Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Runs on the board aren't going to matter as much': Why the Springboks squad for the Lions is wide open for South African players

(Photosport NZ/Raghavan Venugopal)

The late changes to the British & Irish Lions coaching staff ahead have been the talking points of the Lions tour this week, but the Springboks camp has just as many hurdles to jump through in order to get preparations underway.

ADVERTISEMENT

As their former Super Rugby franchises try to find a way into the UK for the Rainbow Cup, concerns over their ability to enter the UK were raised after hearing there would be ‘no guarantee’ of being able to arrive in May given the border restrictions in place.

Whilst their Super teams are yet to know if they will play, the Springboks began their ‘alignment camps’ last week in a number of locations in order to try and put the entire squad on the same page. Despite the difficulties in doing so, former Blues hooker James Parsons speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod believes this allow the squad to hit the ground running.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks reveal their toughest ever opponents | Healthspan Elite

Video Spacer

The All Blacks reveal their toughest ever opponents | Healthspan Elite

“Their alignment camps are split up so they are doing the Sharks in Durban, Stormers in Cape Town and obviously the Japanese players are doing it via Zoom, then they’ve got someone based in the UK doing the UK,” he said.

“So it’s all a little bit separate but I think it’s quite good because they cover their logistics, you get a lot of your game plan imprinted, your language, so you can just wipe off so much admin stuff and get the knowledge down into your books.

“At that level a lot of the players will start visualising and thinking about it so once they do get together, they can actually hit the grass and start running these things pretty much straight away.”

One of the problems the Springboks will have to face is the lack of game time the players have had at the international level after withdrawing from The Rugby Championship in 2020. The squad that won the Rugby World Cup in Japan is nearly two years older, meaning that selections could be based more on form than reputations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Springbok flyhalf Handre Pollard hasn’t played for Montpellier since suffering a serious ACL knee injury in September 2020. He is due to return to action in the coming weeks but will be left with a tight window to prove his fitness for the Lions tour.

World Player of the Year in 2019, Pieter-Steph du Toit endured an injury-ridden 2020 which forced the star to undergo multiple surgeries in a bid to save his career.

With news that Eben Etzebeth will join Lood de Jager and RG Snyman on the sidelines as injured Springbok locks, mystery remains over what the Springboks will look like come July.

“Hard to know how they will select [the squad], because they haven’t seen a lot of footy,” Parsons said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think there is a lot of excitement for the players in that sense as well, so if they are invited to these Zooms or catchups, you are a real chance to play a Lions tour in South Africa if you perform for your club side.

“If you are a form player, you probably have the inside running on selection because you got to pick on form. Runs on the board aren’t going to matter as much because there has been a year in between playing.

“There is so much on offer. If you’ve got a low amount of caps or a high amount of caps, it’s probably not going to matter as much as it normally would.

“There is still a need for experience and reward for things like that, but there is more opportunity than there normally would be I reckon in the current setup.”

One of the form Springboks in the Gallagher Premiership is centre Andre Esterhuizen, who missed the final cut for the World Cup in 2019, could be in contention for a recall following his performances for Harlequins.

The school of thought from Parsons that positions are up for grabs runs opposite to conventional wisdom, with many believing that the 2019 operation will be repeated with many of the same players and game plans. The former All Black highlighted the results from the latest Six Nations tournament that suggest otherwise.

“If you watch the Six Nations, the teams that did so well were actually the teams that had the most exciting game plans and the most flair.

“I believe there will be a lot more innovation, if you look to the 2019 World Cup it was quite a forward-orientated, tactical kicking game plan, physically dominant display. I feel that is has probably changed, based on the Six Nations.

“Wales were really innovative, France although a little inconsistent they were exciting to watch, Scotland played really keep-the-ball-alive kind of footy.

“It’s really hard to comment as we haven’t seen them play for so long, but I’m trying to work out how the British & Irish Lions will play based on what they’ve seen out of the Six Nations and who they are going to pick, and what is the best situation for South Africa to run with.

“Form does have to count.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search