Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Samoa and Tonga had the option of playing last week's game elsewhere - but turned it down

Apia Park disintegrated into a muddy bog in July during Samoa's 25-17 win over Tonga in the Pacific Nations Cup (Photo from Twitter)

After last weekend’s match between Samoa and Tonga at Apia Park, players and fans alike were quick to take to social media to criticise the conditions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Apia Park was already awash with water before the match even kicked off, but the field regressed into a muddy, swampy turf that more closely resembled what you would expect to see at the local club rugby grounds, not the kind of surface that two international sides should be playing on.

Tongan representatives Cooper Vuna and Sam Louise both posted on Twitter, criticising World Rugby for letting the match take place at all.

Vuna, in particular, questioned what sort of processes World Rugby undertook to confirm that the ground was safe for the match to take place on.

Pacific Rugby Players’ Association CEO Aayden Clarke has revealed, however, that World Rugby was more than happy to arrange an alternative pitch for the match. With there being no better stadiums in Samoa or Tonga, however, the match would have to have been taken outside of the Pacific – likely to New Zealand.

“It was about a week out that World Rugby actually called and said they have got some concerns around the weather scheduled for it and obviously the wear and tear that the park may have, so we looked at contingency options then,” Clarke said.

“But it was really important that Samoa had the opportunity to engage with the community and that week was really, really successful – it was just a pity that especially on game-day the heavy rain continued to fall.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“There was a third option that it was played in a different country, but nobody wanted that to happen and I think I can speak for the Tongans as well because they understand the importance of engaging with the community.

“In the end the weather just really was not favourable leading into it, through the Pacific Games and from the information that I’ve received the Samoa Rugby Union, the ground staff, everybody went to every effort to try and get that park ready but in the end it just wasn’t able to sustain it.”

Understandably, both the Samoan and Tongan unions and players wanted to keep the game within their communities, which left the sides with few options where to play the match.

The field was inspected on game day and both teams were briefed on the conditions. The option of abandoning the game was always available, should the referee deem that the surface was unplayable during the game. Neither Samoa coach Steve Jackson nor Tonga coach Toutai Kefu raised any objections to the continuation of the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

“While the conditions were not optimal owing to extremely adverse weather and the playing of the Pacific Games competitions the week prior, the match official team deemed the surface playable prior to the match. The same inspection standards were applied as with any test match,” said World Rugby’s Pacific Nations Cup Tournament Director Michael Groom.

Whilst the two sides can perhaps not take too much umbrage with the game going ahead, it’s worth asking the question as to why Apia Park was in such poor condition over the weekend. Obviously the weather in the lead up to the game was awful, but modern day pitches should have the proper infrastructure to deal with heavy rainfall.

“The big difference here is the difference between tier one and tier two infrastructure and facilities,” said Clarke.

“The SRU have already made comments around trying to make improvements at Apia Park in the future and the game on the weekend really highlighted probably what was needed.”

“I think what’s positive is it will start conversations between different governments around exactly how we improve the infrastructure of the stadiums.

“The players are as aware as anybody of the huge role that rugby plays within the communities and the huge benefit for not just business but morale in the communities to have their stars and their idols playing test matches in their home countries.”

Tonga are in Japan for their match with the Brave Blossoms this weekend whilst Samoa are based in Fiji for the next two weeks. Tonga will host Canada in Lautoka next weekend.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tommy B. 3 hours ago
Rassie Erasmus wades into heated debate over Jaden Hendrikse antics

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

I’ll go with one more because it’s so funny but then I must stop. There’s only so long you can talk to the nutter on the bus.

There is no legal impediment in the GFA to ANY form of border. It’s mentioned very briefly and ambiguously but even then there’s a caveat ‘if the security situation permits’ which is decided by the British government as the border is an internationally, UN recognised formal border between sovereign states. Now, you can argue that this is because it was assumed it would always be in the EU context - but we all know the issue with ‘assumption’. As to your hilarious drivel about what you think is in the GFA, you clearly haven’t read it or at best not understood it. There are still 1,580 British Army troops in NI. The legal status of NI as part of the UK is unchanged.

So, there was a problem for those that wanted to use the border to complicate any future British government changing regulations and trade arrangements through domestic legislation. Hence ‘hard border’ became ANYTHING that wasn’t a totally open border.

This allowed the EU and their fanatical Remainer British counterparts to imply that any form of administration AT the border was a ‘hard border.’ Soldiers with machine guns? Hard border. Old bloke with clipboard checking the load of every 200th lorry? Hard border. Anything in between? Hard Border. They could then use Gerry’s implicit threats to any ‘border officials’ to ensure that there would be an unique arrangement so that if any future parliament tried to change trade or administrative regulations for any part of the UK (which the EU was very worried about) some fanatical Remainer MP could stand up and say - ‘this complicates the situation in NI.’

You’ve just had a free lesson in the complex politics that went WAY over your head at the time. You’re welcome.

Now, I must slowly back out of the room, and bid you good day, as you’re clearly a nutter.

584 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Brendan Fanning: 'Lancaster is unique in the list of Connacht coaches that will have an immediately positive effect on morale' Brendan Fanning: 'Lancaster is unique in the list of Connacht coaches that will have an immediately positive effect on morale'
Search