Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland must move on quickly from South Africa loss - Stuart McInally

By PA
Stuart McInally (Photo by Ian MacNicol/Getty Images)

Scotland hooker Stuart McInally will get the taste of defeat out of his mouth by “sinking his teeth” into Japan.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gregor Townsend’s men suffered their first loss of the Autumn Nations Series when they went down 30-15 to South Africa on Saturday.

But McInally stressed the reaction to the setback would be the same as the way they got down to business after their impressive win over Australia the previous weekend.

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi

The Edinburgh player said: “You get over a defeat just by sinking your teeth into the next opponents.

“I remember someone asking me last week, maybe on the Monday or Tuesday, ‘you must still be buzzing from the Australia victory?’ But, win or lose, you quickly get over it and learn your lessons and you have to just focus on the next game.

“We enjoyed the Australia win that night but the next day we were straight into prepping for South Africa. And it will be the same for this. We will do our reviews and learn the lessons we need to but then our focus will turn very quickly to Japan.

“There will be lots of positives we can take from the game but lots of lessons as well.”

McInally felt Scotland’s game plan of moving the ball quickly and trying to stretch the world champions worked well at times, notably for Stuart Hogg’s two tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

And he rejected suggestions that the best way to deal with their physicality was to play them at their own game.

“I don’t think that’s the way to play them,” he said. “You have to match their physicality and we believe we are a physical team and we showed that in large parts of our defence. A lot of their points came from penalty kicks not from barreling us and gaining momentum that way. I was really proud of our defensive effort.

“But if you look at the way we scored our tries, it was through moving the ball.

“That was part of our plan and it was good to see us pick off a few tries. We just needed to take a few more of those opportunities as well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks notched two tries as well and it was the penalty count that cost Scotland with the tourists kicking themselves out of sight in the final quarter.

McInally admitted there were some lessons to learn from the set-piece.

“They have got an excellent lineout defence so you have got to give credit to them,” he said. “In that second half they really squeezed us and picked off a few lineouts.

“We came up against a really good scrum. They were powerful and well-coached. There were a few times we creaked a little but there were a few times I felt we got into good shape and rhythm and potentially didn’t get the rewards.

“You have got to give credit to them at set-piece. They are a set-piece team and they came and delivered on what they tried to deliver on.

“On the whole we could have done better at scrum time and solved a few issues but credit to them for the way they played.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

40 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job Stuart Lancaster 'wants out' of Racing 92 and eyeing Euro giants job
Search