Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scott Barrett reveals how Ellis Park’s altitude challenged All Blacks

By Finn Morton
Scott Barrett of New Zealand in action during the Castle Lager Rugby Championship match between South Africa and New Zealand at Emirates Airline Park on August 31, 2024 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Dirk Kotze/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

If you’re ever fortunate enough to walk down the famed tunnel at Johannesburg’s Ellis Park, you’ll see an unmissable black sign that’s dominated by capital letters. ‘1,753m ABOVE SEA LEVEL,’ the sign reads, which adds to the theatre of rugby war out on the field itself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whenever there’s an international rugby match at the now-called Emirates Airline Park, discussions about the altitude factor seem to be discussed in the media on a daily basis. That was no different this week, with journalists speaking about it regularly before Saturday’s Test.

All Blacks lock Sam Darry had suffered a nosebleed after standing up on the plane after landing in Johannesburg for the first time. Whether or not that’s down to the altitude factor can’t be said with complete certainty but Darry himself seemed to believe that was the reason.

Ellis Park is one of the most intimidating venues to play at for an opposing team and some of that comes down to the difficulty of it being ‘1,753m above sea level’. It makes it harder to breathe – by all accounts, it’s tough on the lungs when the going gets tough.

On Saturday evening, the All Blacks squandered a 10-point lead with 12 minutes to play against the Springboks. Captain Scott Barrett wouldn’t quite admit that the altitude was the decisive reason for defeat, but he did explain how it’s a challenge to play at Ellis Park.

“I guess it’s the same for both teams. It certainly challenges your decision making,” Barrett told reporters. “It’s a hell of an arena but I think that’s where we thrive, we love that, those moments and we’ll be better for that experience.

“It’s amazing,” he added when asked about the crowd. “There were a few quiet patches within that game which I guess was pleasing but I guess they had the last roar in the last 10 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That hurts a wee bit.”

The All Blacks appeared to be on their way to a historic win with Jordie Barrett and Caleb Clarke both crossing for tries inside the opening 12 minutes of the second term. Ellis Park was deafeningly loud except for the times when the visitors scored tries.

Related

It was a bit of a tussle from there as the match swung in South Africa’s favour, but a definitive turning point was a yellow card to Ofa Tu’ungafasi. New Zealand went down to 14 men and they struggled to match the might of the Boks.

With the Boks storming for the win, they’re now one more victory away from claiming the Freedom Cup. It’s all to play for next Saturday when the two great rivals meet again down south in Cape Town.

“The great week down in Cape Town, we’re looking forward to it. There’s always plenty of support down there,” Barrett said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I guess we’ll relish the occasion and hopefully put a performance in that’s a little bit better than tonight.”

The Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup is in full swing - catch every match live on RugbyPass TV or via your local broadcaster! Watch here

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
J
JK 13 days ago

ABs have a good record at Ellis Park recently so there's that

D
DS 13 days ago

People have forgotten how altitude was such a major factor in these matches. The last 20 minutes with the bench looked like the old problem emerged.

M
MattJH 14 days ago

Gotta close those ones out, lads. Time to Wallace it up.

A
AH 13 days ago

The dude who gave away 3 penalties in the last 10 minutes against Argentina? Maybe you mean sotutu

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 10 minutes ago
Any Prem-URC merger should be rejected out of hand

CVC Capital Partners paid UK£120 million (US$169 million) for a 28 per cent stake in the URC in May 2020, one of a series of deals agreed by the private equity firm in its bid to reshape rugby union.

The TV deals are small in Europe (well Britain I should say, and in re to rugby). That 55m is just a total somone came up with, it's not the "deal" like say the number TNT/BT are paying for the Premiership. It's also got to be spread between more teams.


URC deal more than doubled when SA joined, so you have to think at least 25mil of that number is from SuperSport and only for the SA teams. It will also be fake, just a inflation number that is converted to mean 25mil worth inside South Africa, but if that money went outside, wouldn't total 10mil in real money.


Revenue also trumps everything in business. Most big new ventures run at a loss, heavily investing their revenue to balance the sheets better. As CVC owns some of both competitions I don't think you are going to see their relative year on year revenue growth. But we do get information on the clubs themselves, and the prem heavily outweigh the traditional URC teams (no idea how teams like the Sharks will be doing, although not relevant here anyway).


It's nothing against SA, when someone says theres more money in England, it a saying that usually means 'a bigger pot' to get potential revenue from. It's simple economics when it comes down to it a lot of the time is the suggestion, which of course, is perfectly if you don't believe (because theres always more too it), but sprouting silly stuff in return just makes you a laughing stock.

34 Go to comments
A
Anendra Singh 38 minutes ago
Scott Robertson has mounting problems to fix for misfiring All Blacks

I've always had a non-emotional approach to analysing sports. In fact, I must be deficient in patriotic genes. I find my perch on the mound of realism, not positivity. If it was simply a case of hopping into the positive wagon, we would never have any dilemmas. Human values play a pivotal role, too. In that vein, it was obvious to me and some that Scott Robertson wasn't going to cut it as captaincy material. Mind you, Richie McCaw had started in that mould but he was still cutting his teeth. However, I agree that one did need to turf his playmaker book in several respects. The fundamental question for me is if Razor has appointed an attacking coach, why then not listen to him when push comes to shove? It's a formula for destruction. That has come to pass with Jordan's shortcomings, never mind the others who have been shuffled out of position. I think it's a little myopic to adhere steadfastly to the if you leave the country you're not in the ABs' equation. It had worked in the yesteryear but it's the 21st century now and professionalism dictates the tempo. Players rightly see the game as a job within a narrow window. They should be given the option to ply their trade abroad to make money. Unfortunately, the ABs have treated some players shabbily. The bromance with the black jersey is a myth nowadays. It's just a means to a lucrative payday as a bullet point on one's CV. Who can blame them? Besides, the "tiny nation" concept is relative to when rugby union was an even smaller fish pond. Factor in Sth Africa in the exile for obvious reasons and it puts that in perspective. A smaller NZ also means more resources per player from grassroots level to bigger countries as opposed to island nations. It's all relative.

75 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Any Prem-URC merger should be rejected out of hand

If you ran a new but thriving business, one that attracted customers from all over the world, that produced a range of high quality products and was projected to continue to grow for at least the foreseeable future, would you hitch your wagon to a business that has been forced to shrink while so many of its most talented employees have left? No, you’d be mad to do anything of the sort. So why is this story of a possible merger between the United Rugby Championship and the Premiership being taken seriously?

This wouldn't be anything to do with the URC would it, as that is an independent body? This is about what each national body wants, which as you should know from SANZAR days is not what is best for the competitions. Now SR has an independent board as well, I'm not sure if URCs is more powerful than SR's though?


Theres no denying that the introduction of the overpowered South African teams is going to hurt the Celtic teams that can't keep up with the big boys. We, as fans, just want the best outcome for the game though, which certainly isn't going to be SA returning to SR. WR wil need to do something bigger but I think there is potential in Africa and Europe for SA to lead that?


While I agree with a lot of key points made here I think the author is hiding the most obvious one. South Africa will dominate the URC for the rest of it's existence if the current model remains. Another point that might outweigh all in this article is, "where is the development?". What is a URC with more SA'n teams and more Irish team's going to look like?

started bullying English, French and New Zealand packs.

Haha a noticeable omission here?


Look, isn't European Cup already dead with African sides in it? It's just deciding who the best is out of a buch of different leagues (that physically viable in RE to SA, as its only viable around 1 ever 4 years for the new world club comp). This is hardly for Wales, or perhaps it is? The Welsh teams are not going to go into the Premiership. But, they would perform a strong basis for the second division. That is this ideas real strength, promotion relegation between relevant teams. You'd think 14 team divisions would be perfect, and I'd suggest would be great for the game in the area. Yes, even better for the Celtic nations that what having SA has been.

34 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'With near-religious conviction, how good does it feel to be a Bok fan?' 'With near-religious conviction, how good does it feel to be a Bok fan?'
Search