Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scotland's best chance at slaying the Pool B giants

(Photos by Levan Verdzeuli and David Rogers/Getty Images)

Scotland’s will go as underdogs into their Rugby World Cup opener with the defending champions but they have enough in their game to trouble the Springboks.

ADVERTISEMENT

To get the win will require something special but they have the man to do it, Finn Russell, who will need to produce a game similar to the third British & Irish Lions Test.

Scotland can win if they take the Springboks strengths away and play low phase, quick width rugby fuelled by the right kicking strategy.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The key is to avoid long phase counts with the ball where they will be jammed by the defensive line and eventually forced into the Boks’ back row, but also keep the ball in-play for as long as possible.

The attrition game that Ireland will attempt will not work for Scotland.

If Malcolm Marx is starting with the likes of Duane Vermuelen and Siya Kolisi, these poachers will eat Scotland alive. They can’t play a collision game and get turned continually late or midway through the phase counts.

Scotland will need to kick a hell of a lot, but keep the ball in-play, avoiding touch finders coming out of their own half.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is something that Russell does frequently anyway, using his long kicking game to kick deep down the middle to find grass while Ali Price and Ben White need to find contestables with the box kick.

During the Lions series the Springboks could not handle aerial contests with Duhan van der Merwe on the left hand flank. South Africa’s backfield caught zero balls when going up against the towering ex-pat.

Each of those spills offered the Lions the chance to regather possession and strike against the retreating defensive line or drill another kick deep for territory.

Scotland need to exit with a contestable kick each time, preferably from the left side with Van der Merwe leading the kick chase to get up in the air.

ADVERTISEMENT

Head-to-Head

Last 4 Meetings

Wins
4
Draws
0
Wins
0
Average Points scored
27
13
First try wins
100%
Home team wins
25%

This is South Africa’s biggest weakness and it must be targetted.

Willemse can have poor nights under the high ball and Le Roux’s height disadvantage is ripe for mismatches. Bomb the living daylights out of the Boks’ backfield.

When the Boks get the dropsies the heads drop and they lose their intensity, plus the best opportunities to strike come from these errors.

Then there is the short kicking game, needed to disarm the defensive line, which is perfect for Russell’s skillset, the No 10 with all the bag of tricks.

The dinks, the chips, the grubbers must be used inside South Africa’s half. The opportunities will come after the regather, and that is when Scotland must hit width immediately and find the strike weapons like Van der Merwe.

Russell must kick so much that he will be in the running for the golden boot award.

At Mt Smart during the Rugby Championship, Shannon Frizell’s barnstorming try came on the phases after a Beauden Barrett chip kick in-behind that was regathered by Richie Mo’unga.

The 10 metre gain from the chip kick left the Springboks defensive line in retreat mode, with zero line speed and disconnection all over the place.

Will Jordan spotted two tired props from way across the field, tracking from his right wing all the way to the other side to hit a ball off Aaron Smith to pierce this gap.

The Sione Tuipulotu-Huw Jones combination is key with the No 12 also possessing a short attacking kicking game required to get in behind the Springboks line. Jones is a good line runner who is perfect for the chase.

With kick options off 9, 10 and 12, they need to use them before the phase count gets high and find the space in behind.

When Scotland get the chance to launch from set-piece lineouts in decent field position, they must keep play inside either of the 15 metres tramlines.

Do not crash into the midfield and try and run forward pods around the corner.

The only plays that attack the middle of the field from lineouts should be first phase kicks in behind to turn the Springboks around straight away.

There are only two options on first phase with the ball-in-hand: attack the lineout seam inside the 10 channel or attack wide outside the 13 channel with a backs’ strike.

For attacking the seam there are two throws, a deliberate overthrow or a throw at the front at two. South Africa will give the front for free. Take it, maul, peel, and attack the seam.

South Africa will try and drive you over the sideline if you maul at the front of the lineout. This is desired as it will open up the highway up the seam and put a number of their forwards on the ground.

The peel must be ready and able to detach fast to prevent being bundled into touch. Detach and draw into contact the tail defender, often the Springbok hooker, Marx or Mbonambi, sometimes Mostert, who defends there.

If this defender is drawn, the seam will be wide open. Scotland must send their power runners like Duhan van der Merwe into that channel at Mannie Libbok’s inside shoulder.

After that there will be a wide open side on that second phase, it must be backs ball with Russell injecting to use the front foot ball with a quick recycle.

Strike plays utilising Russell’s long passing game or cross-field kicks that can hit the width are required.

Hit the seam then go straight to the edge all day long. Quick, short, sharp possessions.

Inside South Africa’s 22 consider being tackled into touch frequently. Of all the non-scoring negative outcomes, this is tactically one of the best.

A turnover penalty gives South Africa a free piggyback out of that zone with possession. Being held up loses up to 50 metres of territory from the goal line restart.

Being tackled out into touch within 15 metres of the try line will force the Springboks into a two-phase exit kick and hand Scotland another launch.

Rinse repeat the same formula until you score out wide or keep getting tackled into touch. Van der Merwe can win 5-10 metres through post-contact every time before going into touch. When he gets within scoring distance, he can have a crack.

To win Scotland need to achieve these things:

1) minimise the Springboks breakdown threats (low phase counts, low amount of middle third rucks)
2) minimise the opposition scrum count
3) Create frequent aerial battles and kick coverage situations to defend
4) Attack wide frequently and early

This kind of plan isn’t foolproof as every high ball contest or loose bouncing ball could end up in South Africa’s favour, but what it does do is increase the chance of a Scotland win. And that’s all you can ask for.

Getting dragged into a set-piece battle or a collision battle will fail. With a 6-2 or 7-1 split, all of South Africa’s power is all up front.

Scotland need a game plan that basically takes the socket out of the wall and turns that power off.

And they have Finn Russell, the perfect player to orchestrate that.

They need to go over them, then around them, and avoid everything else in between.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

31 Comments
S
Shaylen 441 days ago

Ben I disagree. The way to beat the Boks is with possession rugby and launch phase after phase and wear that defence down. keep the ball for multiple phases until the defence breaks. The contestable kicking strategy and attacking with width is an interesting one. I will say the Boks have been beaten there in the past but I feel you need to blend it with possession. The Bok team that lost to NZ earlier this year was completely underdone. This Bok team will be ready for the plan you described. Scotland havent trained a possession game the last 4 years so that they can now go and change that at this stage. They need to play like they did against France a few weeks back and then I reckon they have a shot

R
Riekert 441 days ago

Ben and then you woke up from this horrible nightmare, Scotland must first get the ball before they can even think of what to do with it, and when they get it they have two or three Boks on top of them, as good as Russel is and he is very good it is not easy playing behind a pack of forwards going back words.

R
Richard 442 days ago

Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the face-Mike Tyson.

J
Johan 442 days ago

This is a good analysis. Sometimes Ben struggles to hide his disdain, but this is not it. If Saffas puke on everything he writes, you/we are as painfully subjective as we accuse him of being...

d
dave 443 days ago

Go Ben. That's some detailed thinking there. Scotland looked good against France and have a very smart coach in Gregor. I think SA would win this match 8 times out of 10. Here's hoping this is one of the 2.

C
Chris 443 days ago

This is exactly what the B & I lions tried and we all know how that worked out. Scotland simply do not have the forwards to play the kick and hope game. The kick in behind didn’t work for the All Blacks at twickenham, so there’s a very small chance of it being successful if at all.

A
Ace 443 days ago

"they have the man to do it, Finn Russell, who will need to produce a game similar to the third British & Irish Lions Test."

Which they lost.

Ben Smith talks a very good fight.

B
Bob Marler 443 days ago

Good luck Scotland.

W
Warren 443 days ago

It’s an interesting article. Lots of merit in what Bin Smut has written here. We all know that teams often play as well as their opposition allow them to. Finn is a magic player and conjure something special. So can Manie… Duhan is a powerful runner, but Moodie is a brilliant defender and a magic attacker. It all promises to be a fascinating game. To everyone giving Bin Smut grief. Just ignore him…

J
Jonathan 443 days ago

The only issue is that you are giving the ball to DW/Kolbe with those kicks. They are brilliant on attack, only a matter of time before they break the line.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search