Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sam Cane as captain limits the All Blacks' loose forward trio

(Photo by Silvia Lore/Getty Images)

You have to commend the All Blacks selectors for courage, if nothing else.

ADVERTISEMENT

Picking Sam Cane as captain is brave.

It weds you to an openside flanker whose participation is a game-by-game proposition and severely limits your options with the loose trio.

Let’s assume, for argument’s sake, that Cane, Ardie Savea and Akira Ioane are now New Zealand’s first-string line-up.

Video Spacer

Where did the Chiefs come up short? | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

Where did the Chiefs come up short? | The Breakdown

Of the three, two appear there by default.

Cane is captain and has to play somewhere, while Ioane’s probable inclusion in the first test team to play Ireland probably owes a lot to the lack of other options.

It’s a little bit dire, don’t you think?

And rather unfair on Dalton Papalii, who many regard as having been one of Super Rugby Pacific’s better performers.

But in plumping for Cane as captain, the national selectors have rather stymied Papalii’s progress. After all, they couldn’t possibly put him in the same trio as Savea and Cane?

Not after the way the All Blacks were manhandled by Ireland and France a few months ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s just too small a trio to cut it against test rugby’s proper teams.

I don’t want to round on Cane. He hasn’t picked himself.

Durability is not his strong suit and, in the eyes of some, he’s not actually the best player in his position.

We were spoilt by Richie McCaw. He could play through pretty much any injury and there was never any sense that he was a specialist skipper.

He demanded selection and was also the undisputed leader.

We can wish the same for Cane all we like, but there are no comparisons.

I’ve written before that I would install Savea as All Blacks captain. Mostly because his is just about the first name on the team sheet.

ADVERTISEMENT

We saw Sam Whitelock captain the side last year, both with and without Cane in the squad.

My admiration for Whitelock is massive, but he is an ageing player with an incredible number of miles on the clock.

As all eyes inevitably turn to the 2023 Rugby World Cup, can we honestly say Whitelock will be in New Zealand’s best team by then?

In picking Cane to captain the team, the selectors have signalled that he’ll be there in 2023. No matter what kind of juggling act his inclusion necessitates.

I have to say I was rather underwhelmed by this 36-man squad.

I don’t see any justification for picking Hoskins Sotutu, Pita-Gus Sowakula, Karl Tu’inukuafe, Roger Tuivasa-Sheck or Stephen Perofeta, among others.

We waste a lot of time debating the merits of men who’ll only be bit-part players, so I’ll try not to do that here.

But I don’t see Sotutu and Sowakula as blindside flankers or as rivals to Savea for No.8. Much as Savea might be a good openside, Cane’s got that spot sewn up now.

I’m a fan of Tu’inukuafe’s, but given his future lies in French club football, I’d go as far as to call his selection nonsensical.

Most of all, though, I fear for Cane. I fear that – through no fault of his own – he’ll become the unpopular captain playing for an unpopular coach.

People will never stop having reservations about Ian Foster being in charge and those I talk to tend to tar Cane with the coach’s brush.

They see Cane cast in a role for which he’s unsuited, just like Foster has been.

I wish Cane luck. I think his selection as captain causes more problems than it solves, but I wish him well with it.

Maybe he’ll prove to be the player and leader New Zealand needs and maybe he won’t.

Either way, the selectors have ensured the captain will be a continual talking point.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

17 Comments
D
Danny 867 days ago

Cane would be almost first player picked in my test team, as I want someone who can play test quality rugby on field.

B
Brian 883 days ago

As an Irishman, unless you are wanting to go massive in the pack o don't think you need to worry about size in the back row. Ireland will likely line up with Doris, Van de Flier and Conan. They are all fantastic players but they are a quick and nimble group which is the same as all the options NZ have there. I don't see this one being about massive physical dominance on either side but a matter of which team executes their plans better on the day. I am curious about the centre the blues have, no question he is a massive talent but I've not seen enough of him to know how good he might be.

G
Graeme 884 days ago

Tupou Vaai needs to be developed into a full-time loosie. This allows Josh Lord to get into that lock spot. Allowing for more of that desired size that we believe is so necessary for test level.

M
Michael 884 days ago

Above and beyond Foster as a dubios head coach and selector, one would have to be pointing the finger at Grant Fox. I cant help but feel he is the governing influence.
Cane shouldnt even be considerd to be in the team.
He lumbered around the field in the super semi for the short amount of time he was on.
Totally agree he was always some kind of gimmick replacenent for Richie.
Papalii is the pick for 7, more so with Black adder out, but is he free from injury for ireland.
Robinson should have been brought in to replace whitelock, and ekland instead of taylor for hooker. The ekland/robinson lineout combo works.
Good article.

S
Skinny Pins 885 days ago

Another excellent article. Hamish Bidwell is comfortably NZ's most intelligent rugby writer. Foster and Cane are a complete hoax, no question. But more of the spotlight should be put on John Plumtree. This is his forward pack, and just look at it. What an absolute embarrassment. This is what you get when you choose a Hurricanes forwards coach (because they always have good forwards, right?! Oh no, wait...). Clue... if your forwards coach thinks "footwork" and "stepping" are the main prerequisites of a pack of forwards, you don't have the right guy for the job.

D
David 885 days ago

I have to agree with you regarding Cane.He has had too many injuries.He Is taking up a position where a few others should be given a chance to be there,but he is the Captain.In my opinion ,he shouldn't be there at all
.

b
bobsyouruncle 885 days ago

Another miserable article. Mate you don't have to write these articles if you're so negative. So because Hoskins and Pita-Gus aren't as good as Savea (our best player), they shouldn't be picked? Like what are you on about? Are you suggesting if players aren't as good as the incumbent they should never be picked? Injuries exist mate. Hoskins has shown added physicality alongside his amazing ball skills this year. The justification for Pita-Gus is... we need go forward from our pack because our tight 5 apart from Samisoni are really lacking in grunt and ball carrying. Instead of just critiquing the selection of about 6 players, who all (apart from Karl) have shown really good form with obvious reasons for why the selectors would pick them... why don't you suggest some players that should replace them? You're like the date "doesn't mind" where you go out for dinner but says no to every possible option. Its easy to be miserable but we could read a comment on NZHerald or Stuff for the same information as your articles. You need to step your game up just as much as Fozzie.

D
DarstedlyDan 885 days ago

Completely agree with you regarding Tu’inukuafe. He won’t be in the WC squad - so why on earth was he picked? Unfortunately more muddled thinking from Foster & co.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 15 minutes ago
South Africa will beat England at a canter

You forget that this was the 3rd Test between the AB's and the English this year. They were prepared and they knew how to keep NZ quiet. The Boks is not NZ.


The Boks is a whole other level. You overestimate England and underestimate the Boks. Clearly you haven't really looked at the teams. Besides the Irish games earlier this year, the Boks have mainly used experimental sides, even against the AB's.


Now they have chosen their best team available. They have targeted this game. The Boks mean business. Man for man, this Bok team is better. In strategy and player abilities there is no comparison and they are outmatched.


There isn't just monster strength, but unreal speed. In broken play there is currently no better team as well as defensively, not to even talk about the attacking threat, both from front and the back.


I'd say read between the lines, see what everyone is seeing, but clearly you are wearing blinders and is also putting too much emphasis on an AB's team the Boks beat twice this year, the same AB's that beaten England 3 times this year.


When Rassie gets serious, the players become machines. There is no stopping them. That bench is loaded with players that is fast, strong and have exceptional skills. This is a team not many teams will face before the 2027 WC, because the Boks doesn't use their best between WC's in one game. All experimental.


You will be proven wrong on Saturday and then you will wonder how you could have been so wrong. This Bok team means serious business. They came to conquer and not just by a close score. They want to demolish and they will. This England team at most is a 60 min team. Against the Boks that just won't cut it

13 Go to comments
H
Hellhound 30 minutes ago
South Africa will beat England at a canter

Not bizarre, but needed. Everyone usually lifts their game against the Boks. Now instead of facing reality, they prefer to live in the past and look hopefully toward the score of the WC semi, hoping they can recreate that result and by some miracle snatch a victory.


It's better than the alternative knowing what is going to happen. Especially looking at the experimental squads the Boks put up against the Wallabies in the RC, not using their best team. That same Wallabies beat them last week.


Now the Boks isn't using an experimental squad. They put out as close to the strongest team the Boks have available at the moment. That must scare the pants off of them. If an experimental squad can destroy the Wallabies, what would the strongest team be able to do to the English?


Instead of sinking into dispear, they prefer to hope that their players can match the Boks. Even though they know what is coming. The English are scared and they won't show it.


Now imagine how Wales must feel knowing they are up next weekend? They don't even have the dubious record of at least close losses like the English. It's a complete nightmare for these 2 countries and rightly so.


The Boks usually take the pedal of the medal post WC's, but not this Bok team. They are better than the WC winning Boks of both '19 and '23. They are stronger up front. They are faster at the back. They can hit front and back. In broken play they are the most dangerous team. They have the best defence and attack also scoring the most tries.


In a way I feel sorry for both the English and Wales. Only those with blinders on expects a close game. Looking at both teams man to man, strategy to strategy, play to play, they are so outmatched it would be a joke if it wasn't so serious. We need the NH to be strong and we need the gap to become closer in rugby so the game stay exciting because runaway scores sometimes is fun, but it doesn't bring as much joy as a close game won.

13 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Springboks make 12 changes and move away from 7/1 bench split Springboks make 12 changes and move away from 7/1 bench split
Search