Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland's 6 foot 5 inch replacement for Stuart Hogg

Blair Kinghorn is a leading contender for the 15 shirt with Scotland this Autumn. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Blair Kinghorn is too modest to admit it and too wary of being labelled presumptuous to say more than a few reverential words about it, but behind his eyes, the Scotland full-back jersey must be looming like the pot of gold at the end of a rainbow.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’ve not thought too much about it,” he says, with a shake of the head that is anything but convincing.
“There are lots of talented back-three players here,” he adds.

“Anyone can slot into that 15 role,” he insists.

The truth is that while Gregor Townsend has a penchant for the unexpected, it would be a colossal shock if anyone but Kinghorn is the starting 15 in Cardiff in five days time.

There’s no Stuart Hogg, of course, the wonderful lynchpin of the Scottish backline recovering from ankle surgery. Ruaridh Jackson isn’t in the squad. Byron McGuigan and Sean Maitland are but as this first autumn Test falls outside the international window, their English clubs have no obligation to release them. Even were they available, Kinghorn would still be the overwhelming front-runner.

Tommy Seymour is in the hunt too, but even allowing for his fine showing in the role during Glasgow’s ruthless dismantling of Cardiff Blues, he doesn’t usurp Kinghorn. Dave Rennie, Seymour’s club coach, said as much last week. Seymour is an option for Townsend, but Kinghorn has the strongest case.

The gangling 21-year-old has a boat-load of qualities to admire. Last season, he came of age at Richard Cockerill’s Edinburgh, emerging as one of the most devastating strike-runners in the Pro14 at 6’5 and 95kg.

His ability to lope into the line from deep, gallop through holes and free a snaking arm for an off-load is precious. With that long frame and searing speed, he is an excellent finisher. He made more metres than any other player in the league last year, and was near the top of the charts for carries, defenders beaten, clean breaks and off-loads. He is up there in all those ranking tables again six rounds into the new season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kinghorn won his first cap off the bench in Scotland’s rousing Calcutta Cup triumph and scored a fine try against Ireland in his first start the following round, playing on the wing.

He toured the Americas in the summer, starting the perfunctory win over Canada at full-back, the bruising loss to the USA and the walloping Townsend’s troops dealt Argentina on either wing, touching down twice more. All in all, a brilliant break-out season.

“It’s definitely a pretty big jump up [from club to international rugby], although when you play the big games in the Champions Cup the physicality is right up there,” Kinghorn says.

“The difference I’ve found is the pace of international rugby being much quicker. Everyone is at the top of their game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s just about getting used to playing in front of that many people. At club level, you’re playing in front of 7-10,000, whereas at the Aviva Stadium and Murrayfield, it’s packed full.

“I was really nervous before my first cap, so it’s about getting in your own zone. One thing that sticks in my mind is sitting in the changing room beforehand and Greig Laidlaw coming over to say, ‘just do your thing’.”

Kinghorn’s game is mighty impressive, but if there is a chink in his armour, it is his one-on-one defence. The ease with which Benjamin Fall, Craig Gilroy and George North have waltzed through his arms over the past two months is enough to set alarm bells ringing.

Sure, these are world-class attackers we’re talking about, but if you want to be an international regular, you have to put world-class attackers on their backsides.

“I’m getting better; my form is getting closer to where it needs to be. In the first couple of games of the season, I was a bit off the pace, but the Edinburgh team are functioning really well at the minute and I’m just happy to be part of it,” Kinghorn says.

“Coming back in after two months away from rugby, your game sharpness does go a little bit and it takes a couple of games to get back into it.

“I feel like a big work-on at the moment is my defence and I’ve been working really hard with our defence coach, Calum MacRae.

“The main point I’ve been given is to work hard on all my little skills. At the start of last season, it was basic mistakes that were letting me down, letting the team down. Whether it was kicking, a couple of passes or my tackling. I’ve been working on my basic skills week in week out, so that under pressure I can perform.

“Mistakes are always part of the game. When you’re going with your instinct, sometimes you do make mistakes. That’s life, you’re human, everyone does that. It’s more about not making unforced errors. I’ve worked really hard at it, with all the coaches at Edinburgh, and also on my concentration throughout the whole week.”

Kinghorn didn’t play in Scotland’s Six Nations humiliation in Cardiff back in February, but he was there. As the 24th man, he took part in the warm-up, drinking in the sights and sounds of a Championship battle. He sat in the stand enveloped in his tracksuit, deafened by the joyous roars of Welsh revellers. He watched in horror as his team-mates were battered and bamboozled, the wave of hope they had ridden into the campaign utterly shredded in 80 brutal minutes.

Continue reading below…
Watch: Join RugbyPass employee of the month runner-up Sam Smith as he embarks on an epic journey across Europe to track down some of the finest Kiwi talent plying their trade in the Northern Hemisphere.

Video Spacer

“I was rooming with Henry Pyrgos, who was the 25th man,” he recalls.

“It was a brilliant experience, my first taste of being 24th man in an away game. Obviously it was a really disappointing result but a good experience to be in with the team, doing the warm-up, and seeing what it’s like on match-day in an international set-up.

“It wasn’t the result we were looking for. We had a hard look at it, reviewed it and realised we just didn’t play the way we wanted to play. We’re looking to put the wrongs right when we go down there now.

“Once the roof’s shut, it’s a pretty intimidating place to go. It’s a great stadium, the noise is unbelievable and the atmosphere is brilliant. It is places like that you want to go and play rugby. When we went to Thomond Park with Edinburgh it was brilliant – it’s a cauldron, a tough place to go, but that’s where you want to go and challenge yourself as a team.

“At the Principality, you try to talk to people in the warm-up and you can’t really hear them. It’s a brilliant atmosphere, they always get a great crowd in there and the noise is always right at the top.”

Kinghorn is right, Scotland have demons to banish and a dragon to slay this weekend, but he has his own challenges to confront. The November period is his best opportunity to further outline his international credentials.

Unseating a fit Hogg will be a mountainous undertaking. A slot on the wing looks a more likely long-term option. Townsend has a bucketful of excellent back-three competitors but if Kinghorn’s rise continues at this rate, he will be extremely hard to leave

You may also like: Owen Farrell will struggle with new tackle laws

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 40 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Former All Blacks coach offers progress report on Joseph Manu's preseason Former All Blacks coach confident in Joseph Manu's progress
Search