Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland player ratings - versus France

Adam Hastings on Six Nations duty in Paris (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)

Scottish hopes of bagging a first win in Paris in 20 years were eclipsed in the Parisian spring sun as France’s team of individuals managed to finally find some sense of unity amid the chaos of their 2019 Six Nations campaign to secure a bonus point victory.

ADVERTISEMENT

Seventeen points was a frustrating margin for Scotland to lose by and Gregor Townsend will especially rue his team’s inability to fire a shot during the 10-minute first-half spell when they had man advantage with Yoann Huget in the bin.

Instead of eating into a 3-10 margin, Scotland were fortunate that a French try was ruled out and an easy penalty kick missed. Their challenge then fell away with the early second-half concession of a try from Huget.

A scoreless 33-minute spell followed but any hopes that the fresher legs of the Scottish bench would generate a comeback were outdone by the late two-try contribution of French sub Gregory Alldritt, his second arriving in the eighth added minute. Here’s how the Scotland players rated:

15. BLAIR KINGHORN – 4
Played as if his demotion to the bench against Ireland following a try hat-trick in the opener against Italy had dented his confidence. Didn’t provide the defensive security demanded of him in the absence of the injured Stuart Hogg. He was poorly positioned when Romain Ntamack pounced for the first French try and was far too easily stepped by Huget for the second.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

14. TOMMY SEYMOUR – 4
Far too anonymous. Rather than accept being isolated on his wing, he needed to offer himself more. Even when traffic did come his way his tackling was found wanting and with France in full flow, he missed too many and would surely have been replaced had the equally ineffective Sean Maitland on the other wing not gone off first.

13. NICK GRIGG – 6
What he gave in defence with some encouraging tackling he ruined in attack with too many turnovers in possession. Selected in place of the injured Huw Jones, Grigg was an nuggety operator who went in low and often to chop tackle more physical French ball-carriers. However, he suffered of the other side on the ball and was easy pickings. A 68th minute steal by Huget near the French 22 summed up his mixed afternoon.

ADVERTISEMENT

12. SAM JOHNSON – 6
One of Scotland’s more tidier operators, he only lasted 53 minutes. The few metres he made were hard-earned, but it was defence where was left exposed, finding himself powerless as the last man to prevent Ntamack from finishing off the first tr that set the tone for a difficult afternoon.

11. SEAN MAITLAND – 4
It was his early missed tackle on Thomas Ramos that ignited the show of French flair on a sunny, dry afternoon. He was intelligent enough to sniff out the danger that could have led to a Huget try on 16 minutes, but his failure to get off the ground against the aerial-fetching Damian Penaud eight minutes after the break illustrated how the Maitland that plays for Scotland doesn’t carry the same certainty when he plays with Saracens in the Premiership.

10. PETER HORNE – 6
Was gutsy in a role when was stepping in for the unavailable Finn Russell, but his game was too loose on a day when the Scots needed reliability. He was the second player too easily stepped after Maitland on Ramos’ tone-setting early run. He selflessly put his body on the line, though. One hit from Guilhem Guirado was bone-shaking. He stuck at it and was rewarded with the consolation of his break being the catalyst for his side’s late – and only – try.

Pete Horne of Scotland is challenged by Louis Picamoles and Mathieu Bastareaud of France (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)
ADVERTISEMENT

9. GREIG LAIDLAW – 5
He earns big bucks as a high profile addition to the all-swaggering Clermont team but his laboured distribution from the Scotland ruck continued on from way it was in the loss to Ireland. His passing away from the breakdown was far too pedestrian and it allowed the French defence to get set time and time again. The higher tempo Ali Price could be the future key to quicken the pace of the Scottish attack, but that would spark a debate about the captaincy. Laidlaw’s afternoon was encapsulated by his seemingly straightforward penalty kick hitting an upright.

1. ALLAN DELL – 4
Started encouragingly enough with a meaty rip of French possession in the tackle. However, he couldn’t deliver on his set-piece bread and butter. Two penalised scrum collapses were a huge black mark in a contest when set-piece security was an imperative.

2. STUART McINALLY – 5
Was busy in other aspects of the match but, just like Dell, he needed his basics to go very well and they didn’t. His first lineout throw was stolen. That didn’t cause too much damage as the steal took place on the Scots 10 metre-line. However, his failure to find Magnus Bradbury with a throw just minutes before the break after a penalty was kicked deep into the French 22 was infuriating.

3. SIMON BERGHAN – 4
Difficult day with the Scottish pack under the pump against a physical French unit looking to erase the bad memories of their opening two matches. He got away without being penalised for some early crossing when Scotland carried, but he rarely featured in or around the ball after that.

4. GRANT GILCHRIST – 5
Was the quieter of the two starting second rows even though he played the full 80. Was at fault at the first Scotland throw when Scotland needed a more composed start. Dug in after that but a penalty for coming in at the side on 44 minutes illustrated how difficult it was to get in amongst the French forwards and be a nuisance.

5. JONNY GRAY – 5
Did some selfless work and managed to put in a whole heap of tackles before he disappeared on 56 minutes. The problem with Gray is that he is always an immense asset to have when his team doesn’t have the ball, but the question has to be asked does he offer enough when he team are looking to create?

6. MAGNUS BRADBURY – 5
Chosen in place of injured Ryan Wilson, he finished as his team’s top tackler. That commitment was excellent but, as was the case with a number of his colleagues, it’s what he didn’t do on the other side of the ball that contributed to his team’s defeat. A failed lineout take just before the break – he was beaten in the air by Wenceslas Lauret – was costly.

7. JAMES RITCHIE – 6
Another regular tackler, but he didn’t have all that much luck when trying to poach ball on the floor of the French breakdown. His struggle to gain ground on his carries was an indicator of how tough it was for the Scots to get momentum. Caught on his own line late on, he conceded the scrum-five that prompted the third French try.

8. JOSH STRAUSS – 4
Was at the heart of a loss passport carry-on in midweek and he will wonder if he would have been better off if a replacement wasn’t fast-tracked. Going off his feet at a ruck cost his team a potential 29th minute try and he will recoil in horror when he reviews France’s second try. The sight of Mathieu Bastareaud putting a kick over his head and having the acceleration to run around and catch looked awful.

REPLACEMENTS

22. ADAM HASTINGS – 6
Arrived into the action on 44 minutes and quickly got a taste, intercepting a French pass to spoil one attack and then making a soccer goal-keeping style save to block a kick through. Also made an excellent line break on 68 minutes.

16. FRASER BROWN (for McInally, 64), 17. ALEX ALLAN (for Dell, 75), 18. ZANDER FAGERSON (for Berghan, 64), 19. BEN TOOLIS (for Gray, 56), 20. GARY GRAHAM (for Strauss, 64), 21. ALI PRICE (for Laidlaw, 64), 23. D’ARCY GRAHAM (for Maitland, 64) – all 4
Scotland make an exciting fuss about the calibre of its bench but even a six-man substitution on 64 minutes, at a time when France had only made one change, couldn’t alter the way the game was going. Price did score a try, but Allan left his scrum down for France’s third.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 41 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search