Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Schmidt gets unexpected Six Nations injury boost with early return of Irish forward

Ireland players sing the national anthem (Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

Ireland’s Six Nations title defence has received a major mid-campaign boost with the return to club action on Friday night of Ulster’s Iain Henderson.

ADVERTISEMENT

Joe Schmidt was forced to start the unheralded Quinn Roux in last Saturday’s round two win over Scotland.

The South African had failed to make the cut in January 16 when Schmidt announced a 38-strong squad for the tournament that included five locks.

However, Champions Cup injuries to Henderson and Tadhg Beirne, along with Devin Toner’s need for ankle surgery following the opening round loss to England, catapulted Roux into the frame for a first ever Six Nations start at the age of 28.

Roux wasn’t found wanting in helping Ireland see off the Scots in a low-frills encounter at Murrayfield, but the potential return of the higher quality Henderson in time for Ireland’s trip to face Italy on February 24 will be seen as a hugely encouraging development for Schmidt.

Henderson, the 2017 British & Irish Lion, had missed the start of the 2019 Six Nations due to a finger injury sustained during Ulster’s narrow win at Leicester which secured his team qualification for the Champions Cup quarter-finals for the first time since 2014.

The second row had only just returned from winter thumb surgery when he sustained his latest injury. However, his reputation as a quick healer has again proven to be true with his inclusion by Dan McFarland in the Ulster side to to take on Ospreys at Bridgend in Friday night.

ADVERTISEMENT

Henderson started three of Ireland’s matches last term en route a rare Grand Slam success and with Toner now sidelined for the remainder of the latest Six Nations, the soon-to-be 27-year-old now had the opportunity to slot back in alongside James Ryan provided he comes through his PRO14 comeback in Wales unscathed.

John Cooney, capped off the bench on recent weeks as sub for Conor Murray, will also start for Ulster at scrum-half.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Wallabies have a serious problem The Wallabies have a serious problem
Search