum having swung fully the way of the Sea Eagles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Away from the controversy over the Lavanini hit, Tonga put in a much-improved display from their tournament opener against England, with Telusa Veainu and Maama Vaipulu standing out, as well as the half-back combination of Sonatane Takulua and James Faiva seeming to find their groove. With Veainu’s counter-attacking and incision as a finisher in the starting XV, Tonga looked a much more dangerous outfit than the one that struggled to create any sort of attacking threat against England.

Toutai Kefu’s side now have a welcome eight-day turnaround before facing France in Kumamoto and they showed glimpses against Argentina that they can worry Les Bleus in that game, although the fact a blatant officiating error has cost them a possible losing bonus point, or even an unlikely win, is something which will grate with them – and neutrals – over the coming days.

Rugby is a tough game to referee with its litany of laws and sanctions and when the 50/50 calls go wrong, there can be no great complaint, but unfortunately the clash in Higashiosaka on Saturday bore witness to something that was anything but 50/50.

Watch: RugbyPass exclusive – Tonga: Road to Japan

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 49 minutes ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Two All Blacks praised as 'potential superstars' in France whitewash All Blacks 'unearthed a few potential superstars'