Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sale recall Tuilagi, Curry while Harlequins include Smith to start

(Photo by Alex Davidson - RFU/Getty Images)

Sale versus Harlequins is primed to be a Friday night blockbuster after the Sharks included Lions back-rower Tom Curry and midfielder Manu Tuilagi in their starting XV to take on defending champions Harlequins, who have included rising star Marcus Smith at out-half following his swashbuckling exploits off the bench.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Alex Sanderson has made a total of seven changes to his starting line-up following the Sale defeat at Gloucester. That includes the return of Bevan Rodd at loosehead and Cobus Wiese in the second row.

Harlequins, meanwhile, have made three changes following their comeback win over Bristol, Smith, James Chisholm and Luke Northmore all included to start on this occasion.

Video Spacer

Is Adam Radwan the fastest rugby player in the world?

Video Spacer

Is Adam Radwan the fastest rugby player in the world?

Scrum coach Adam Jones said: “It’s great to see James back fit and starting this week after a bit of an injury-hit start to his season. Marcus was obviously great off the bench last week and Luke is always a strong performer whenever he pulls on the jersey.

“We have probably started the week with a bit more bounce in our steps off the back of such a great occasion at The Stoop last week, but Sale are a strong team and were semi-finalists last year,” continued the Harlequins assistant.

“They are a big, heavy, aggressive forward pack with a good set-piece. They can play a bit of ball when they need to. It’s a tough place to go as a pack, but we know if we impose ourselves on them, we can challenge them with the way we play.”

SALE: 15. Simon Hammersley; 14. Denny Solomona, 13. Sam James, 12. Manu Tuilagi, 11. Byron McGuigan; 10. Kieran Wilkinson, 9. Raffi Quirke; 1. Bevan Rodd, 2. Curtis Langdon, 3. Nick Schonert, 4. Cobus Wiese, 5. Jean-Luc du Preez, 6. Jono Ross (capt), 7. Tom Curry, 8. Daniel du Preez. Reps:16. Tommy Taylor, 17. Ross Harrison, 18. Oosthuizen, 19. JP du Preez, 20. Cameron Nield, 21. Gus Warr, 22. Tom Curtis, 23. Luke James.

ADVERTISEMENT

HARLEQUINS: 15. Tyrone Green; 14. Joe Marchant, 13. Luke Northmore, 12. Andre Esterhuizen, 11. Cadan Murley; 10. Marcus Smith, 9. Danny Care; 1. Joe Marler, 2. Jack Walker, 3. Simon Kerrod, 4. Matt Symons, 5. Dino Lamb, 6. James Chisholm, 7. Jack Kenningham, 8. Alex Dombrandt (capt). Reps: 16. Sam Riley, 17. Fin Baxter, 18. Will Collier, 19. Hugh Tizard, 20. Tom Lawday, 21. Scott Steele, 22. Huw Jones, 23. Louis Lynagh.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search