Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Saracens player ratings vs Stade Francais | Investec Champions Cup

Liam Williams of Saracens celebrates with team mates after scoring their first try during the Investec Champions Cup match between Stade Francais Paris and Saracens at Stade Jean Bouin on December 15, 2024 in Paris, France. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Saracens player ratings: Saracens claimed a hard-fought 28-17 Champions Cup victory over Stade Français in Paris, although they were helped by some brain-rot ill-discipline from the home side.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how they rated:

1. Rhys Carre – 6
A mixed bag from the 132kg loosehead. Conceded a yellow card for leading with the elbow with a carry, but made his presence felt in the scrum before his departure.

2. Jamie George – 8
Rumbled over from a maul with all the subtlety of a bulldozer at a flower show. Led the pack with his trademark physicality and rugby IQ.

Video Spacer

Best moments from the Investec Champions Cup | RPTV

The Boks Office crew discuss their best moments from the opening round of the Investec Champions Cup. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV now

Watch now

Video Spacer

Best moments from the Investec Champions Cup | RPTV

The Boks Office crew discuss their best moments from the opening round of the Investec Champions Cup. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV now

Watch now

3. Marco Riccioni – 6.5
Solidish at the scrum. A quietly effective performance from the Italian tighthead.

Fixture
Investec Champions Cup
Stade Francais
17 - 28
Full-time
Saracens
All Stats and Data

4. Maro Itoje – 7
A thorn in Stade’s side at the breakdown and reliable in the lineout. Was certainly a nuisance although, with three penalties to his name, he may have pushed the envelope a little too much.

5. Nick Isiekwe – 7
Put in a tireless shift, working hard in the tight exchanges and carrying with intent. Combined well with Itoje to dominate the lineout.

6. Theo McFarland – 8
Leapt like a salmon and carried like a runaway train. Stade must have felt like they were tackling a moving house every time he got the ball.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Ben Earl – 5.5
Sloppy. Tackled like a starving wolf but five turnovers conceded overshadowed his efforts. Unlucky to have a try ruled out but this was a little unrefined from the England ace.

8. Tom Willis – 8.5
A beast of a performance from Willis. The big No.8 made a crucial early tap tackle to stop a Stade break and carried relentlessly, racking up an impressive 57 metres. Played like a man who had mistaken Stade Jean Bouin for his personal playground.

9. Ivan van Zyl – 6.5
Provided quick service and took a heavy hit that led to Macalou’s red card. Kept the tempo high, ensuring Sarries took full advantage of their extra man.

10. Fergus Burke – 8
The architect of Saracens’ victory. Kicked brilliantly from the tee and controlled the game with poise. The Kiwi’s calmness under pressure was impressive.

ADVERTISEMENT

11. Rotimi Segun – 7.5
Superb in the air and constantly harassed Stade’s backfield. Won key moments, including drawing the yellow card that led to Saracens’ second-half dominance.

12. Nick Tompkins – 7
A livewire in midfield, constantly testing Stade’s defence with his competent carries and dynamic running lines. Inches away from scoring a try after stretching for the line.

13. Lucio Cinti – 6.5
Didn’t have too many opportunities with ball in hand but was solid defensively, keeping Stade’s midfield threats under wraps.

14. Liam Williams – 8.5
Marked his return to Saracens with a brilliant try, finishing Daly’s superb pass with a touch of class. Threatened constantly on the wing and was unlucky to have an earlier effort ruled out.

15. Elliot Daly – 7.5
Recovered well from an early charged-down kick to play a key role in Saracens’ attacking moments. His pinpoint left-handed pass set up Williams’ try, and he was dependable in the backfield.

REPLACEMENTS:

16. Theo Dan – 8
Made a significant impact off the bench, scoring the final try to seal the game.

17. Phil Brantingham – 6.5
Held his own in the scrum and worked hard in the loose.

18. Alec Clarey – 6.5
Made his presence felt with a few key tackles and solid scrummaging late on.

19. Harry Wilson – NA

20. Juan Martin Gonzalez – 7
Brought energy to the breakdown and helped Saracens maintain a physical edge.

21. Gareth Simpson – 6.5
Provided reliable service off the bench to close out the game.

22. Tiff Eden – NA.

23. Olly Hartley – 5
Didn’t have much time to make an impact but held his own in defence.

Related


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Razor's conservatism is in danger of halting New Zealand's progress'

Haha yeah I know, sorry I just cbf doing anything other than sprouting the garbage that comes in. You either follow the train of thought or don't most the time, that's why I like you, happy to not take it serious like, and reply regardless.

Haha more imaginary rational. You mean in 2018 and 19 he used 36 new players?

more = you're following in Saders footsteps (here I go again assuming you know what I'll mean haha)

imaginary = fictitious world cups (no WC in 2018)

by "months before" you mean 2018/19? = because you wrote 2018 i'm assuming that's because your brain was thinking about that year when he used most of those 36 players

36 new players = because it's absolutely impossible to use 36 new players in the handful of games you get, or "months", before a WC

Doesn't really sound like good coaching and reinforces other theories. Wouldn't spread that.

Doesn't really sound like good coaching = that is waay to many players no matter what way you spin it, or what period. Where did you even get the data for that from?

reinforces other theories = no need to go into them here but it definitely suggests a case of being lucky to win despite the fact (if true) imo

Wouldn't spread that = cheekyness about above point


So yeah, you can see why I don't try to elaberate my posts so everyone can understand and sadly theyre too succinct for some with a slightly different lingo or thought.

and two years of >85% win ratio on the trot - I’d love to see how he’d have down with better coaching.

the none TLDR version reply..

two years = but weren't you following the similar line of this article that Razor needs to open it up? Why would you think that when you're suggesting he's got another 3 or 4 years before he reaches that point in tenure when he should also be trying to hit the 85 mark?

>85% win ratio on the trot = WC years are short and provide easy opposition, you don't normally include them. 22 would be more relevant, and this year you had both other top teams at home, so you'd think that 85 number is overs, or 'above' average based on circumstances (85 is a really fabulous number however so going back to 80 would also still be great)

love to see how he’d have done with better coaching. = well it's exactly the opposite of above isn't it, it's operating at well over 70 for 4 (excl covid) of those 7 years instead of his 60%, before hitting the 80s mark.


You might also ask well how could that be possible when he's done so bloody well just to do what he's done? Well I'm not going to take him (or SA) down a beg or two, instead I'll give you the hint (because I'm over thinking how to type long versions of replys), the answer is in this article!


Can you think of any specific players that became instrumental to the team from those 36 new players? One's plucked out of nowhere so to speak? I know for the first two years after covid he switched up you're team and tactics after each game against NZ (for the second), I think winning both 1st games and losing both rematch's? You don't think he should ever have done that differently, not been so happy to give up a victory against the ABs?

262 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’
Search