Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland hail 'special' Hogg, outline frustration over Gilchrist

By PA
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Scotland defence coach Steve Tandy paid tribute to special player Stuart Hogg as the Exeter full-back gets ready to win his 100th cap. Hogg – who captained his country before being replaced in the role by Jamie Ritchie last year – is in line to hit the century landmark in Sunday’s high-stakes Six Nations showdown with Ireland at BT Murrayfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tandy believes the 30-year-old’s longevity at international level is testament to his pride in playing for Scotland. “In this day and age, with the amount of rugby these boys play, to have the motivation and energy he has to represent Scotland, he is a special player and a special human being,” said Tandy about Hogg.

“The pride he has for representing Scotland is brilliant to see. It will be a huge achievement for him and well deserved. He is bringing bags of energy with the way he plays and there is an excitement around him.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I know people talk about Stuart in attack and things, but the energy he brings in defence, the communication, the focus, it is brilliant to have him part of this group.”

Scotland know a win over in-form Ireland will secure the Triple Crown and keep them in the hunt for the Six Nations title. Tandy feels there is plenty to be optimistic about. “They are the number one team in the world for a reason but we need to look at what we can bring to the game,” he said.

Related

“We have played really well in the first three games. We have shown lots of really positive attributes to our game. The boys are in a confident space and we are excited to be at Murrayfield in front of a full house playing for a Triple Crown.”

Grant Gilchrist will play no part in the last two matches against Ireland and Italy after the lock learned on Monday he would face a three-week ban for the foul that led to his red card against France.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland were disappointed at the length of time it took to reach a decision, meaning Edinburgh’s URC match against Leinster last weekend – of which Gilchrist played no part – was not factored into his suspension. “We are a little frustrated and disappointed with the length of time it took and when the match ban started from,” said Tandy. “The actual hearing itself was great.

“I was on it myself and I thought it was handled really positively but there was a little bit of frustration over the length of time it took to get to the point of what games he would be missing.”

Tandy reported that everyone currently in the squad is fit and available for Sunday and is confident they have enough high calibre options to cope without the influential Gilchrist. “In the second row, our squad depth has grown over the last few years to be really competitive,” he said.

“We have got Scott Cummings back, we have got Jonny Gray, who came on against France and played really well, and Sam Skinner’s playing really well so we have got plenty depth there.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search