Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Picked on weaker players': USA Eagles' successful game plan for Canada

(Source/World Rugby)

The USA Eagles got off to the perfect start in their Asahi Super Dry Pacific Nations Cup campaign with a 28-15 victory over Canada in Los Angeles.

ADVERTISEMENT

And while the second half relied on dogged defence and determination to withstand Canada’s push to bring the game alive again by getting within one score, it was a comfortable win in the end.

“Test wins are rare, and test matches in general, rare for us. So we’ll take we’ll take that,” head coach Scott Lawrence told RugbyPass.

“We made some progress on the things we worked on coming into the game, around just our ball retention and our discipline, and we’ll continue to build on those things.”

A first-half clinic by flyhalf Luke Carty got the Eagles off to a fast start, while Canada’s set-piece issues plagued them and allowed the United States to dictate terms.

On attacking Canada wide early, Lawrence praised his side for identifying the space and going after it.

“I think they just recognized the opportunity. We were going to play what they gave us tonight. And the boys recognized that and took advantage of it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Both sides are very familiar with each other with most of Canada’s players suiting up in the MLR alongside the majority of the US players.

That familiarity became an advantage for the US who knew what they needed to do to shut down Canada’s game.

Lock Greg Peterson, a key leader and contributor on the night to the set-piece dominance, was happy with how his forward pack nullified Canada.

Once Canada’s maul was stopped dead in part due to the new laws, the US forced the visitors to play away from their traditional strength.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We knew that Canada was going to have a very strong line out a couple good, very good operators with a very, like, very strong, very good maul,” he said.

“So we knew we wanted to play around them in terms of not taking on where they were strong. So we picked on some of their weaker players.

“And then when it came to the maul time with that new law change, we knew we just had to stop it for a couple of seconds, wait for the ref to kind of give us that ‘use it’ call and then, you know, then they’d have to play it. So use the laws a bit to our advantage at times.”

After a disappointing July series which featured two defeats to Romania and Scotland, the United States forward pack wanted to respond the right way.

“We just had to front up, we’ve practiced that a lot because obviously our performances against Romania and Scotland went up to par for, you know, this the standard of pack we want to be,” Peterson said.

“We really stepped it up in terms of working on those aspects of the game and knowing that Canada were going to be strong in those areas. We knew we had to double down.”

Star midfielder Tomasso Boni was one of the United States’ best on-field against Canada, with powerful carries propelling their launch attacks over the gain line, class touches in attack and an impact on defence with multiple turnovers won.

The former Azzurri midfielder went as far as saying the intensity of the United States training camp was greater than the match, allowing the team to dominate.

“I think we, we really did well on more than having the ball and pulling the trigger,” Boni said.

“I believe that we train harder than the game and today was, was, was an evidence of the fact that we were more tired during our trainings than this game, so it means that it’s working.”

Flyhalf Luke Carty, named player of the match in the win, had the ball on a string in the match using all his skills in the toolbox to take apart Canada.

Whether by cross-field kicks, long cutout passes, chip kicks, end-over-end kicks, he had complete control over the game.

“I think he had good control. You know, we talked about him commanding the game in between the 22s, and I think he did a good job of that tonight. His kicking game was it was fairly accurate and on a really, kind of a strange ball had a weird flight to it tonight, for both teams. So yeah, I was really pleased with Luke tonight,” Lawerence said of his No.10.

He was credited for two try assists, the second an absolute “worldie” with a chip chase regather and inside pass to his fullback to draw the last man.

His outside midfielder Boni said it was “his day” and was really pleased with how their combination worked.

“I think Carty had a great, great game, obviously, and when he had a plan that has so much confidence and shout all the time everything, it’s kind of easier, and we all try to help him,” he said.

“But today, it was his day, right? So I think, I think we found a really good balance.”

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
CT 109 days ago

This is more appropriate for you Benni

R
Reader76 109 days ago

Relegated to commenting on North American rugby.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search