Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sam Underhill cementing himself as All Blacks' budding bogeyman

Sam Underhill on the charge against New Zealand in Yokohama (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

From minute zero to minute 80, England were ruthlessly dominant over New Zealand in their World Cup semi-final and if one man encapsulated the vice-like grip England had on the All Blacks, it was openside flanker Sam Underhill.

ADVERTISEMENT

As soon as England took to the pitch and confronted the haka with their own V-shaped formation, things just went from bad to worse for the reigning world champions. An action, it is likely, that England and the RFU will be fined for, though that won’t worry Eddie Jones and his charges at all.

It was not intended to be disrespectful and captain Owen Farrell was quick to point that out in the press conference after the game, insisting that they “wanted to keep a respectful distance but we didn’t want to just stand in a flat line and let them come at us”.

Whether teams should be allowed to challenge the haka or not is a whole other debate, though to insist teams stand there idly and watch it surely only detracts from the fact the haka is, in itself, a challenge. It also turns it into a spectacle or sideshow rather than the storied sporting tradition it has become and what it is supposed to represent.

Regardless, England’s flanking motion, whether intended or not, set the tone from the beginning. Their refusal to move when asked to by the officials was reminiscent of Martin Johnson’s side similar refusal in Ireland all those years ago – thankfully without the political disrespect – and the advancing steps of Joe Marler and the mischievous smile on Farrell’s face were unerringly prophetic of what was to come.

(Continue reading below…)

What ensued was, to be frank, the first genuinely 80-minute performance of Jones’ tenure as England head coach and one of the few in international rugby over the last cycle. We have seen excellent performances under Jones for 50, 60 or even 70 minutes at a time, but to remain that focused and consistent for every minute of the match just doesn’t happen that regularly, no matter how good the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Against New Zealand, there was no relenting, there were no slow starts or sloppy finishes. The one moment when things went wrong for England, the lineout that was missed which Ardie Savea happily snared before powering over the try line, was really the only loss of control England had in the game.

They were guilty of a little profligacy in attack but given the fast start they made and the foot they put on New Zealand’s throat early, those two or three potentially missed tries were irrelevant. How often can you say that against the All Blacks?

Underhill’s chalked off try was fair enough. Tom Curry had overrun his line and it was a clear case of crossing that allowed Kyle Sinckler to take the space and then feed Underhill through the gap in New Zealand’s defence. The Jonny May break from the Manu Tuilagi interception was another that could have ended in glory on another day. Fresh back from a hamstring injury, something which seemed to sideline him early in the second half, May’s top-end pace didn’t look to be quite there.

Then there was Ben Youngs’ disallowed score. It was a quickly-made decision by the TMO and one that, after a number of viewings, still baffled. The ball was bobbled in the maul by Jamie George and then seemingly recovered by the hooker before it touched the ground. It was ruled out for a forward pass but, if there was one, it was extremely hard to see.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having got themselves ahead early through a Tuilagi try that came off as precise and energetic a start as England could have hoped for, Underhill went to work on a New Zealand side that had no answer to him prospering at the breakdown. He was instrumental in delivering two turnovers but his impact there went beyond the base numbers. He was slowing down New Zealand’s ball at all possible opportunities and was one of the first to the contact area when England had possession, helping deliver quick and secure ball for Youngs to work with.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

Eddie Jones or Emilio Estevez #ENGvNZL #nzrugby #allblacks #englandrugby

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass) on

Alongside Curry and Maro Itoje, in particular, Underhill and England dominated the battle on the floor, a contest which they do not have the best of histories in against New Zealand. His efforts prompted the introduction of Sam Cane at half time and as if sensing an evening of the odds, Underhill went to work in another area, the tackle.

The Bath flanker proceeded to make three of the most dominant, technically-precise tackles you are ever likely to see in international rugby. He stayed low, had his head placed perfectly to the side and drove up and through the New Zealand carriers, taking them off their feet and barrelling them backwards, without ever taking them beyond the horizontal. If you’re teaching young rugby players to ‘win collisions’, those are the videos you should show them.

Perhaps a symptom of the head injuries he picked up early in his professional career, injuries which left him sidelined for a significant period of time, Underhill was the perfect poster boy on Saturday for how tackling low is not only safer in terms of risk of concussion, it is every bit as effective in stopping opposition attacks. More stringent sanctions on high tackles are sanitising or diluting the physicality in rugby? Please, go and watch the game again.

New Zealand, who usually have such success getting over the gain line, extending phases and evading tackles, just couldn’t get away from England’s stranglehold, with Underhill the spearhead of a defensive performance for the ages. His physicality was thrilling for the neutrals and he consistently sapped New Zealand of any momentum they may have been building.

The All Blacks’ 19 turnovers and 11 penalties conceded will linger with them well into the next cycle and the build-up to the 2023 World Cup. Additionally, for the second week in a row, the hire of John Mitchell as England’s defence coach has looked to be the finishing touch that the side needed to bring them to within 80 minutes of lifting their second-ever World Cup title.

As for Underhill, he is rapidly becoming a player that New Zealand will have the utmost respect for. He led the way in England’s 15-16 loss to the All Blacks at Twickenham last year and though he was on the wrong side of the result that day, he was the pick of England’s impressive effort.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

Four years in the making that performance. #RugbyWorldCup #NZLvsENG

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass) on

On Saturday, he went a step further and secured his first win against New Zealand. At just 23 years of age and bearing in mind the age profile of the rest of the England team, you wouldn’t bet against it being his last win over them either.

England will now look forward to enjoying a bit of downtime and watching Sunday’s clash between South Africa and Wales safe in the knowledge that if – and it is a considerable if – they can replicate that performance against New Zealand again next week, they will put themselves in a very good position to lift the Webb Ellis Trophy.

As appetising as an all-northern hemisphere final would be for England fans, and it would be the first time the World Cup would see one, the lure of a game against South Africa and potentially pursuing a clean sweep of the southern hemisphere’s “big three” in the knockout rounds could see this group even surpass the exploits of the vintage of 2003.

For now, though, pity the poor blokes who have to line-up opposite Underhill in training.

WATCH: Steve Hansen reflects on New Zealand’s loss to England

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 7 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

ould really devalue the competition unless there is a way to incentivise performance, e.g. by allowing teams that do well one year to directly qualify for the next year's competition.

So your intention is that teams prioritize those games because it's going to be more reliable way to remain in Champions than league performance. Say in your predicted case where England has 8 strong teams, only four are going to gain automatic entry, so the other four are going to stay up by doing well enough in Champions Cup pool games.


I would be interested on just how many teams would have gone out of contention in the last few years using your system, my thought is that it would not be a lot. Winning a quarter of your games might be enough to remain in it each year. It greatly depends one how much the leagues fluctuate, and I see that becoming less and less.

the appeal of pools of 4, but 6 pool games might not go down well with the French or the South Africans given already cramped schedules.

This is more of a suggestion for NBs new article on SA but I'd argue more pool games mean its easier to have a structure based on region system where say all of the SA teams that qualified are in the same pool, and you can play all those away games against them consecutively. Then return home and they come to you etc.


I don't think its necessarily needed as I think it would be quite easy for EPCR to take into account/do in conjunction with each leagues fixture list. To me, pool play should be sort to just acheive a ranking system. The bottom team of each pool is kicked out or 'culled' (perhaps to Challenge Cup, I'm fond of that exchange), but the fixtures then go into consecutive knockouts of home/away fixtures, say 1 v 16, then go thru to 1 v 8(or worst seed of the other winners etc) home/away, 1v4, etc etc. Maybe the Semi's onwards are 'neutral' fixtures and those last three games are just do or die fixtures?

124 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

It's just an endemic problem within EPCR. Glasgow threw away the game on the weekend too by resting players. Those sorts of crazy results are all over tournament.


The closest knockout result in 23' was a 14 point win. 24' had a 1, 3 and 12 point margin games, the rest all 30/40 point thrashings by the home team. In every single game.

“We are not disrespecting [the tournament], but we need to get ourselves into a better position. I don’t know how we solve it. It’s like being invited to someone’s birthday party, then complaining about the chips. We are so grateful to be here.

Haha that's a great line, thanks for the share.


The issue is not really solving the itinerary for South African teams, that is easy, the problem is solving it for the teams that are required to come back from South Africa and win the following week. The perfect example of this was La Rochelle last year having to beat Stormers away and then return for a day to France before heading off to Dublin. They consequently but unsurprising got spanked. It's the same problem Super Rugby created when it required higher ranking sides to travel to another countries top team at the pointy end of the season.


As has been discussed in a recent article about England having too many teams in EPCR, the problems are many and varied in general. Combining EPCR and league games into a signle itinerary/season is no problem, both comps simply need to get together at planning stage and be prepared to have flexible weekends where the two comps are swapped around, but is it going to be as easy to suggest that the EPCR just needs a week off from the Ro16 stage to Quarters (or pool to Ro16 I can remember which it was)? What if that LaRvStomers game was a quarter, when is the semi, or the final going to be played?


South Africa's future is, of course, in South Africa. There is talk of a group wanting to create a Super League in America, touring big cities, no doubt some in the Middle East being included, in a World Series type format of the games biggest stars. It's a terrible idea by itself, but especially when there is already Europe, the ME, and all of Africa crying out for more high level rugby, and South Africa's huge abundance of players that can provide it.

21 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
Search