Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scott Cummings banned following his red-carded Franco Mostert clash

The big screen at Murrayfield after Scotland's Scott Cummings was red carded by Christophe Ridley (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Scott Cummings has learned his fate after he was cited for the red card brandished to him during Scotland’s 15-32 Autumn Nations Series defeat at home to South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 27-year-old second row was originally yellow carded by referee Christophe Ridley for his early first-half clear-out on Franco Mostert, the Springboks forward, and this decision was soon upgraded to a red card offence on review by the TMO bunker.

After Cummings was summoned to appear at a disciplinary hearing on Tuesday, he learned that he must now serve a one-game ban and will miss this Saturday’s game in Edinburgh versus Portugal. However, he will be available for selection in the series-ending game against Australia.

Video Spacer

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend on that red card and other missed opportunities

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend believes his team had some “bad luck” in their 15-32 defeat to the Springboks at Murrayfield on Sunday.

Video Spacer

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend on that red card and other missed opportunities

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend believes his team had some “bad luck” in their 15-32 defeat to the Springboks at Murrayfield on Sunday.

A statement read: “Scotland number five Scott Cummings appeared before an independent disciplinary committee via video link having received a 20-minute red card for an act of foul play contrary to law 9.20 (e) in the match between Scotland and South Africa on Sunday 10.

“The independent disciplinary committee was chaired by Rhian Williams (Wales), joined by former international referee Donal Courtney (Ireland) and former international player Olly Kohn (Wales).

Team Form

Last 5 Games

4
Wins
1
2
Streak
3
26
Tries Scored
13
87
Points Difference
-96
4/5
First Try
2/5
3/5
First Points
2/5
4/5
Race To 10 Points
1/5

“Having accepted that the act of foul play justified the red card and by applying World Rugby’s sanctioning provisions, the disciplinary committee determined that whilst reckless, the low-range entry point of two weeks was appropriate.

“With the full 50 per cent mitigation applied, based on an exemplary disciplinary record, good conduct and having shown remorse, the sanction was reduced to one week. The suspension will cover the following match: November 16 – Scotland versus Portugal.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

26 Comments
B
Bull Shark 38 days ago

Guys guys. Next year they’re going to introduce a new law. Like you can’t tickle a prop in a scrum or some sh-t and then some players are going to get banned for weeks and other are going to get slaps on the wrist.


It’s the same thing every year.


Let’s just agree that croc rolls are bad and Cummings was unlucky - but f-ck him anyway. He’s Scottish. Who cares. They always get a raw deal.

S
SteveD 38 days ago

I really cannot believe the comments below, and many many others, that this was a legal tackle, 'croc roll' or whatever the **** you want to call it. The only thing I would say is that the other oke should also have been sent off! Like the idiots trying to downplay head high tackles by Cane in the RWC final, and Esterhuizen in Portugal game, have another freaking look at the videos and tell me they weren't red cards finish and klaar. (Oh and if I see another complaint that 'Kolisi's tackle in the RWC should have been a red' I'll tell the whingers to go and revisit those videos too. It was never close!) Maybe remember that World Rugby, for all their faults, are trying to spread the game, and bulldust like the players' actions, and your stupid reactions, aren't going to convince parents to let their kids play a game that might result in them getting MND or broken backs. Think a bit more before sounding off with your weak excuses?

E
Ed the Duck 38 days ago

Any comment on Kriel head contact from upright tackle on Huw Jones in Marseilles…?

S
SL 39 days ago

I can guarantee that there is no way on Gods green Earth that Scott Cummings accepts that a red card was justified. It wasn't! The worst kind of Groupthink Bullshit from the officiating team. If he were a Kiwi, Irish, English or SA player it would have been rescinded in short order. I have just cancelled my TNTsport subscription and will no longer be following the Autumn nations series in protest at the ongoing disaster which is the Bunker review system.

B
Bull Shark 38 days ago

If he were a Kiwi, Irish, English or SA player it would have been rescinded in short order.

If that should come to pass, then we can collectively lose our minds at the injustice.


But until that happens - let’s see this as a positive in eliminating a dangerous practice the game doesn’t need.

E
Ed the Duck 39 days ago

Just a bizarre set of outcomes, it is clear from the replays that the Bok 9 attempted to stand and impacted Cummings trajectory as he was already committed to the clear out. As you say, this is groupthink bullshit…

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search