Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Saracens give update on the Owen Farrell 'tackle school' progress

(Photo by David Rogers/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Saracens are waiting to hear whether England skipper Owen Farrell has successfully come through tackle school after he undertook the World Rugby coaching intervention programme. Banned last Wednesday for four matches at a disciplinary hearing following his cited shoulder-to-head collision the previous weekend with Gloucester’s Jack Clement, Farrell was given the option to have the last game of that suspension scratched provided he attend tackle school.

ADVERTISEMENT

The successful completion of this intervention programme would ensure that the Farrell ban will expire following Saracens’ January 28 league match at home to Bristol and clear him to lead England in the following weekend’s Guinness Six Nations opener versus Scotland at Twickenham.

It was July 201 when World Rugby first introduced the tackle school concept allowing suspended tacklers the opportunity to polish their technique and get the benefit of a week off their punishment.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

That school this past week involved Saracens recording footage of Farrell completing training ground drills to improve his tackle technique. There would also have been discussions with him about tackling and the intervention was filmed and passed onto World Rugby for review.

“He is in the process of doing it. I think it is sent off,” reported Saracens head coach Joe Shaw when asked on Wednesday by RugbyPass how far along was Farrell towards successfully completing the coaching intervention programme he needs to pass in order to be available to lead England at the start of the Six Nations.

Related

“I think you heard Kevin Sinfield in what he was talking about in the press the other day, it’s no different (at Saracens when it comes to tackling). We’re at it every single day with people trying to get better at tackling, trying to get better at passing, trying to get better at kicking so that is where we are.

“Owen is no different to anybody else, he will be at it and trying to get better and games that he has played and performances that he has put in and tackles that he has made, that speaks volumes. He will be at it again trying to improve his tackle technique, his kicking, his passing and everything else that makes Owen Farrell Owen Farrell.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The man to get in here is Adam Powell. Adam Powell is obsessed with it, our defence coach. I concentrate on the passing and the attack, I let Adam deal with the process and the tackle, he is your man to talk to,” continued Shaw, who confirmed that Saracens were currently awaiting the necessary feedback from the tackle school assessors regarding Farrell. “Yeah, we are (waiting).”

There had been criticism that the coaching intervention programme was a box-ticking exercise that allowed banned players to simply shave a week off their enforced time on the sidelines. However, after conducting a stocktake of the tackle school measure, World Rugby revealed in late November 2022 that just eight of the 120 players who had graduated from tackle school had reoffended since their ban.

It said at the time that this behavioural change would now result in the pilot programme becoming a permanent measure to encourage bad tackle offenders to improve their technique.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
F
Flankly 703 days ago

This one is really hard to understand, and definitely needs several sessions at a "tackle school".

Law 9.16: "A player must not charge or knock down an opponent carrying the ball without attempting to grasp that player."

I am reminded of how Jonny Wilkinson spent 32 hours per day practicing kicks. I can imagine Farrell needing that kind of intense repetition to get the intricacies of "attempting to grasp the player" fully comprehended.

P
Poe 703 days ago

Comedy gold

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search