Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Dean Richards' pointed warning to Championship-bound Saracens

Dean Richards prowls the sidelines (Photo by Getty Images)

Dean Richards, whose Newcastle team are nine points clear at the top of the English Championship, has warned relegated Saracens they will need a spine of experienced players to ensure an immediate return to the Gallagher Premiership.

ADVERTISEMENT

Richards took Harlequins back up to the top flight of the English game in 2006 and is on course to do the same with Newcastle whose relegation last season saw them loan England flanker Mark Wilson to Sale for twelve months while other players opted to leave including Chris Harris (Gloucester), Simon Hammersley (Sale) and Niki Goneva (Harlequins).

However, Newcastle retained experienced Test players such as England No10 Toby Flood, Samoa prop Logovi’i Mulipola and Tonga scrum-half Sonatane Takulua to deal with the dangers lurking in the second tier of English rugby.

Saracens’ 45-strong squad will have individual interviews over the next two days with Mark McCall, the director of rugby, and acting CEO Edward Griffiths as the disgraced English and European champions work out what kind of squad will be possible for the promotion challenge next season.

Key players such as Owen Farrell, Maro Itoje and Billy and Mako Vunipola may need to be playing Premiership level rugby to keep their England places and stay on course for inclusion in the British and Irish Lions tour to South Africa in 2021.

(Continue reading below…)

Mark McCall confirms Saracens’ squad will be broken up

Video Spacer

Richards saw his men defeat struggling Yorkshire Carnegie 36-10 in a near-deserted Headingley Stadium on Sunday. He told RugbyPass: “There are a lot of old pros in the Championship and unless you have that understanding of how to play the game in this league then you could struggle, particularly with a load of kids. The old pros in the Championships know how to control a game and play the referee and are adaptable which means they can exploit any chink in your armour.

“You need strength across the board and if you don’t then you will struggle. If you had told me at the start of the season we would be replacing Saracens if we got promotion, I would have been totally surprised. We didn’t beat them in the Premiership and they had that strength come off the bench which caused us a few problems. The Premiership will evolve and move on with or without Saracens in 18 months – that’s life.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Will Richards be looking to pick up any Saracens players who want to remain in the Premiership next season? “You have look at things closely and you cannot front-load things. If people come available at the right price then we will look at them. It has to be pretty cheap from that point of things.”

Richards was delighted to retain the majority of players he wanted to help Newcastle’s promotion bid and is using the experience he gained guiding Harlequins back into the Premiership, although the loss of some key squad members had to be expected. “Such is the culture we have in the squad we retained the majority of players we wanted and Mark Wilson will come back from his loan to Sale next season. It means we have the nucleus of the side that played in the Premiership and we understand how to play at that level.

“For the clubs (in the Championship) these games are their cup finals and they want to knock us off our perch. In an odd way playing in the Championship means a more competitive lineout battle and other areas with some of the teams a bit bigger and more robust. There are some good teams in this league and with a bit more vision and will to play they could cause a lot of Premiership teams problems.

ADVERTISEMENT
Saracens warning
Headingley Stadium was near-deserted on Sunday for Newcastle’s visit 

“It has been an eye-opener for us and a lot of boys thought we would come straight back up and it wouldn’t be too difficult. However, there have been a lot of tough games – at Bedford and London Scottish in constant rain and there are a lot of levellers in the Championship.“

Saracens, as RugbyPass revealed on Saturday, recognise the “Galacticos” who currently make up their squad will be broken up due to the need to reduce the wage bill which saw them relegated after breaking the salary cap for four seasons.

After defeating Racing 92 to earn a quarter-final place as they defend their Heineken Champions Cup title, McCall admitted: “Every player has got a slightly different situation. We will also have to talk to Eddie Jones and see what he thinks in terms of his established players from Saracens and the younger ones.

“Is he prepared for people to be playing in the Championship? Someone like Ben Earl we’d like to keep at the club for the next five years, but he’s so close to getting on the England team.”

WATCH: Andy Goode and Brendan Venter didn’t hold back on this week’s The Rugby Pod as they discussed Saracens and the salary cap scandal

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 35 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
Search