Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RugbyPass Player of the Month January - Daniel du Preez

Even the physical pack of Exeter Chiefs couldn't stop Dan du Preez over the past month. (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

It’s that time of the month again, as we unveil our Player of the Month award winner for January, following stiff competition from a number of quarters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leinster’s Josh van der Flier enjoyed a productive month, whilst Manu Vunipola stood out in a Saracens side that was facing all kinds of adversity. Both Alex Dombrandt and Nathan Hughes also reminded everyone of their England credentials towards the end of January, although it was not enough to see them named in Eddie Jones’ England squad.

One club that had a particularly impressive month was Sale Sharks who, apart from having deprioritised the Heineken Champions Cup, recorded hugely important wins over Harlequins and Exeter Chiefs, propelling themselves up to third and just four points off of league leaders, Exeter.

Plenty of Sale’s contingent have stood up, not least so Jean-Luc du Preez, Rohan Janse van Rensburg and Byron McGuigan, although it’s Jean-Luc’s twin brother, Daniel du Preez, who impressed us the most over the last month. He follows in the footsteps of another dynamic loose forward, Caelan Doris, who picked up the same award in December.

The South African No 8 has been pivotal to delivering the front-foot ball that Sale have thrived with during January and it was particularly notable against Exeter, where he went toe-to-toe with one of the most physical packs in club rugby and came out on top. He prevented Exeter from coming out on top in that typically physical slog on the gain-line and was then able to keep the ball alive and further stretch the Exeter defence with composed passing and offloading after making those initial breaks.

He provided that, to a degree, against Harlequins, although it was the physicality of his defence which really shone in that victory. Quins enjoyed the possession advantage on that day, although there was little they could do with it, as the menacing tackling presence of du Preez denied them any sort of momentum or go forward.

Although rested for the final game of the Champions Cup pool, with Sale already eliminated, du Preez also stood up to be counted in the 30-23 loss to La Rochelle at Stade Marcel Deflandre. As with the two Gallagher Premiership games, it was a case of du Preez physically imposing himself on the opposition and winning the battles as a one-out runner or on the pick and go that other Sale players couldn’t manage on the day.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former Shark has brought an added ball-carrying element to a back row that is gifted with breakdown technicians and grafters in the likes of the Curry twins, Jono Ross and Mark Wilson, and his explosion with the ball in hand will be vital to Sale’s hopes of returning to the Premiership playoffs this season.

With Sale losing Tom Curry to England duty over the next couple of months, du Preez’s influence in the back row will be more important than ever moving forward.

A $100 donation will be made to the charity of du Preez’s choosing as a result of his performances over the past 30 days.

Watch: New Wales head coach Wayne Pivac expects a strong start from his team

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search