Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scott Lawrence: 'I think the forward pass for the Fiji try was a pivotal moment in the game'

Scott Lawrence

USA head coach Scott Lawrence is never one to mince his words when breaking down his team’s performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking today ahead of his team’s final Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup clash with Samoa in the third-place play-off match, Lawrence reflected on his team’s performance against Fiji.

Match Summary

1
Penalty Goals
1
3
Tries
0
2
Conversions
0
0
Drop Goals
0
129
Carries
80
5
Line Breaks
3
21
Turnovers Lost
19
6
Turnovers Won
8

“I think it was a pretty solid performance from our men,” Lawrence summarised before delving into the details, “We were able to execute the game plan that we wanted to, and we had a couple of opportunities to score in the game.”

Highlighting where he felt the match got away from his team, Lawrence did not mince his words when referencing Fiji’s second try scored by backrow Elia Canakaivata. This score took Fiji two converted tries clear at 17 – 3, bringing the Eagles’ momentum to a shuddering halt.

“I think the forward pass for the Fiji try was a pivotal moment in the game, and I think, nonetheless, we should have taken advantage of our opportunities there. So we’ll look to just be better inside the twenty-two this week in terms of converting.”

Struggling mightily at scrum time during the opening thirty-five minutes, Lawrence discussed the issue and spoke about his thought process for naming a new front row.

“I think once we were able to reset and get our scrum height right, we would be solid in the game against Fiji.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It wasn’t as much down to personnel as it was around our own process, which I think we were able to fix at halftime. This week, Jack Escarro is out with an injury, so we’ll change that with Jake Turnbull coming in.

“Peyton (Telea) is another of the younger players we invited to see what we were working with and to start his journey to becoming a future Eagle.

“He’s come along really well; he’s done a lot of work with the team. He’s four weeks more conditioned than he was when he came in, and that’s a huge part of it.

“He’s hung right in there at set piece, so I think when you look at Peyton, I get excited by the potential of what he can offer. You have a ball-carrying ball-playing front row, and when you can add that into the mix next to a hooker, it opens up your attack and gives you options to do more things.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So that part about Peyton is exciting, and I think he’ll go well tomorrow, and we’ll be able to use that in the future.”

Despite having 70% of their possession inside the Fijian half, the Eagles could not find a way through the relentless Fijian defence. Referencing the need to remain patient when presented with opportunities, Lawrence was frank in his assessment of his team attack.

Attack

176
Passes
104
129
Ball Carries
80
374m
Post Contact Metres
199m
5
Line Breaks
3

“It probably just comes down to decision-making at times.

“Sometimes we probably get stuck thinking about it too much, and then overthinking stops us from just playing naturally and playing the way we want to play.

“Then other times it’s just down to execution; at this test level, it comes down to the one, two percenters. If one person happens to miss their clean, then they’re over the ball just like that.

“It just probably comes down to those two points, and we worked really hard this week on those points specifically, and I think we’ll make some big shifts this weekend around it.”

On the flip side of proceedings, Lawrence’s side ended their clash with Fiji sitting on an 80% tackle success rate as they, at times, struggled to contain the explosive Fijian attack. Probing this point, Lawrence was asked if the defensive issues were down to the system or simply lapses in concentration.

Defence

91
Tackles Made
146
19
Tackles Missed
36
83%
Tackle Completion %
80%

“If you look at the source of the three tries, one of them was a defensive try from Fiji where they turned us over on the try line, so we kind of look at that and go that’s down to us just being more clinical in how we exited.

“Again, the second one was a very good defensive play; it was a forward pass. So I wiped that one off the board, to be honest.

“I think the defence did their job, and then Fiji will always find one-on-ones.

“Most test teams have one or two explosive plays where they’ll have a special play they may even score off of when they get it right.

“We thought they would always have the opportunity. But if you look back at the games Fiji played before, they had six to seven explosive plays with tries in their previous games. So I was happy with our consistency in defence last week.”

Delving into his team’s approach to the contest, the coach was asked if his team had discussed a more pragmatic approach to keeping the scoreboard ticking over. Asserting that his team took the points when they were available, Lawrence stressed that his team does not dwell on missed opportunities but instead focuses on how to better capitalise on them going forward.

“When you look at where the penalties occurred, there were two within kick distance. In our opinion, we took both of those opportunities to kick for points.

“The ones that were not, we went for the corner where it wasn’t within our range. So I think  just for us, in terms of the opportunities, one was just a lost ball in the lights at the line-out, and that happens; it’s part of the game.

“Another opportunity was when we had someone right in front of the ruck we could have run at, and they saw something else. So we don’t dwell on it too much, we just kind of look at it and say we’ll keep the ball next time and work our way in.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
F
FF 92 days ago

🥱 if it was a forward try then they would have checked it with tv match official. It's ok, you guys lost.

J
Jonathan Foster 92 days ago

In this match, Fiji’s performance was exceptional, and the statistics reflect that they were the superior team on the day.


For instance:


Possession: Fiji controlled 59% of the possession during the match, while the USA only had 41% (RugbyPass, 2024). This allowed Fiji to apply constant pressure on USA’s defense and create more opportunities for scoring.


Territory: Fiji spent 64% of the match in USA’s half, keeping the Americans under sustained pressure (World Rugby, 2024).


Offensive Play: Fiji made 7 line breaks, compared to USA’s 3. In addition, Fiji completed 12 offloads while USA only managed 5, highlighting Fiji's superior attacking ability and ball handling (World Rugby, 2024).


Scrums and Rucks: Fiji was dominant in the scrums, winning 100% of their own scrums (8 out of 8), whereas USA only won 71% of theirs (5 out of 7).


Additionally, Fiji won 6 turnovers compared to USA’s 2 (ESPN, 2024). This scrummaging and breakdown superiority was a critical factor in controlling the game.


Additionally, while forward passes can be contentious, it’s important to note that USA was also guilty of making 3 forward passes during the match, which resulted in lost opportunities and turnovers (RugbyPass, 2024).


These key errors disrupted momentum and contributed to their inability to maintain a sustained attack.


References

ESPN. (2024). Fiji vs USA match report. Retrieved from https://www.espn.com/rugby/match


RugbyPass. (2024). Scott Lawrence on the Fiji match and forward pass controversy. Retrieved from https://www.rugbypass.com/news


World Rugby. (2024). Fiji triumphs over USA in a thrilling encounter. Retrieved from https://www.world.rugby.com

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search