Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Schalk Burger questions if 'balance of power' is shifting for Boks

South Africa's lock Franco Mostert (R) leaves the pitch after an injury during the second Rugby Union test match between South Africa and Ireland at Kings Park stadium in Durban on July 13, 2024. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP)

Former South Africa flanker Schalk Burger has questioned whether Springboks head coach Rassie Erasmus will stick with a 6-2 split on the bench for the Rugby Championship, claiming the “balance of power” within the squad is shifting from the forwards to the backs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Erasmus has been the paragon of pragmatism in recent seasons when selecting his bench, switching between a 5-3 and 6-2, and occasionally a 7-1, split depending on the Boks’ opposition.

While the 6-2 split has been frequently deployed by the world champions, allowing them to flaunt a welter of world-class options in the pack to outmuscle any opponent in the final quarter of a match, a deepening injury crisis among the forwards combined with some returning backs has led Burger to question whether Erasmus will reassess his options.

Video Spacer

Boks Office on the size of junior players these days | RPTV

Boks Office is back and this week they have Springbok Evan Roos on the couch. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Coming soon

Video Spacer

Boks Office on the size of junior players these days | RPTV

Boks Office is back and this week they have Springbok Evan Roos on the couch. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Coming soon

Speaking on RugbyPass TV’s latest episode of Boks Office to be released this week, the 2007 World Cup winner looked at lock Salmaan Moerat’s limited game time against Ireland in the second Test of their 1-1 series as an indication that the ‘Bomb Squad’ might not be as potent as it has been in recent years.

With locks Jean Kleyn, Lood de Jager and Franco Mostert all out, and with backs Damian Willemse and Canan Moodie nearing returns, Burger wonders whether the Boks will soon be better suited having an extra back on the bench to change a game rather than a forward.

Fixture
Rugby Championship
Australia
7 - 33
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

“I think the balance of the 6-2 split, is it something we’re still going to chase?” he said.

“You look at the Irish game, I think Salmaan Moerat only got a couple of minutes in that one. They didn’t use him at all, they didn’t empty the bench.

“The whole premise of the 6-2 split is that you’ve got the best two packs of forwards, you’ve got to use them early.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Obviously, having locks injured puts pressure on our squad, but also gives opportunity for development. There’s Ben-Jason Dixon, a guy like Ruan Venter, and how they’re going to be utilised.

“The main question is who is your first pick at No.10. At the moment it’s still Handre [Pollard], but you see a guy like Sacha [Feinberg-Mngomezulu] that wants to play at fly-half, he’s filling the utility role.

“Once a guy like Damian Willemse comes back, Canan Moodie, will we then go to a 5-3 split? Because then the balance of power shifts to the backs more than the fowards.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
D
DS 144 days ago

The current winning style of heavy contact, constant attritive gameplans favors SA with their assembly line of huge bodies. Teams, like the Blues in the Super final, have been winning tournaments playing heavy contact, one off the ruck.
For some, this style of rugby is mind-numbingly boring but more important is the impact this continuous contact has on short term injuries and especially long term health issues. Player's welfare just seems collateral damage.

S
SF 144 days ago

Something to think about. The utility value of SFM, GW and DW will allow Rassie to pick a 6-2 bench though. But I also think that SFM must be blooded as a longterm flyhalf. Keep Pollard around to finish tight matches. I have always been for getting the youngsters in now. Give them 3 years to settle in and let the play the AB's, France etc… WLR, HP and Faf is getting on.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search