Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

SA Rugby statement: Withdrawal of invitation to a team from Israel

(Photo by Levan Verdzeuli/Getty Images)

An invitation for Tel Aviv Heat, the Israel-based Super Rugby Cup franchise, to participate in a provincial tournament in South Africa has been withdrawn by SA Rugby. It was announced on Monday that the Super Cup finalists, who were defeated by Black Lion of Georgia in December, would be one of five overseas teams that would join six local sides to contest the Mzanzi Challenge from March 24 onwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the news that Tel Aviv had been invited to play in the 11-team tournament wasn’t warmly received and negotiations at SA Rugby level resulted in that invitation being withdrawn on Friday, four days after the plan for the 2023 competition was released. The Israel side will now be replaced by a franchise from Mexico.

A statement read: “SA Rugby announced on Friday that it had withdrawn an invitation to the Tel Aviv Heat to play in the Mzansi Challenge, following representations from multiple stakeholders.
The Israel-based team were scheduled to compete in a competition with four other international teams and six South African provinces from next month.

Video Spacer

Angus Gardner on advantage, scrums and forward passes

Video Spacer

Angus Gardner on advantage, scrums and forward passes

“However, the team was advised on Friday that the invitation had been withdrawn. The Mexican Rhinos have been earmarked to replace them, pending approval by the General Council.

“The Mzansi Challenge kicks off on March 24 with the Diables (Spain), Simbas (Kenya), Rhinos (Mexico), Windhoek Draught Welwitschias (Namibia) and Goshawks (Zimbabwe) joining South African provinces Leopards, Valke, Boland Kavaliers, Eastern Province, Border Bulldogs, and SWD Eagles. An adjusted fixture list will be issued in due course.”

SA Rugby president Mark Alexander said: “We have listened to the opinions of important stakeholder groups and have taken this decision to avoid the likelihood of the competition becoming a source of division, notwithstanding the fact that Israel Is a full member of World Rugby and the IOC.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
M
Mofsowitz 685 days ago

The SA Rugby Union should have first send a fact finding mission to the Occupied oppressed Palestinian territories and seen first hand the oppression of the Zionists against the Palestinians and realised the barbaric mind set of these zionists jews. Apartheid under the whites in south africa was a picnic I say. Desmond Tutu, Human Rights watch, many jewish organizations, Jimmy Carter (ex-president of the usa) and hundreds of fair minded persons have condemned the racism of this worst than apartheid state. Christians should remember that Jesus was born in Palestine and was a Palestinian! This apartheid state has stolen the land of the Palestinians, and continue to do so daily. Please think before doing things that are supporting this illegitimate state. they have ignored scores of UN resolutions and continue to do so.

f
finn 686 days ago

This is very good news. Basic decency should trump membership of the IOC and World Rugby.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search