Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Saracens' Andy Christie out for the season, but handed Scotland hope

Saracens' Andy Christie during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Harlequins and Saracens at The Stoop on November 18, 2023 in London, England. (Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Saracens have confirmed that flanker Andy Christie will be out of action for twelve weeks after breaking his arm against Northampton Saints on Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Scotland international played the entire 80 minutes at Franklin’s Gardens despite the injury as Saracens fell to the Gallagher Premiership leaders, and will now require surgery on his arm.

Despite this impediment, Christie still managed a match-high 23 tackles, and made the second-most carries in the contest.

Video Spacer

Ardie Savea on New Zealand Rugby’s eligibility rules for the All Blacks

Video Spacer

Ardie Savea on New Zealand Rugby’s eligibility rules for the All Blacks

The 25-year-old has been in the form of his life this season for the London outfit, which led to him forcing his way into Gregor Townsend’s starting XV for the first time during the Guinness Six Nations.

His absence will be a huge blow to Sarries not only with an Investec Champions Cup round of 16 clash against Bordeaux-Begles on Saturday, but with four rounds of the Premiership season still remaining.

While a twelve-week lay-off will end Christie’s campaign with Saracens prematurely, he is likely to be fit for Scotland’s July internationals, where they face Canada, the USA, Chile and Uruguay.

Following a 52-7 win over Harlequins at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in the Premiership’s return, Saracens crashed back down to Earth against the Saints, who themselves had lost 52-21 to Bristol Bears the week before.

ADVERTISEMENT

After the result, Saracens director of rugby Mark McCall bemoaned how some of his players were a “little bit off” at Franklin’s Gardens.

“Last week, we saw when everyone was at it and engaged, what we are capable of,” he said.

“There are some who were at it and some who were a little bit off and, against a good team like Northampton, you pay for that.

“We showed some grit in both halves, to fight back from 17-0 down and from 27-13 to 27-20. We were in the game but never really felt we had control of it.

“Overall, it’s a good lesson for us that if we want to do what we want to do, we have got to have everyone right at it. I don’t know (how crucial the try bonus point will be), but we showed some grit and skill at the end to get an unlikely point from it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But I wouldn’t want that to get away from our disappointment at setting ourselves a target of stepping up a level today and I don’t think we achieved that.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search