Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Schmidt won't panic after Wallabies' Santa Fe smashing

Joaquín Oviedo of Argentina scores a try during The Rugby Championship 2024 match between Argentina and Australia at Brigadier General Estanislao Lopez Stadium on September 7, 2024 in Santa Fe, Argentina. (Photo by Luciano Bisbal/Getty Images)

Joe Schmidt reckons there won’t be knee-jerk reactions ahead of the Wallabies’ date with New Zealand after they “fell off a cliff” in a historic 67-27 Argentina mauling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fresh off a 20-19 win in pouring rain against Los Pumas a week ago, Australia led 20-3 after 30 minutes in brilliant Santa Fe sunshine on Sunday (AEST).

The hosts then rattled off nine tries to one in the next 50 minutes, including four in the last nine minutes, to rack up the biggest score of any Test nation against the Wallabies.

A try in the final minute eclipsed the 61-22 hammering against South Africa in 1997, with the Wallabies now last on The Rugby Championship ladder with one win and no bonus points from four games.

The 40-point margin was their second-largest loss, behind only a 53-8 Johannesburg drubbing in 2008.

They’ll return home for a Bledisloe Cup battle with an All Blacks outfit who are also 1-3 in the TRC, that begins with a Sydney Test on September 21.

“We probably put three reasonable halves together, then fell off a bit of a cliff,” disappointed coach Schmidt said of their two-Test tour.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We over-reached at the back end (in Santa Fe) and it didn’t look good.”

Schmidt said he’d take a typically “pragmatic” approach to the flogging, pointing out the youth of a side that’s featured a record 16 debutants this year and their positive patches of play.

Related

“I’m not going to bury the squad on the basis of that one half,” he said.

“It’s really the way the team respond now; they’re proud young men … it’ll be a sombre flight home

“A bit of a breather and try to hit the ground running … try to steel ourselves for what’s coming.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Australia looked on song when five-eighth Ben Donaldson, in for the injured Noah Lolesio (back), found joy down the blindside to set up fullback Andrew Kellaway for their second try and create a 17-point buffer.

Back-rower Carlo Tizzano had earlier barged over for the game’s first try after a Los Pumas’ penalty goal.

The tactical exits of props Angus Bell and Taniela Tupou before halftime seemed to shift the contest, with the hosts flicking the switch after 30 minutes with tries to Mateo Carreras and 100-Test skipper Julian Montoya exposing an increasingly ragged Wallabies defence.

Unforced errors to begin the second half gave Argentina the platform to edge ahead and then speed clear, with seven more tries only offset by replacement halfback Tate McDermott’s probing tap-and-go that reduced the margin to 14.

But Argentina emphatically shut the door in a devastating final 10 minutes, as James Slipper’s record-equalling 139th Wallabies Test didn’t go to script.

Los Pumas (2-2) began the TRC with a 38-30 defeat of New Zealand in Auckland, the most points the All Blacks have conceded in a home Test.

“Records are going to happen,” Schmidt said.

“That’s what they’re capable of. They can score quickly and as soon as you’re not making the first tackle and scrambling … it’s very hard to plug the holes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
J
JK 103 days ago

Yes, don't panic unless they score 70 or more points on you...

T
Terry24 104 days ago

My own feeling is that Australia put in a monumental effort to beat Argentina the previous week. They started brightly but the Pumas ground them down and let loose. In modern high level international rugby if one team is fatigued and off the pace another team can hurt them big time although the hirt inflicted by Argentina was exceptional. Both great Argentian play and off the boil Australian play leading to that 67 points.

O
OJohn 104 days ago

In no universe is that performance acceptable for a Wallaby coach. None whatsoever.

Well maybe one occupied by kiwis, Welshman, Scots and south Africans who have a vindictive evil death wish for Australian rugby.

B
Bob Salad II 104 days ago

Argentina seem to be clocking up good wins with increasing regularity, so while Australia’s decline is very disappointing for world rugby, Argentina appear well placed to plug the gap.

O
OJohn 104 days ago

He's getting paid a million dollars a year to sabotage the Wallabies from NZ.

Why would he panic ?

B
Bull Shark 104 days ago

A million? That seems a lot for such an easy job.

C
Carlos 104 days ago

Of course, and why deny the possibility that the Pumas played better and adjusted well after being behind 20-3. Or that Felipe finally started a real fly half and used Carreras in his natural position.


Or that Tupou did nothing about an average scrummaging prop like Gallo. Who is very good in the loose.


Or that tackling is a heart issue….

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search