Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sale's MacGinty reveals what life will be like for England players under 'intense' Mitchell

AJ MacGinty played under John Mitchell for the USA Eagles

USA Eagles outside half AJ MacGinty has dismissed claims that John Mitchell does not have skills to be England’s new defence coach and predicts his former head coach will be a major success in his new role.

ADVERTISEMENT

MacGinty, the Sale Sharks No.10, worked extensively with Mitchell while the former All Blacks coach was in charge of the Eagles, guiding the team to automatic qualification for next year’s Rugby World Cup in Japan where, ironically, they will now face England along with France, Argentina and Tonga in Pool C.

Now, Mitchell’s coaching style, which earlier in his career led to player revolts at the Western Force and Golden Lions, will be under the microscope again with England having paid the Bulls £200,000 to get their man released by the South African Super Rugby franchise.

MacGinty expects Mitchell to base his defence on the system used by the Hurricanes to win the 2016 Super Rugby title, creating tries with their aggressive hits and turnovers.

MacGinty told RugbyPass; “John is really detailed with the way he sets up his defence and spent a lot of time in New Zealand with the Hurricanes and their defence which helped them win the Super Rugby title. He likes a really aggressive defence and that will be good for England because the Hurricanes scored a lot of tries off that style. He will bring a lot to the England defence.

“I didn’t have a bad word to say about him when he coached the US and while he is intense you need that when you want to play well at the highest level. You need someone on your case. I read some of the stories about him in previous roles and I found it funny and while I can kind of see it, when he was with us he got the balance right. He was really intelligent and always had something to give you to work on. You were constantly learning and he took my game to the next level. I found him very intense on the pitch but off it we all got on well together.”

Continue reading below…
Watch: Eddie Jones explains Cipriani omission

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

MacGinty discovered early that Mitchell has very strong views on strength and conditioning and puts his players through tough sessions. “Post the last World Cup John came in and made it more professional by setting higher standards and asking more of the guys:” added MacGinty who has played in 20 tests and scored 223 points, including 15 in the win over Scotland.

“His big focus was on fitness levels and about us being able to play for 80 minutes. When you don’t have players involved at the highest level and you come up against teams who have guys playing 30 games of professional rugby a season you end up playing well for 40 minutes and then the opposition clicks into another gear.

“John came in and said our fitness levels weren’t good enough and we had some brutal camps with ball in hand and the metres per minute became the focus which was really interesting to see and it helped us a lot. Our standards became really high and we expected a lot from each other and now in the US, there is a professional league and Gary Gold is building on John’s work. He is adding another dimension to our game.

“With foundations that John laid and Gary’s knowledge, things are going really well. I am sure John will be coming up to Sale to see the England boys and I look forward to catching up with him.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Read now: Eight players that could thrive under John Mitchell as England defence coach

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh
Search