Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland call up replacement in wake of Hogg bombshell

(Photo by Simon Galloway/PA Images via Getty Images)

Scotland have called up two replacements just hours after it was revealed that Stuart Hogg would take no part in the Rugby World Cup in France later this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hogg had previously revealed plans to end his career after the World Cup in France later this year.

But the 31-year-old has decided to call time “knowing that I have given my body and heart to rugby”.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Hogg tweeted: “It is difficult where to start, but with great sadness and an enormous amount of pride I am announcing my immediate retirement from playing rugby.

“I fought with everything I had to make the Rugby World Cup, but this time my body has not been able to do the things I wanted and needed it to do.

“We knew this day would come eventually. I just never thought it would be this soon.

“It’s hard to put into words just how much of an impact the game has had on my life. I will be retiring knowing that I have given my body and heart to rugby.

“I will be forever grateful to this amazing community and cannot wait to begin my journey as a proud supporter of Scottish Rugby”.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Scottish Rugby statement reads: “The Scotland team will continue their preparations for the Rugby World Cup tomorrow in St Andrews for a three-day training camp with Bath Rugby duo Ruaridh McConnochie and Josh Bayliss joining the group.

“Bayliss replaces Andy Christie who is unable to train currently following an arm injury and will remain at his club to undergo rehabilitation. McConnochie steps in for the retired Stuart Hogg.

“Adam Hastings continues his recovery from his leg injury sustained in the World XV v Barbarians match at the end of the season and will remain in the squad, meeting up with the team in St Andrews.”

additional reporting PA

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
p
pauline 506 days ago

Great double call up for Bath!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 26 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

SA will drop? Not according to the quality of output in the last few years. Any South African will tell you that they feel more confident in the level of SA rugby than they have in years. The Springboks immediately improved when Rassie championed a global outlook on the game and the structures. Players are proud of their ability to pull contracts overseas. They are also proud to play at home. Are SA teams dominating the URC? Not exactly. Are they playing well? Absolutely. Is the national team having its greatest era ever? Undoubtedly. Will this last no? Hell no. Is that the fault of opening the selection policy? Of course not. Teams ebb and flow, there will always be winner and losers somewhere. The global standard of rugby has raised enormously. We all know ABs fans expect to be the best there ever was for all and eternity; and undoubtedly NZ will always be sitting at the high table due to rugby culture and exceptional athletes, but to suggest that allowing overseas players into the national team will automatically decrease domestic strength has no basis in reality.


But of course, this isn't my team and it's not my problem. There will always be people on either side of the fence, I just believe that closing off a national team just because a players seeks a salary elsewhere is indicative of a very limited mindset. All I hope for is for the ABs to continue being a force on the field, regardless of who plays in the jersey, so that the Springboks can continue being pushed everytime they meet each other on the field.

90 Go to comments
M
M.W.Keith 39 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Something being relevant just because someone wants to make it relevant is a bit of a logical fallacy there. Similarly, I also said that these traditional aspects of rugby need to change - rather than it being what makes the sport beautiful. It's a beautiful sport because of the long-standing rivalries and the way the game is played. However, if rugby wants to become a global sport then some old ways are going to have to update themselves for the sake of service to the sport. This is the entire point of my comment, which perhaps you missed? I really don't think that embracing the global game will turn rugby into football, let's be honest. Test is the pinnacle of rugby, unlike football where club reigns supreme. This is a culture that won't change.


You speak of four of the top five nations having closed border policies. Well, Ireland is really just Leinster and a handful of other players. Irish rugby is coming up well, but let's not pretend there is parity between clubs. If you want to eb in the national team, your best chance is to get into Dublin let alone stay in the country. England rugby? They have often been said to have one of the deepest pools and pockets in the game, so they have the potential to be healthy regardless. If they can sort out their identity anyway. But thene again, are they so healthy? Clubs closing down, extraordinary players in the prime leaving (Ribbans, Arundell et al.), it's not a great look over there. France? France is a whole different kettle of fish - no other nation in the world can claim to have such strong multi-league club rugby, so even there they have an enormous feeder culture. Besides, loads of players want to move to France for the money so it's a moot point even thinking of reasons why French players would want to leave their home country. The money is at home.


Your comment on whether or not it is worth it, considering the length of the season. This is a very fair question, one in which SA is going to have to learn the answer to over the coming seasons. But there are two points to consider here: 1) can this not create a situation whereby increased depth and rotation for player health and safety allows for more players to get game time? If Rassie can rotate 50+ players in a season and maintain a great record, then it can be done. Naturally, clubs won't have the same resources at hand but nevertheless there is a solution to be found rather than restricting the top level of the game to a smaller number of players. If rugby wants to expand its reach, it is going to have to expand its structures in order to do so. The second point is that this exact question strengthens the call for a global calendar. Get NH and SH national and club teams aligned.


However, I do think that you have missed my point. Basically, why should a player be excluded from selection just because they earn money elsewhere? Yes, it's a difficult scenario. Yes, there will have to be workarounds. But to say that "it is simpler and easier to manage" is a lazy excuse. This handling of the Mounga situation is a total farce, because there is no clear vision here. Certain players are given sabbaticals, or they sign short term contracts with foreign teams knowing that by and large their national jersey is nailed down. Why not just let them play overseas, if their jersey is so nailed down? There is no easy answer to the problems we all know that global rugby is running headlong into, but right now there seem to be a lot of cooks with a lot of their own priorities in the kitchen and something is going to have to give.

90 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Seven Springboks make World Rugby men’s 15s dream team of the year Seven Springboks make World Rugby men’s 15s dream team of the year
Search