Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sharks player ratings vs Gloucester | EPCR Challenge Cup 2023/24

Hollywoodbet Sharks' Makazole Mapimpi scores a try in the second half during the EPCR Challenge Cup Final match between Gloucester Rugby and Hollywoodbets Sharks at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium on May 24, 2024 in London, England.(Photo by Rob Newell - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Sharks player ratings: The Hollywoodbet Sharks’ powerful forward pack laid the foundation for their convincing 36-22 win over Gloucester in the Challenge Cup Final at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, aided by a superb performance from their young standoff Siya Masuku.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how each player fared in the historic win, which saw the Sharks become the first South African side to win the a European competition.

1. Ox Nche – 8.5
A real presence in the scrums and relentless in the loose. His strength and technique gave the Sharks the upper hand up front, with Fraser Balmain struggling to deal with the Bok.

Video Spacer

Walk the Talk – Ardie Savea Trailer | RPTV

All Blacks ace Ardie Savea chatted to Jim Hamilton in Japan, reflecting on the RWC 2023 experience, life in Japan, playing for the All Blacks and what the future holds. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

WATCH NOW

Video Spacer

Walk the Talk – Ardie Savea Trailer | RPTV

All Blacks ace Ardie Savea chatted to Jim Hamilton in Japan, reflecting on the RWC 2023 experience, life in Japan, playing for the All Blacks and what the future holds. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

WATCH NOW

2. Bongi Mbonambi – 8.5
The experienced hooker was immense, leading from the front with aggressive carries and accurate lineout throwing. His leadership was crucial in the tight exchanges.

3. Vincent Koch – 8.5
Dominant in the scrums, Koch’s experience shone through. He provided a stable platform and was a force in the mauls and what about that 50:22 in the 32nd minute? Filth.

Set Plays

11
Scrums
4
45%
Scrum Win %
100%
16
Lineout
11
81%
Lineout Win %
82%
6
Restarts Received
10
100%
Restarts Received Win %
80%

4. Eben Etzebeth – 8
A colossus both literally and figuratively. Etzebeth’s physicality and presence were pivotal in the Sharks’ forward dominance. His sweeping to deny Chris Harris millimetres from the line was superb, even if Ugo Monye thinks it was illegal.

5. Gerbrandt Grobler – 7.5
Grobler complemented Etzebeth well in the lineouts and contributed with gritty work in the tight. Was man-handling Gloucester ballcarriers all night.

ADVERTISEMENT

6. James Venter – 8
A Josh-van-der-Flier-like tackling machine. Venter’s work rate was exceptional, making numerous dominant tackles and providing quick ball at the breakdown.

7. Vincent Tshituka – 7.5
A dynamic presence around the park, Tshituka was industrious in both attack and defence. His athleticism was on full display but it was a telling 39th-minute turnover on the deck that was maybe the highlight of his evening.

8. Phepsi Buthelezi – 8
Exploded into life on 26 minutes, breaking the Gloucester line before running it in from 40 metres out. One of the Sharks’ standout performers; Buthelezi’s energy, leadership and dynamic play were a big part of this Sharks’ win.

ADVERTISEMENT

9. Grant Williams – 8.5
Sharp and decisive, Williams controlled the tempo well and linked effectively with his forwards and backs. His box kicking was also first-class.

10. Siya Masuku – 8
An incredibly composed performance. Masuku managed the game efficiently and while not always spectacular, he ensured the Sharks played in the right areas of the field and crucially kept the scoreboard ticking over. So very nearly a perfect night from the kicking tee.

11. Makazole Mapimpi – 7.5
A couple of uncomfortable moments under the high ball. He didn’t threaten the Gloucester line much in the first-half, but was full of industry off the ball. Very nearly got over early in the second 40 following an electric break that led to Fassi’s crucial try. Collected a crossfield from Masuku that finished off Gloucester with 20 minutes to go on the clock.

12. Francois Venter – 7.5
Venter was part of a Sharks midfield that repeatedly won the battle of the gainline. His distribution was steady, if a little workmanlike.

13. Ethan Hooker – 7.5
Like Venter, Hooker was a roadblock in the midfield. His defensive performance disrupted Gloucester’s attacking flow, which never really got going. While he didn’t contribute all that much in attack, he and Venter were a formidable unit.

14. Werner Kok – 6
The Ulster-bound winger’s work rate and physicality were evident, even if opportunities to make an impact on the proceedings were few and far between.

Attack

123
Passes
102
92
Ball Carries
94
105m
Post Contact Metres
175m
3
Line Breaks
8

15. Aphelele Fassi – 7
Very lucky not to be carded for a clumsy challenge on Zach Mercer just two minutes into the game and sent off for 10 after a cumulative yellow for the South Africans. Got on the end of a 5-pointer on 55 minutes and was a menace whenever he got near  ball in the second half.

Replacements: 

16. Fez Mbatha – 6
Came on and maintained the set-piece solidity.

17. Ntuthuko Mchunu – 6
Brought fresh energy to the front row and kept up the pressure on Gloucester.

18. Hanru Jacobs – 5
Held his own after coming on with a few minutes to go.

19. Jeandre Labuschagne – NA
Despite the scoreline, Plumtree strangely didn’t see fit to use many of his bench (Labuschagne included) until the match was all but over.

20. Dylan Richardson – NA
As above.

21. Cameron Wright – NA
As above.

22. Curwin Bosch – NA
As above.

23. Eduan Keyter – NA
Unused.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search