Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Seismic world rankings change after whirlwind Rugby World Cup weekend

Anton Lienert-Brown, left, and Beauden Barrett of New Zealand after the 2023 Rugby World Cup quarter-final match between Ireland and New Zealand at the Stade de France in Paris, France. (Photo By Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

South Africa are back on top of the world ranking after a whirlwind Rugby World Cup quarter-final weekend which saw both Ireland and France dumped out of the tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ireland suffering a repeat of their RWC 2019 quarter-final loss to New Zealand means that South Africa will replace them at the summit of the World Rugby rankings following their victory over France. The Irish quarter-final curse struck again, with Andy Farrell’s men unable to claw back an early All Blacks lead.

Ireland lose the top spot for the first time in over 12 months, as their 17-game unbeaten streak was brought to a dramatic end by Ian Foster’s avenging All Blacks.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

England’s narrow win over the lower-ranked Fiji in Marseille sees them climb above Scotland into fifth.

The Flying Fijians remain in 10th despite their loss to Steve Borthwick’s men, who are the only unbeaten team left in the tournament.

The fact that Argentina beat Wales and reach a second semi-final in three Rugby World Cups means that Los Pumas are now the higher-ranked of the two sides.

Double ranking points at the World Cup mean those teams left in the tournament can gain significant ground of those who have already exited, that is if they are not already in front of them on the log.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

63 Comments
D
DCS125 426 days ago

But the tweetie, tweet, tweet, Irish 🇮🇪, who I have zero sympathy for. Gobby they are, deserved to be knocked out.

The French though, unlucky, like that French side a lot.

j
jeremy 431 days ago

Perhaps if you actually showed the rankings it would help

A
Antonio 431 days ago

Amazing tournament and some breathtaking moments in every game, the ¼finals were edge of the seat games slightly blemished by some dubious refereeing decisions.
I also notice that disrespect for the officials is creeping into the game more and more
Best of Luck to the last 4.

P
Peter 431 days ago

Well that was a waste of ink ,no mention of NZ or England on their standings

J
John 431 days ago

Ranking is just a ranking and has little bearing on who wins when teams are close, it fluctuates and is prone to mismatching due to all teams not playing each other, as in a tournament/competition. The RWC is every 4 years so it is rare, is a multi-tiered competition and is the big prize every rugby playing nation wants. Trophies are best. Paper competitions are just that.

T
Thomas 432 days ago

Rankings schmankings.
It’s all about the silverware. Anything else is fool’s gold.

s
strachan 432 days ago

Ratings means piss. Ask Ireland

T
ThorTheGiant 432 days ago

Some unbelievable rugby played over the weekend. Sad the Ireland got knocked out. It is what it is. Good luck to the last four

F
Fineyeken 432 days ago

It matters not one jot. Like football it will come down to TV audience figures and will be heavily biased in favour of a Murdoch subscriber base…..watch this space!

C
Chesterfield 432 days ago

The model has flaws in that the lack of yearly games against each opponent every year mean that end of year tours are ranked the same as Championship winning matches.
Only World Cup competition is rated double.
It has a bias towards a four yearly Knock Out comp which shouldn’t be weighted more highly than a round robin comp yearly.
Weighting the round robin comps against each other based upon previous World Cup positions would be more accurate.
https://www.world.rugby/tournaments/rankings/explanation.
You don’t bias the rating of the tennis #1 based on an Olympic Gold medal it’s based on yearly competition.
The lack of regular comps for tier two nations with promotion/relegation artificially bias’ the ranking system also.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 26 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search