Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Selection issues highlighted by players in review of Wallabies' 2023 fiasco

Wallabies head coach Eddie Jones poses with co-captains James Slipper and Michael Hooper during the Australian Wallabies Rugby Championship squad announcement at Sanctuary Cove on June 25, 2023 in Gold Coast, Australia. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

More transparency around player selections was one of 23 recommendations made to Rugby Australia following an external review into the Wallabies’ diabolical 2023 season under Eddie Jones.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA released the findings of the review on Thursday from a four-person panel comprising former internationals Andrew Slack and Justin Harrison, industry expert Darlene Harrison and Pasifika adviser Moana Leilua.

An overhaul of the high-performance unit – which has already been done with the appointments of Peter Horne as HP director, David Nucifora as an adviser and Joe Schmidt as Jones’s replacement as Wallabies head coach – was one of the key recommendations.

Video Spacer

Revealed – The decisive factor in the decision to name Siya Kolisi captain | RPTV

Former Stormers coach Robbie Fleck talks about the moment he realised Siya Kolisi should be Stormers captain. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Revealed – The decisive factor in the decision to name Siya Kolisi captain | RPTV

Former Stormers coach Robbie Fleck talks about the moment he realised Siya Kolisi should be Stormers captain. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

As was greater alignment between Australia’s five Super Rugby franchises for the greater good of the Wallabies.

Tellingly, establishing “more clearly defined roles and responsibilities for coaching staff” and refining “the team selection process to be more transparent for players” were also suggested.

The omission of long-time former captain Michael Hooper and fellow senior statesman Quade Cooper were the two biggest controversies arising from Jones’s naming of his greenhorn 33-man World Cup squad last year.

Yet Jones repeatedly refused to explain Cooper’s non-selection, which left Australia without an experienced playmaker during their doomed campaign in France, before finally revealing after the tournament he believed the Wallabies needed to move in another direction to progress.

ADVERTISEMENT

RA chief executive Phil Waugh said 94 participants from the Wallabies’ playing group, coaching staff and support group offered feedback for the review.

“What’s coming through from the players is you want real clarity as to how teams are being selected, who’s responsible for selection,” Waugh said.

“But also having real consistency of communication as to why a team is selected.

“And if you miss out, why did you miss out?”

Related

The Wallabies failed to progress out of the group stages of a World Cup for the first time in history after losing to Fiji also for the first time since 1954 and suffering their biggest ever defeat at the tournament, 40-6 against Wales.

Jones subsequently quit just 10 months into a five-year deal, prompting RA’s independent review.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Following the Rugby World Cup last year, we began to systematically apply structural and personnel changes to address a significant number of the improvement opportunities raised in the review,” RA chief executive Phil Waugh said on Thursday.

“Last season was a unique situation with a unique set of circumstances, and it was important for us to hold an external process to get a very detailed and honest evaluation from the stakeholders – especially the players.

“This will allow us to process the 2023 season and use it to build a stronger Wallabies program.

“We have been stressing the importance of an aligned and united rugby ecosystem across all levels, and it is essential that the Wallabies lead the way – the Wallabies are an important team to Australia, with a long and storied history.

“I am confident that this review will help draw a line in the sand as we strive to implement the processes and structures that will drive the Wallabies towards a successful future.”

Team Form

Last 5 Games

2
Wins
1
2
Streak
3
16
Tries Scored
13
0
Points Difference
-96
3/5
First Try
2/5
4/5
First Points
2/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
1/5

Horne said new coach Schmidt was across all the recommendations and was busily working behind the scenes in readiness for his first Test in charge, a shot at redemption against Wales in Sydney on July 6.

“He’s already making steps in terms of creating a culture, engaging with players,” Horne said.

“The Wallabies are under-performed and we’re looking to perform to the best of our ability.

“Joe talks about being competitive. He’s always very humble in that way.

“We will do our best to make sure that we’ve got this year the best team so that when we get into the British and Irish Lions next year, we’re actually able to compete significantly.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search