Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Schalk Burger pinpoints the 'underrated' part of Ireland's game

Ireland/ PA

Former South Africa flanker Schalk Burger has highlighted the basis of Ireland’s comprehensive 38-17 win over France in the opening round of the Guinness Six Nations as their physicality, which he described as an “underrated” part of their game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Andy Farrell’s side rewrote the record books with their win in Marseille, registering their biggest-ever win over Les Bleus, with the 2007 World Cup winner saying they “physically bullied” the hosts.

Burger, who was no stranger to physicality on the rugby field himself, said on RugbyPass TV’s Boks Office recently that France are the one team that can match the Springboks in terms of physicality, but were made to look “lethargic”.

Video Spacer

Ireland Fans React to Record-Breaking Win Over France in the Six Nations 2024

Both Irish and French Fans react to Ireland beating France in Marseille in the opening round of the Six Nations 2024.

Video Spacer

Ireland Fans React to Record-Breaking Win Over France in the Six Nations 2024

Both Irish and French Fans react to Ireland beating France in Marseille in the opening round of the Six Nations 2024.

Physicality was not always the key feature of Ireland’s game until recently, but with the addition of player of the match Joe McCarthy, Burger, as well as Jean de Villiers and Hanyani Shimange, believes Ireland have a bright future.

De Villiers joked that this physicality is the South African influence of Jacques Nienaber, who became a Leinster coach after the World Cup, but this has been building for years.

Match Summary

1
Penalty Goals
1
2
Tries
5
2
Conversions
5
0
Drop Goals
0
93
Carries
113
5
Line Breaks
6
13
Turnovers Lost
7
2
Turnovers Won
4

“I think it’s often an underrated part of the Irish game when you think how physical their pack can be,” the 2004 World Rugby player of the year said.

“The French almost looked lethargic in their defence. If you think about the games we played against them, obviously they know what the Boks bring and how physical we are, they are the one team that could potentially match us. If you think about that quarter-final, they were absolutely outstanding.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think they quite had the same bite on Friday night.

“Their [France’s] biggest issue is that they were bossed around in the physicality. They got physically bullied at the weekend. They couldn’t stop the Irish maul.

“Yes, they had lost Paul Willemse and we know four locks have quite a big role to play in how effectively they could set those mauls. Willemse’s a big unit, he’s quite disruptive in that area.

“But the physicality was outstanding from Ireland, so I think that’s the basis of where the big victory came from.”

When questioned whether Ireland are on course for back-to-back Grand Slams, Burger said he felt England have one big performance in them, and that may well come in round four against the Irish at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ireland host Italy this Sunday at the Aviva Stadium, while France travel to Edinburgh the day before to face Scotland at Murrayfield.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
T
Terry24 318 days ago

Ireland are good enough to impose the type of phisical game that suites them: a mix between mobility and power. France were not able to impose a power only game against Ireland. A key to this was Ireland winning the kicking exchanges forcing either France to lose ground or keep the ball in play, tiring their very powerful but aerobically weak pack. Ireland forward’s also used quick ball and footwork to attacked spaces between defenders. The quick ball was secured by really excellent ruck work. France literally could not impose themselves physically on Ireland and even when they had possession Ireland really pressured Lucu behind the French ruck.

The first 30 mins were outstanding from Ireland and should have put them out of sight. Van Der Flier was just short when France were holding the ball in the ruck in what was a certain try and should have meant a yello and Irish penalty. The forward touch by a French hand to stop a certain try by Aki was also controversially as the player had absolutlely no possibility of doing anything but a forward knock by putting his hands out. The French TV director also played a blinder to get a penalty against Crowley when he clearly played the ball during a legitimate aerial battle with Fickou. This reversed field position from 10 metres from the French line to the Irish 22 and France scored a minute later (although this was the second half). I am not complaining just showing that Ireland’s performance particularly in first 30 could have resulted in 50+ on the scoreboard.

C
Chris 318 days ago

RSA boys saying it was all physicality is not newsworthy

It is hard to say anything else when your brain is pure muscle

c
craig 318 days ago

How many world cups you have pussy boy? Would rather have a strong muscle brain than a soft and creamy man vagina.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search