Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Sam will be unlikely because he is going to be having an op'

(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Sam Simmonds has been described by his Exeter boss Rob Baxter as unlikely to tour this summer with England as he is due to have an operation to alleviate the pain he has with a niggly hip. The 27-year-old has played a part in the last seven England matches, ending a period out of favour under Eddie Jones that stretched back to his previous appearances in March 2018. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Record-breaking try-scoring exploits last season for Exeter catapulted Simmonds into the Lions squad that toured South Africa last year ahead of his England recall but he has been sidelined since missing his club’s mid-April Heineken Champions Cup round of 16 exit to Munster in Limerick. 

That evening at Thomond Park, Exeter coach Baxter said: “It’s a hip/groin, a combination of a few things. He is sore, he is struggling to train really and that is the problem. We can get him on the field but he is very limited in training which fitness-wise and performance-wise, he is kind of on that downward spiral until we can sort this issue out

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 13 | Sky Sport NZ

Video Spacer

The Breakdown | Episode 13 | Sky Sport NZ

“We are investigating that now, he will see the specialist this week but with all the scans and things, we are hopeful we will see him before the end of the season.”

Those hopes have evaporated as far as Exeter are concerned as they have just two Gallagher Premiership games remaining and face their season ending on June 4 without reaching the playoffs. England, meanwhile, are not due to head to Australia until after their June 19 match versus the Barbarians at Twickenham. 

Related

Baxter didn’t 100 per cent rule Simmonds out from England tour selection, but he was keen to play up the positives for his player if he didn’t travel to Australia. “Sam will be unlikely (to tour) because he is going to be having an op,” explained the Exeter director of rugby at his media briefing ahead of Friday’s league trip to Bristol.

“There are two ways of looking at it. What it will allow him to do is get this niggly hip injury that has been causing him pain – the restrictive thing has been the pain not so much the function – and if he gets this sorted now that means he will have a good recovery time and a good pre-season and it’s a huge year for anybody who has got international ambitions with next year being World Cup year. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It will really help him get to the level when you talk about from a club perspective level, a couple of years ago he was banging tries in from everywhere. He will want to follow that through because that is what led to his international and his Lions recognition. No one thing is ever a bad or good thing, you just have to drive it in a more positive direction.”

Baxter was speaking on a day when the 36-man squad for next week’s mini-England training camp was revealed to contain not a single Exeter player. Ten clubs were represented but with injuries to Simmonds, Luke Cowan-Dickie, Jack Nowell and Jonny Hill hitting the Chiefs hard and Henry Slade rested, Exeter, Gloucester and Worcester didn’t get a Test squad look-in with Jones this time. 

“Luke Cowan-Dickie has got a good chance of kind of being ready for the end stage of the season so in all possibility could still tour,” reckoned Baxter. “As far as we are looking at it they [Nowell and Hill] will be with England for some rehab and for someone to have a look at them early next week. 

“They are progressing pretty well at the moment. If that progression continues there is no reason why (not). The tour is still a little way away. The last round of the Premiership isn’t until a couple of weeks and then you have got semi-final and final before the tour heads off. It’s still over a month before the tour heads off, so they have still got a decent amount of rehab time before those decisions need to be made.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Cowan-Dickie needed an operation following his knee injury playing for England against Wales in late February, Nowell also required surgery on a broken arm suffered in the mid-March Test in France while Hill has been unavailable since picking up a high ankle injury with Exeter in January.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 19 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

303 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING World Cup-winning halfback on Cam Roigard’s substitution in France loss World Cup-winning halfback on Cam Roigard’s substitution vs. France
Search