Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sam Underhill becomes third England forward to drop out of Six Nations squad

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

England boss Eddie Jones has been forced to make a further alteration to his Guinness Six Nations squad, calling up Jack Willis from his twelve-strong shadow squad to replace Sam Underhill in the 28-strong squad announced for the tournament last Friday. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Jones lost two of original 28 on Monday when it emerged that Joe Marler (personal reasons) and Joe Launchbury (leg injury) had pulled out and would be respectively replaced by Tom West and Charlie Ewels.

Now a third forward will be absent when the squad assembles this Wednesday at St George’s Park, openside Underhill suffering a hip injury and making way for Willis who was a controversial omission last week from the slimmed-down squad initially announced by Jones, who had agreed with the RFU to the reduced size of 28 to limit movement of players in and out of the squad

Video Spacer

New Scotland pick Cameron Redpath guests on RugbyPass All Access

Video Spacer

New Scotland pick Cameron Redpath guests on RugbyPass All Access

An RFU statement on the latest squad change read: “Sam Underhill has withdrawn from the England squad for the Guinness Six Nations with a hip injury. Wasps’ Jack Willis has been called up to Eddie Jones’ side for the tournament.

“The squad will meet at St George’s Park on Wednesday as they begin preparations for the tournament. England’s first game is against Scotland at Twickenham Stadium on Saturday, February 6. Alec Hepburn, Lewis Ludlam and David Ribbans have been added to the shadow squad.”

Bath director of rugby Stuart Hooper later confirmed Underhill will be back before the end of the Six Nations. “It’s disappointing for him but the outlook is pretty positive. We’re talking weeks more than anything else,” he said. “He picked it up against Wasps earlier this month and it probably has been a bit of a niggle for him. He was assessed this morning [Tuesday] by the England medics and the decision was made.

“He has been in great form and has delivered some top performances. We know the destructive nature of Sam’s game and the ability he’s got on both sides of the ball now, with carrying and defence. Like everybody else, he has been disjointed and hasn’t had the opportunity to go week to week, which gets him in a really good groove. This injury is a setback but he’ll come back to us and get the very best treatment.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

119 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search