Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland player ratings vs Argentina | 1st Test July 2022

Argentinas Guido Petti (R) is tackled by Scontland's Grant Gilchrist during the rugby union international test match bewteen Argentina and Scotland at 23 de Agosto Stadium in San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy, Argentina on July 2, 2022. (Photo by Pablo GASPARINI / AFP) (Photo by PABLO GASPARINI/AFP via Getty Images)

Scotland’s recent good run of form against Argentina came to a shuddering halt in Jujuy as the Pumas squeezed the tourists out of the first Test.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first half resembled attack vs defence with Scotland unable to get their hands on the ball, and although they hit back after the break, the tourists fell away late on.

There will be concerns for Gregor Townsend over the set-piece, which faltered badly, and there are again more questions than answers as to how Scotland build depth in key areas.

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones faces the press after England’s latest loss:

Video Spacer

Eddie Jones faces the press after England’s latest loss:

Here’s how the Scotland players rated on a difficult afternoon.

15. Rory Hutchinson – 5
Dealt with a high ball well to settle any nerves on his international return and first start at fullback. A lovely touch to give Kinghorn room as Bennett scored, before taking his third Test try well.

14. Darcy Graham – 5
No real opportunities with ball in hand but industrious kick chasing important to Scotland. Handed Argentina a counter attacking chance with a loose kick just before half-time. Also conceded a sloppy penalty early on.

13. Mark Bennett – 5
A really quiet first half in which a big hit was the most noteworthy contribution. However after the interval, the Edinburgh man got his hands on the ball and scored on his first Test start since 2016. Strong in contact when he got a chance to have a go.

12. Sam Johnson – 6
A couple of hefty carries into traffic to get Scotland front foot ball with their very limited attacking chances.

ADVERTISEMENT

11. Duhan van der Merwe – 6
Unable to get into the game in an attacking sense but made two vital tackles. Almost scored after a stray lineout.

10. Blair Kinghorn – 4
A real mixed bag with some good touches for Scotland’s tries but overplays too often at Test level. Still early days in his transition to fly-half at the top level, but Scotland missed Finn Russell and even the control of Adam Hastings.

9. Ali Price – 5
A chance to step up with Scotland missing Russell and Hogg, but made some strange decisions considering visitors’ limited chances to attack. Kicked away turnover ball and tapped a kickable penalty.

1. Pierre Schoeman – 6
Early difficulties at the scrum, but showed his huge engine with a great kick chase and tackle that earned Scotland three points.

ADVERTISEMENT

2. George Turner – 5
Some really costly errors at the lineout, including one right at the start of the second half. One big carry through the midfield his only other notable act in the opening 40.

3. Zander Fagerson – 5
Dominated at the scrum barring one early decision. Piled into a ruck that was lost and left Scotland numbers down from which de la Fuente scored.

4. Grant Gilchrist – 5
The captain was predictably strong in the tight and works tirelessly but will be disappointed with a couple of wayward lineouts.

Related

5. Jonny Gray – 4
Made a good carry that sucked in home defenders before Hutchinson scored, but otherwise kept really quiet.

6. Magnus Bradbury – 6
A couple of big tackles on Matera as Argentina threatened the Scottish line early on.

7. Luke Crosbie – 5
Captained Scotland ‘A’ last weekend and given a go with Watson injured and Darge only just returning from injury. Prominent with ball in hand early but picked off by Mallia for Carreras’ try.

8. Matt Fagerson – 6
Worked hard, won a couple of jackal penalties, but Scotland’s breakaway trio couldn’t get on top of the Pumas loose forwards.

Related

Replacements
16. Ewan Ashman – 4
Needs to do more if he’s to usurp Turner and get ahead of Brown and McInally in pecking order.

17. Rory Sutherland – 3
Back after missing the tail end of the Six Nations, but struggled at the scrum and no impact with ball in hand.

18. Javan Sebastian – 3
The Scarlets man wasn’t able to have the same impact as he did against Chile a week ago. Only notable contribution was to pile into a maul at the side.

19. Sam Skinner – 4
Replaced Gray inside the final 15 minutes, but the game had gone by then.

20. Rory Darge – 5
Just back from injury, the Glasgow man didn’t have the same impact as during the Six Nations but battled hard.

21. Ben White – 4
Sharp at the breakdown, but another who conceded a soft penalty.

22. Ross Thompson – N/A
Unused

23. Sione Tuipulotu – N/A
On for Johnson inside the final 10 minutes. No time to make an impact as the game petered out.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search