Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

SANZAAR statement: Savea banned following throat-slitting gesture

(Photo by William West/AFP via Getty Images)

All Blacks back-rower Ardie Savea has copped a ban following his throat-slitting gesture towards a Rebels player during last weekend’s Super Rugby win by the Hurricanes in Melbourne. The Hurricanes skipper was yellow-carded for his involvement in a first-half scuffle and he apologised for his subsequent gesture both on live TV and in person post-game with the Rebels player he had targetted.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, despite that post-game acknowledgment, Savea was still cited for the incident and has now paid a disciplinary price, his one-game ban seeing him miss this coming weekend’s home match for the Hurricanes versus the Blues.

A statement read: “A SANZAAR judicial committee hearing has found Ardie Savea of the Hurricanes in breach of SANZAAR disciplinary rule 6.1. Savea received a yellow card, for an offence against law 9.27 in the 40th minute of the match between the Rebels and Hurricanes at AAMI Park on March 3.

Video Spacer

The game that made Maro Itoje a superstar in rugby

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 2:55
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 2:55
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    The game that made Maro Itoje a superstar in rugby

    “Following the match, Savea was cited for a separate incident occurring immediately after the first offence – again under law 9.27: A player must not do anything that is against the spirit of good sportsmanship.

    “The SANZAAR judicial committee of Nigel Hampton KC (chair), Mike Mika and David Croft assessed the citing case and in his finding, judicial committee chairman Hampton ruled the following: Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including from the player and submissions from his legal representative, Aaron Lloyd, the judicial committee found the foul play did not breach the red card threshold.

    Related

    “With respect to sanction the judicial committee deemed the act of foul play merited a warning as it was close to but did not breach the red card threshold. Savea was issued with a warning from the judicial committee with regard to this incident. As a result of this, that meant that he received a yellow card and a warning from the same match.

    “SANZAAR disciplinary rule 6.1 states: If a player has received two warnings or a combination of a warning and a yellow card during a match, he shall be treated for disciplinary purposes as if he had been sent off. Therefore, Ardie Savea was required to reappear before the SANZAAR foul play review committee as a result of his persistent offending.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “In order to expedite and preserve the proper judicial process and with the agreement of all parties, the same committee members reconvened to sit as a foul play review committee and review the breach of SANZAAR disciplinary rule 6.1.

    “In his finding, Hampton ruled: The foul play review committee conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence and oral submissions from Savea’s legal representative.

    “With respect to sanction the foul play review committee ruled after considering a number of factors, including the guidance of World Rugby regulation 17 appendix 4, and due to the nature of the player’s persistent offending with both the yellow card and the warning being issued for unsportsmanlike play, that an appropriate sanction for the player would be a suspension of one week. That was accepted by the player he is therefore suspended up to and including Saturday, March 11.”

    ADVERTISEMENT
    LIVE

    Rugby Americas North Men's U19 XV's | Day 2

    KOKO Show | July 8th | Bernard Foley stops by to talk the Wallabies winning and Lions being tested

    England v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Georgia vs Ireland | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

    Lions Share | Episode 2

    Chile vs Romania | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

    USA vs Belgium | Men’s International | Full Match Replay

    Touchdown in Dublin, The Red Sea Returns & We Prepare to Face Argentina | Ep 2: The Ultimate Test

    South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 2009 | Second Test | The Vaults

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    1 Comment
    A
    Andrew 855 days ago

    One of the most pathetic episodes ever for the media and citing committee. They should hang their heads in shame. This puerile nonsense must not happen again.

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    t
    takata 1 hour ago
    Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

    Please, tell me who exactly are all those millionaires owning the Top 14?


    And, by the way, can you tell me who are also those that ever transformed a single French club into their cash cow?


    It’s probably an old cliché comming from, some time ago in early pro time, the revival of both Ile-de-France clubs by private investors like J. Lorenzetti at Racing 92, or the rise of Toulon’s “Gallacticos” under Mourad Boudjellal, ending with the very noisy late Altrad investments into Montpellier-Hérault. Even if a few major titles were collected by those clubs, and that it would indeniably have helped to rise the fame of the whole Top 14, the global return on private investments simply didn’t ever pay back what they put in.


    Another look into the last decade will show you that French clubs are not millionaires pet-projects either. From this season top 6, amongst Stade Toulousain (1st), Union Bordeaux-Bègles (2nd), Rugby Club Toulonnais (3rd), l’Aviron Bayonnais (4th), Clermont-Auvergne (5th) and Castres Olympique (6th), only the last two are backed by historical corporate entities: Michelin (tires) for Clermont and Laboratoires Pierre Fabre (pharma) for Castres.


    That’s long term sponsorship from those city main industries and, with Stade Toulousain since 1907, Clermont and Castres (one of the lowest budget in Top 14), are also the oldest members of the French rugby club elite. This certainly prove some healthy stability in their management. They are in fact as far away from marketing “products” that they are from Paris.


    But in Top 14, as reflected by their national team selection, club power is certainly measured by their success. The most successful of them all, Stade Toulousain, reached a 2023-2024 budget comparable with the lower end of a French elite football club (those not named PSG) and half of it’s income (€30 millions) was comming from merchandising sales only. Last monday, UBB sold out, in a matter of few hours, its 20K season ticket (out of their 32K seats stadium) and La Rochelle’s stadium was also sold out faster than I can type it for every single game of last season; and so on.


    Now, take only those three clubs providing 90% of the national team and paying 100% of their wages. Tell them that the share of the limited game time allowed to their top players, will rise from 25% to 40% for the national team, without any further compensation for the club than allowing them to spend more in recruitment (of probably lesser quality substitutes).


    See how it goes now with their board and Presidents, even if probably all of them are turning real profits.

    301 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING Record highs and lows as World Rugby Rankings get shaken up Record highs and lows as World Rugby Rankings get shaken up
    Search