Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Scott Robertson razor focussed on Crusaders amidst England speculation

(Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Crusaders CEO Colin Mansbridge admits the team have had plans in place for life after Scott Robertson for some time now, but until that day comes, Razor remains entirely dedicated to his Super Rugby club.

ADVERTISEMENT

With the recent sackings of Wayne Pivac and Eddie Jones, rumours again started swirling that Scott “Razor” Robertson could be appointed head coach of a tier-one national side. One of those doors was shut with relative haste while the other is creaking its way to a close with Robertson again on the outside looking in.

International rugby’s (potential) loss is undoubtedly Canterbury’s gain and as Mansbridge told Martin Devlin on The Platform, Robertson’s focus has never waned too far from his Crusaders family.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“The guy, Razor, he’s got this razor-like focus on the program at the moment,” Mansbridge said. “The preseason, he’s fully immersed, he’s talking lovingly about the coaches and the players and you wouldn’t think there’s anything else on his mind other than Crusaders 2023.

“Now, obviously, outside of the environment it doesn’t look and feel quite like that but I can assure you, inside the place, he’s just absolutely focussed on 2023. We’ve been through a couple of changes before obviously, Jason (Ryan), and Andrew Goodman went to Leinster so we’re reasonably well-practised at dealing with these things.

“We’ve been through how do we deal with these things before, because we did it obviously last year, it’s pretty public knowledge that we had to deal with those things as did other Super clubs so we’ve been through the process before, we’ve thought about it.

“But, now… those plans sit in the bottom draw and we just dust them off if something happens. In the meantime, we just assume 2023 is all-go.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Mansbridge admitted he has tried to convince not just Robertson but also Razor’s wife to stick with the club beyond his current contract.

The CEO also expressed acceptance, albeit reluctant about Razor’s inevitable departure.

“We’ve accepted it, but if nothing else happened, and he turned around and said “could I stay?” – and I’ve been talking to his wife Jane a few times trying to convince them for that to be the case – we would absolutely, you know, I’d try talk the guy into staying but I think the reality is, his contract expires the end of ’24 and he can leave after the World Cup in ’23.

“The nature of Super Rugby is, it’s actually a development competition in some respects – it’s more than that, it’s a great competition in its own right but out of that competition, players get selected for the All Blacks and coaches go on to bigger and better things so at your core you’ve got to believe that you’re a development organisation first. That’s how we feel about the players so whatever happens to him (Roberston) so if he wants to do it, he’d go with our blessing.”

Related

The Crusaders head into Super Rugby Pacific 2023 with a more future-focused sense of stability after the competition was extended to 2030.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mansbridge spoke on some of the rewards that the confirmed longevity of the competition provides for clubs.

“It makes a lot of difference. I think all the clubs have had really tough year in ’22, obviously with a slightly abridged competition and no crowds for a period, I think the other thing that’s happened is that the uncertainty actually made it difficult with some of our longer-term partners because they’re starting to think, they planned a lot longer than one year out so for us, the certainty of the competition and I think the commitment to make the thing work is probably more exciting.

“We’ve got Moana Pacifika in there, we’ve got Fijian Drua in there… now we’ve got a commitment on that format of competition for essentially a decade almost you can go ‘right, we can make this thing hum’ and that’s what I’m really excited about and I think actually sponsors and partners are telling us the same story so very stoked about that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search