Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Scotland's game has definitely evolved': Ben Youngs identifies key men in Scotland's transformation

By PA
Scotland have to be known as a side that can win the odd big game (Pic /PA Images)

Ben Youngs credits Scotland’s new generation of game-breakers led by Finn Russell and Stuart Hogg for their increased emphasis on attacking rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

England head to Edinburgh on Saturday in possession of a poor record from the last four Calcutta Cup clashes having lost twice and drawn once – a remarkable 38-38 stalemate at Twickenham in 2019.

Youngs was present for three of those afternoons and made his debut at Murrayfield a decade ago with his 11 Tests against England’s oldest rivals the highest number played by anyone in Eddie Jones’ squad.

Video Spacer

RugbyPass Offload | Episode 18

Video Spacer

RugbyPass Offload | Episode 18

He has seen first hand Scotland’s transformation into a more dangerous side orchestrated by fly-half Russell and full-back Hogg, while also noting the influence of Hamish Watson in the back row.

“Scotland’s game has definitely evolved, without doubt. Finn has had a big say in that with the way he approaches the game,” Youngs said.

“I’d say he’s a very similar style to (England fly-half) Marcus Smith in terms of that ability to make big plays, to roll the dice and have the tools in the armoury to actually pull them off.

“It’s fascinating really and he’s had an instrumental role. And of course Stuart Hogg, who has had a great career and will continue to have a great career. Him at full-back is a constant threat.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With that they’ve got a pack that will give them plenty of ball. Hamish Watson, what he does around the breakdown and all that.

“They play a fast game, move the ball a lot more. They have game-breakers and potentially those guys have had a huge say in where they are now.”

Youngs is in the rare position of having never lost at Murrayfield but there were some close shaves along the way, according to the Leicester scrum-half who is set to become England’s most capped player during this Six Nations.

“Every game I’ve ever played up there there’s never been too much between the teams,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We had an incident, I can’t remember what year it was now, it feels like forever ago, but someone’s hand went underneath my tummy and I grounded the ball right at the end of the game. We escaped that day!

“There was Storm Ciara in 2020. The one on the wing was where I made my debut in 2010. It was a 15-15 draw. A Calcutta Cup classic that one!

“When you go to Murrayfield it adds to the challenge but it’s the challenge that you want. We’re certainly excited by it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 1 hour ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

I understand that there are choices to be made in professional sports and choices have consequences, but it does seem strange that a professional athlete who plies their trade in order to make a living cannot represent their country at test level. All talk of loyalty and so on is an outdated argument, we live in a global economy. It makes the armchair critic feel nice and so on, chatting smack about loyalty to a jersey and so on, but to think that someone like Mounga is not loyal to NZ just bc he is taking a paycheck - which as a professional athlete he is entitled to do - is a quite silly. No one is calling PSDT or Handre Pollard disloyal to SA bc they are taking a better paycheck somewhere else. No one accuses Cheslin Kolbe of being disloyal to the Green and Gold just because he missed out on years of eligibility by playing in France. Since Rassie opened the selection policy, the overseas players have more than proved their worth. Anyone who says otherwise is deluded and is living in an outdated version of reality. South Africans understand that the ZAR is worth very little and so no one in the country criticises a South African for leaving to find better economic opportunities elsewhere.


This is the same for anyone, anywhere. If there is an economic opportunity for someone to take, should they lose national privilege because they are looking for a better paycheck somewhere else? What a silly idea. The government doesn't refuse your passport because you work in another country, why should you lose your national jersey for this? If a player leaves to a so-called lesser league and their ability to represent their national jersey at a high level diminishes bc of it, then that should say it all. If Mounga were to return to the ABs and his playmaking is better than D-Mac and BB, then he is the better player for the position. If BB and D-Mac eclipse him, then they are the better players and should get the nod. Why is this so difficult to understand? Surely you want the best players to play in the national team, regardless of who pays their monthly salary? Closing borders is historically a silly economic idea, why should it be any different in national level sports?


The old boys tradition in rugby has created a culture of wonderful sportsmanship, it is why we all (presumably) prefer the game to football. But when tradition gets in the way of common sense and sporting success, perhaps traditions should change. Players have the right to earn money, there is no need to punish them for it. Rugby needs to think globally if it wants to survive.

36 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Scotland are in a good place, but can they become ruthless Six Nations contenders?' 'Scotland are in a good place, but can they become ruthless Six Nations contenders?'
Search